Showing posts with label Ceres. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ceres. Show all posts

Sunday, 19 March 2023

Dwarf Planet 1 Ceres comes to opposition.

Dwarf Planet 1 Ceres will reach opposition (the point at which it is directly opposite the Sun when observed from the Earth) at 5.37 pm GMT on Tuesday 21 March 2023, when it will also be at the closest point on its orbit to the Earth, 1.60 AU (i.e. 1.6 times as far from the Earth as the Sun, or about 239 207 000 km), and be completely illuminated by the Sun. While it is not obvious to the naked eye observer, asteroids have phases just like those of the Moon; being further from the Sun than the Earth, 1 Ceres is 'full' when directly opposite the Sun. As 1 Ceres is only about 939.4 km in diameter, it will not be visible to the naked eye, but with a maximum Apparent Magnitude (luminosity) of 6.9 at opposition, it should be visible in the Constellation of Coma Berenices to viewers equipped with a good pair of binoculars or small telescope, with the best visibility being at about 1.20 am local time from anywhere on Earth.

The calculated orbit and position of 1 Ceres at 6.00 pm GMT on Tuesday 21 March 2023.  JPL Small Body Database

Because Ceres is further from the Sun than the Earth, its orbital period is much longer than ours, with the Dwarf Planet completing one obit every 1683 days (4.65 years), on an eccentric orbit tilted at 10.6° to the plane of the Solar System. The orbit of Ceres places it within the inner part of the Main Asteroid Belt, but due to its large size, with a diameter of 939.4 km, it is considered to be a Dwarf Planet rather than an asteroid.

High resolution image of Ceres made on 20 September 2020, by the Dawn Space ProbeWikimedia Commons/NASA/JPL/Caltech.

Ceres was discovered on 1 January 1801 by Giuseppe Piazzi, a Catholic priest at the Academy of Palermo, Sicily. It was the first body to be discovered in the Main Asteroid Belt, and at the time when it was discovered an international search was underway for a presumed 'missing planet' between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter (although Piazzi was studying stars when he first observed Ceres, and initially presumed he had found a new comet). Ceres was for a long time considered to be the largest asteroid in the Solar System, but in 2006 was re-classified as a Dwarf Planet, as part of a revision of the classification of Solar System bodies driven by the discovery of a growing number of bodies in the Outer Solar System which are too large to be considered asteroids or comets yet to small to be considered to be planets. Of the nine bodies currently classified as Dwarf Planets, only Ceres is located within the Main Asteroid Belt, with five lying in the Kuiper Belt (Orcus, Pluto, Haumea, Quaoar, and Makemake), two lie within the Scattered Disk (Gonggong and Eris), and one within the Detached Region on the outer fringe of the Solar System (Sedna).

See also...

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.


Monday, 17 August 2020

Ceres reaches aphelion.

The Dwarf Planet Ceres reached aphelion (the furthest point on its orbit to the Sun) at 8.11 am GMT on Monday 17 August 2020, when it was 2.98 AU (445 749 000 km) from the Sun. This is only 0.42 AU (62 945 000 km) more distant than the planet's perihelion (closest point on its orbit from the Sun), as Venus has one of the least eccentric circular orbits of any body in the Main Asteroid Belt.

 
The orbits of Ceres, Jupiter, Mars, Earth, Venus and Mercury, and their positions on 17 August 2020. In The Sky. 

Because Ceres is further from the Sun than the Earth, its orbital period is much longer than ours, with the Dwarf Planet completing one obit every 1683 days (4.65 years), on an eccentric orbit tilted at 10.6° to the plane of the Solar System. The orbit of Ceres places it within the inner part of the Main Asteroid Belt, but due to its large size, with a diameter of 939.4 km, it is considered to be a Dwarf Planet rather than an asteroid.

 
High resolution image of Ceres made on 20 September 2020, by the Dawn Space Probe. Wikimedia Commons/NASA/JPL/Caltech.

Ceres was discovered on 1 January 1801 by Giuseppe Piazzi, a Catholic priest at the Academy of Palermo, Sicily. It was the first body to be discovered in the Main Asteroid Belt, and at the time when it was discovered an international search was underway for a presumed 'missing planet' between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter (although Piazzi was studying stars when he first observed Ceres, and initially presumed he had found a new comet). Ceres was for a long time considered to be the largest asteroid in the Solar System, but in 2006 was re-classified as a Dwarf Planet, as part of a revision of the classification of Solar System bodies driven by the discovery of a growing number of bodies in the Outer Solar System which are too large to be considered asteroids or comets yet to small to be considered to be planets. Of the nine bodies currently classified as Dwarf Planets, only Ceres is located within the Main Asteroid Belt, with five lying in the Kuiper Belt (Orcus, Pluto, Haumea, Quaoar, and Makemake), two lie within the Scattered Disk (Gonggong and Eris), and one within the Detached Region on the outer fringe of the Solar System (Sedna).

See also...




















Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.


Wednesday, 6 May 2015

Measuring the size and shape of Ceres using stellar occulations.


Ceres is the largest body in the Main Asteroid Belt, containing approximately one fifth of the total mass found there. It is the only body in the Main Asteroid belt to be accorded the status of ‘Minor Planet’, which indicates that it is thought to be large enough to have adopted a roughly spherical shape due to its own gravity, but not large enough to have cleared all other material from its approximate orbit. The other bodies in our Solar System to have been designated as Minor Planets are all Kuiper Belt Objects such as Pluto, Eris and Makemake. This has profound implications for the structure of Ceres; while it is thought that the majority of Main Asteroid Belt objects are simply large rocks, or rubble piles held loosely together by microgravity, Ceres is thought likely to have a differentiated, layered structure which may contain ice layers or even liquid water beneath the surface.

Stellar occulations, situations in which a Solar System body passes in front of a star causing a measurable dimming of its light, are a powerful tool in the study of small Solar System bodies, and have been used to measure the sizes of a number of bodies in the Main Asteroid Belt and even the Kuiper Belt. The method relies on having a number of observatories on Earth measuring the dimming of the star, and using synchronized time recordings to compare the dimming observed from each station, in order to build a picture of its size and shape. This method has been used once previously to measure the size and shape of Ceres, when data from a 1984 occulation was used to determine that Ceres was an oblate spheroid (slightly flattened sphere), with an equatorial diameter of 959 km and an oblateness of 0.05 (i.e. its diameter measured on the north-south access is 5% smaller than its diameter measured at the equator). This is comparible to measurements obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope and Keck and Very Large Telescopes, but a little smaller and less oblate than these other observations suggest.

In a paper published the arXiv database at Cornell University Library on 20 April 2015, and in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society on 19 April 2015, a team of astronomers led by Altair Gomes-Júnior of the Observatório do Valongo in Rio de Janeiro, discuss the results obtained two further stellar occulations by Ceres, in August 2010 and October 2013.

On 17 August 2010 Ceres occulated the magnitude 11.55 star TYC 6833-163-1 (or UCAC4 313-111823); an occulation which was visible from the southern coastal area of Brazil. This was observed from five locations; Belo Horizonte CEAMIG, Pico dos Dias LNA, São José dos Campos INPE, Ponta Grossa UEPG and Florianópolis UFSC, though in the event Florianópolis turned out to be outside the area from which the occulation was visible and only part of the occulation was observed from São José dos Campos.

Post-occultation reconstruction of Ceres' shadow path on Earth for the 2010 August 17 event. The big red dot is the geocentric closest approach at 22:40:25 UT. The small red ones represent the centre of the shadow separated by one minute, shadow moves from the left to the right. Blue dots are the sites that have observed the event. UFSC had a negative chord. Gomes-Júnior et al. (2015).

All of the observations were made with instruments which used charged-couple devices to record the times with an accuracy good to within a few hundredths of a second. Since this was an exceptionally slow occulation, with the shadow of Ceres moving at velocity of 3.9 kilometres per second in the plane of the sky, and the observing stations were spaced evenly across the width of the observational area, this enabled very accurate measurements to be made, resulting in a calculated equatorial diameter of 972 km and an oblateness of 0.08.

The best elliptical fit for the occultation chords for the event of 2010 using the times and the pole constrained solution. The arrow indicates the direction of motion, blue lines are the observed chords, the red segments are the ingress, egress and mid-occultation error bars at 1σ level. Gomes-Júnior et al. (2015).

On 25 October 2013 Ceres occulated the magnitude 10.05 star TYC 865-911-1 (or UCAC4 496-058191), an event visible from much of the eastern United States. This was observed from nine locations, Hampton, Topsfield, Brookline, Winchester, Greenbelt, Alexandria, Owings, Mechanicsville and Varina.

Post-occultation reconstruction of Ceres' shadow path on Earth for the 2013 October 25 event at the east coast of USA. Upper view of the occultation over the sites that observed the event (blue dots). Red points are the centre of the shadow separated by 15 seconds. Gomes-Júnior et al. (2015).

On this occasion Ceres was moving much faster relative to the Earth, and its shadow travelled at a speed of 42.6 kilometers per second. For this reason all of the observations were made using video equipment, and timed in slightly different ways at different stations. At Greenbelt and Owings a GPS unit was used to directly insert a time stamp into each frame. At Brookline the time was inserted via an internet server, and at, Hampton, Topsfield, Winchester, Alexandria, Mechanicsville and Varina the event was initially timed with the internal clock on a camcorder and this was then calibrated with a GPS unit.

In the event the method used at Brookline proved to be a failure, with the internet server losing its connection and inserting a delay of about 64 seconds. The Brookline observations were not therefore used in the final calculations. The timings obtained from the Varina observations also appeared to be erroneous, possibly due to a failure of the camcorder timer and GPS timer to correspond properly, so this set of observations were also discarded. Finally the observations made from Owings also seem to be inaccurate, delayed relative to nearby observations from Alexandria and Greenbelt, but very close to those from Mechanicsville, about a hundred kilometres to the south. This is harder to explain as the time-stamp was inserted into the Owings observations directly be GPS, and Gomes-Júnior et al. suggest that it may have been caused by some surface feature on Ceres. The Owings observations were also excluded from the final calculations.

The best elliptical fit for the occultation chords for the event of 2013 using timing from Table 3 and the pole-constrained solution. The arrow indicates the direction of motion, blue lines are the observed chords, the red and green segments are the ingress, egress and mid-occultation error bars at 1σ level. The chords with green error bars were not used during the limb fit process. The chord of Brookline is shifted by -64s. Gomes-Júnior et al. (2015).

The 2013 North American Ceres occulation observations therefore contained data from more observation stations than any previous set of similar observations, but these were not well distributed and were particularly week compared to the asteroids southern hemisphere. Nevertheless Gomes-Júnior et al. were able to calculate the size and shape of Ceres from these observations, coming up with an equatorial diameter of 971 km and an oblateness of 0.08.

Combining the data from all the observations in the two studies Gomes-Júnior et al. were able to come up with an equatorial diameter of 972 km and an oblateness of 0.08 for Ceres. This is comparable to a 2014 study which used direct observations of the asteroid from Keck Observatory and the Very Large Telescope (equatorial diameter 967 km, oblateness 0.078), and a 2004 study using the Hubble Space Telescope (equatorial diameter 975 km, oblateness 0.067), but not so well with the previous 1984 occualtion study (equatorial diameter 959 km, oblateness 0.05) or a 2008 study using data from Keck Observatory alone (equatorial diameter 959 km, oblateness 0.074).

To some extent all of these observations are now spurious, as NASA’s Dawn Spacecraft has now moved into orbit around Ceres, and is likely to produce much more accurate observations and measurements of the asteroid in the near future. However this does provide a good test for the methodology involved, which has been used on a great number of other asteroids and Solar System bodies, the vast majority of which have no prospect of being visited by a space mission in the foreseeable future.

See also…

Asteroid 12 Victoria at opposition.
Asteroid 12 Victoria will reach opposition (i.e. will be directly opposite the Sun seen from Earth) at 0.07 am (seven minutes past midnight) GMT on Tuesday 9 September 2014. This means that it will both be at...

The Gibbs Family of Asteroids.
Asteroid families are groups of objects thought to have a common origin, typically the catastrophic break-up of a parent body at some remote point in the past, which has left a population of asteroids with similar orbital...

The orbit of Linus.
22 Kalliope is a 166.2 km Main Belt Asteroid with an 1814 day orbit that takes it from 2.62 AU from the Sun (2.62 times the distance at which the Earth orbits the Sun) to 3.20 AU. Unusually, but not exclusively, it has a small Moon, Linus, thought to be about 28 km in diameter. While other asteroids with Moons have been discovered, the positioning of 22 Kaliope within the...


Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Sunday, 23 March 2014

The origin of Ceres.

Ceres is the largest body in the Main Asteroid Belt, comprising roughly 1/3 of all the mass of the belt. It has the designation (1) Ceres, indicating that it was the first asteroid discovered  (by Giuseppe Piazzi in 1801), but has recently been declared to be a Dwarf Planet, due to its large size, a designation that places it in the same class of bodies as the Trans-Neptunian Objects Pluto, Haumea, Eris and Makemake. As such it is the subject of considerable interest to planetary scientists, and was one of two bodies chosen to be visited by NASA’s Dawn Mission, along with (4) Vesta, the second largest body in the Main Asteroid Belt.

The results of the Dawn Mission have revealed striking differences between the two bodies, with Vesta having a subspherical shape and a cratered, volcanic surface (much as was expected from an asteroid), but Ceres has an (unexpected) smooth, icy surface and a more-or-less spherical shape. Moreover Ceres is considerably less dense than Vesta (at 2.077 g cm¯³ compared to 3.456 g cm¯³ for Vesta), suggesting that the ice forms a significant proportion of its mass, rather than simply being a thin surface layer, and several points of cryovolcanic activity, where water vapour is being released from the surface at a rate of about 6 kg s¯¹ have been discovered.

The surface of Ceres. NASA/JPL/Dawn Mission.

The surface of Vesta. NASA/JPL/Dawn Mission.

In a paper published on the arXiv online database at Cornell University Library on 20 March 2014, Yury Rogozin of the VEDA LLC in Moscow speculates that Ceres may have begun it existence not as a Main Asteroid Belt object, but as the moon of a now destroyed planet beyond the snowline of the early Solar System (the snowline being the point beyond which it was cool enough for water-ice to form, not possible within the inner Solar System due to the heat from the early Sun), and that it may have reached its current position by interaction with the gravity of the giant planet Jupiter.

Rogozin cites as evidence of this the theory that the planets Mercury and Mars may also have started out as the satellites of larger bodies (a theory which is not currently widely supported among planetary scientists). That theory goes something like this: Mercury and Mars are significantly smaller than the other two rocky planets, Earth and Venus, but are of comparable size to the larger moons of the Solar System, such as Earth’s Moon, the four Galilean moons of Jupiter, Titan etc. Furthermore Mercury and Mars have greater orbital eccentricities than any other planets in the Solar System (i.e. their distance from the Sun varies more than that of other planets). This theory speculates that Mercury is an escaped moon of Venus, and that Mars was formerly a moon of the planet Phaeton, which existed within what is now the Main Asteroid Belt, but which was destroyed by the gravitational influence of Jupiter early in the history of the Solar System.

Rogozin reasons that Mercury is in a 5:2 orbital resonance with Venus (i.e. it completes five orbits four every two orbits of Venus), and Mars is in a 5:2 resonance with the (hypothetical) orbit of the former planet Phaeton. Therefore Ceres could be in a 5:2 orbital resonance with another now destroyed planet, which Rogozin names Yurus, which would therefore have had a semi major axis (average orbital distance from the Sun) of 5.0951 AU (i.e. 5.0951 times the distance at which the Earth orbits the Sun), and an orbital period of 11.5 years.

The orbit of Ceres. JPL Small Body Database Browser.

Rogozin further suggests that the destruction of a large icy planet in such an orbit might account for the large volumes of water present on Earth and now believed to formerly have been present on Mars, both planets which are thought to have formed within the snow line, and which might therefore be expected to be largely waterless.

While the idea that Ceres may have formed beyond the early Solar System’s snow line has some merit, the existence of the planet Yurus seems highly speculative. The separation of Mercury and Mars from the other rocky planets as moon-like objects is not widely supported among planetary scientists. While Mercury is of similar size to several moons, Mars is in fact of intermediate size between these bodies and the larger rocky planets, and studies of other stellar systems have revealed a variety of rocky planets of intermediate sizes. Therefore most planetary scientists now either regard the four rocky planets as a discreet group, or use a grouping of ‘rocky worlds’ which includes the four planets, plus the fifteen largest moons in the Solar System.

The destruction of a large icy planet at a distance of 5.0951 AU from the Sun would be easy to explain, due to the closeness of such a planet to the orbit of Jupiter, a body which will excerpt considerable tidal stress on any nearby body, which has a semi major axis of 5.204267 AU, and which at its perihelion (the closest point in its orbit to the Sun) is only 4.950429 AU from the Sun; however the formation of a planet in such a position would require considerable explanation for the same reason, and explanation that Rogozin does not provide. The presence of water on Earth and Mars is more usually explained by hypothesizing a large number of comet impacts during the early history of the Solar System (the Early Bombardment Theory); comets that are thought to have formed in the outer parts of the Solar System, safely beyond the snow line.

Furthermore the speed at which a body orbits the Sun, and its distance from the Sun, are usually thought to be connected, with bodies that accelerate or slow in their orbits correspondingly moving towards or away from the Sun. Orbital resonances are usually explained by the exchange of inertia between bodies. A faster body approaching a slower body in a similar orbit will impart some of its inertia to it via tidal exchange, causing the slower body to accelerate and the faster body to slow down. The bodies will continue to exchange energy each time they pass, with one body accelerating and the other slowing each time they pass, until they reach a stable resonance. 

Several bodies within the Solar System (and in other known planetary systems) are in such resonances, most notably the three inner Galilean moons of Jupiter, which have a 4:2:1 orbital resonance. Where two bodies are in similar orbits but cannot reach a stable resonance, it is predicted that one of them will be expelled into a quite different orbit. Thus an origin of Ceres as a fifth large moon of Jupiter, unable to form a stable resonance with the other four Galilean moons and therefore expelled from the Jovian system by tidal forces, would present an alternative theory for the origin of Ceres (and an equally hypothetical one). The presence of an icy body in the Jovian system requires no explanation, as Jupiter is beyond the snow line, and has several icy moons.

The icy surface of the Jovian moon Europa. NASA/Galileo.


Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Thursday, 21 July 2011

Pluto gains a fourth moon.

NASA scientists announced this week (20 July 2011) that they had discovered a new moon around the dwarf planet Pluto. The discovery was made by scientists using the Hubble Space Telescope in a set of five long exposure pictures taken over a period of two months and is referred to as 'P4' or 'S/2011 p1'. The moon has since been identified in earlier Hubble images, from 2006 and 2010.
The Pluto system as we currently understand it, incorporating the new moon P4.

Pluto was discovered in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh, a young astronomer working at the Lowell Observatory in Arizona; its existence had been predicted as early as 1909, due to anomalies in the orbit of Neptune. At the time it was assumed that Pluto was a planet of some size, capable of disturbing the orbit of Neptune. Pluto spends part of its 248 earth year orbit inside the orbit of Neptune; this is not the same on every orbit, but alternates between a 20 and a 14 year stay.

In 1979 the first moon of Pluto was discovered by James Christy at the United States Naval Observatory. Dubbed 'Charon' it enabled scientists to make an estimate of the size of Pluto; to their surprise they found it has only 2% of the mass of Earth or 18% of that of the moon, making it far to small to affect the orbit of Neptune, re-starting the hunt for new planets in the outer solar-system. In fact it is now understood that (due to orbital effects) Pluto passes closer to Uranus than it ever does to Neptune. Charon is so large (relative to Pluto) that their mutual centre of gravity, the point about which they both rotate, is 2040 km above the surface of Pluto; they are the only known planet/moon system for which this is true (671 Patroclus is a pair of asteroids orbiting a mutual centre of gravity at Jupiter's trailing Lagrangian Point, but these are nothing like planets), and for this reason some scientists suggest they should be referred to as a pair of binary planets rather than a planet and its moon. Charon has a mass 2% that of the moon (1520 × 10¹⁸ kg) and a diameter of 1205 km. It orbits the systems centre of gravity at a distance of 17 530 km.

The Pluto/Charon system.

In 2004 another Pluto-like object was located in the outer solar system by a team led by Mike Brown at the California Institute of Technology (this is disputed; José Luis Ortiz Moreno of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andelucía and his team at the Sierra Nevada Observatory in Grenada, Spain). Haumea has only a third the mass of Pluto, and orbits slightly further out, but it confirmed what scientists were beginning to suspect, that the outer solar system might contain a number of such objects.


An artists impression of Haumea. It is ellipsoid in shape and has a distinctive red patch. These cannot be directly imaged, but are the best interpretation of the available data on Haumea.

In 2005 Mike Brown's team working at Caltech's Palomar Observatory discovered two further objects in the outer solar system.

Makemake is similar to Haumea, roughly third the mass of Pluto, and further out, but the other new object, Eris, was more interesting. Eris is half again as far from the sun as Pluto - and a third again as big. Clearly if Pluto is a planet, then Eris is too.

Hubble images of Eris and it's moon Dysnomia.

Since it was likely that there are many more objects of this size in the outer solar system many astronomers were becoming uncomfortable with the term 'planet' to describe them. Thus in 2006 the International Astronomical Union settled on the term 'Dwarf Planet', to designate objects large enough to form a roughly spherical shape under their own gravity, but no so massive as to have cleared the area around their orbit of all other objects. Pluto, Haumea, Makemake, and Eris were placed in this category, as was Ceres in the asteroid belt. Ceres had also been classified as a planet at the time of its discovery in 1801, as were a number of other asteroids until the mid-nineteenth century, when it became clear that asteroids were too abundant to be classed as planets.

Also in 2005 two more moons of Pluto were discovered by the Hubble Space Telescope Pluto Companion Search Team. Nix and Hydra are further out and smaller than Charon, but orbit the same centre of gravity, so logically if Charon should be considered a planet, then so should Nix and Hydra. This is rather more problematic, as Nix is only 91 km in diameter and Hydra 114 km. Nix orbits the system's centre of gravity at 48 708 km and Hydra at 64 749 km.

The new moon, S/2011 p1, orbits the same centre of gravity as the rest of the system and therefore logically could also potentially be considered a planet, despite having a radius of between 14 and 34 km. It orbits between Nix and Hydra, at a distance of about 59 000 km.

Clearly the Pluto system is something very different to anything in the inner solar system, a cloud of objects more than a planet with satellites. Some scientists theorize that this may be the result of a collision early in the solar system's history, in the same way that Earth's moon (larger in comparison to its parent body than any other moon in the solar system except Charon) is thought to be the result of a collision between the early Earth and a Mars-sized object.

The images we have at the moment, even those taken with our best telescopes, are still pretty faint. In July 2015 NASA's New Horizon spacecraft is due to reach Pluto and will hopefully bring us far more information, and probably a good few more surprises.

See also Visiting Vesta and Dwarf Planets on Sciency Thoughts Youtube.

Monday, 18 July 2011

Visiting Vesta

On the 16th of July 2011 the NASA space probe Dawn moved into orbit around the asteroid Vesta, 188 million km from the Earth, where it will remain for the next year.

An artist's impression of the Dawn space probe.

Vesta was discovered by German astronomer Heinrich Wilhelm Olbers in 1807, the forth object to be discovered in what we now call the Asteroid Belt. It has a diameter of about 530 km and is the second most massive object in the belt, potentially containing 9% of the total mass of the Asteroid Belt. Vesta orbits at a distance of 2.5 AU (i.e. 2.5 times as far from the sun as the Earth is). It is roughly spherical in shape, but is slightly to small to be considered a dwarf planet. Scientists believe that its shape indicates that it underwent at least partial melting early in its history, due to the decay of radioactive elements in its core - the same process that keeps the interior of the Earth molten. Vesta has a number of prominent craters, most notably the 460 km diameter (80% of that of the whole asteroid) at it's south pole.

Vesta.

The Dawn probe is designed to shed light on the early development of the solar system by examining Vesta and Ceres, the two largest objects in the asteroid belt, both of which are thought to be relatively unchanged since their formation, early in the history of the system. The Dawn probe is powered by an ion drive, a new technology which has the potential to vastly improve our ability to explore the solar system. The drive uses two large solar panels to ionize Xenon gas, which is then fired through an electric field creating thrust. This generates less thrust than a conventional rocket engine, but is much smaller and can maintain thrust for much longer, making it a far more efficient system as long as you do not wish to get anywhere in a hurry.

A diagrammatic representation of the ion drive which powers the Dawn probe.

See also Asteroid 2011MD.