Pages

Saturday, 26 March 2016

Teyujagua paradoxa: An Archosauromorph from the Early Triassic of Rio Grande do Sul State in Southern Brazil.

The Archosauriformes, the group which includes the Birds, Dinosaurs, Crocodilians, and Pterosaurs, are thought to have first appeared during the Middle Permian, and rose to dominate global terrestrial faunas during the Triassic. However, despite over a century of intense study by palaeontologists, the origins of the group remain somewhat obscure. The earliest known fossils assigned to the group come from the Late Permian of Russia, though these are fragmentary in nature and yield little information, as are most of the Early Triassic fossils from around the world.

In a paper published in the journal Nature: Scientific Reports on 11 March 2015, Felipe Pinheiro of the Laboratório de Paleobiologia at the Universidade Federal do Pampa, Marco França of the Laboratório de Paleontologia e Evolução de Petrolina at the Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Marcel Lacerda of the Laboratório de Paleontologia de Vertebrados at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Richard Butler of the School of Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences at the University of Birmingham, and Cesar Schultz, also of the Laboratório de Paleontologia de Vertebrados at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, describe a new species of Archosauromorph (the wider group from which the Archosauriformes are thought to have arisen, defined as any Diapsid more closely related to the Archosauriformes than it is to the Lepidosaurs - Lizards etc.) from the Early Triassic Sanga do Cabral Formation of Rio Grande do Sul State in Southern Brazil, and discuss its relationship to the Archosauriformes.

 The new species is named Teyujagua paradoxa, where 'Teyujagua' refers to Teyú Yaguá, a mythical beast from the mythology of the Guarani people, traditionally depicted as a Dog-headed Lizard, and 'paradoxa' means 'paradoxical', in reference to the unusual and unexpected combination of features seen in the specimen. The species is described from an almost complete skull and four cervical (neck) vertebrae, 115 mm in length, still partially covered by the surrounding rock matrix in some areas. 

 Teyujagua paradoxa. Photographs and interpretative drawings in right lateral (A,B) and dorsal (C,D) views. Abbreviations: an, angular; dt, dentary; emf, external mandibular fenestra; fr, frontal; ju, jugal; la, lacrimal; mx, maxilla; na, nasal; pa, parietal; pmx, premaxilla; po, postorbital; pofr, postfrontal; prf, prefrontal; q, quadrate; q j, quadratojugal; rap, retroarticular process; sa, surangular; sq, squamosal; st, supratemporal. J Anderson in Pinheiro et al. (2016).

Teyujagua paradoxa has a flattened snout with nostrils on its upper surface, a feature seen in many Crocodyliforms (advanced Archosauriformes) and also in Rhynchosaurs, an Archosauromorph group thought to be closely related to the Archosauriformes. The skull has a greatly reduced pineal foramen (skull opening between the eyes), the loss of which is also associated with Archosauriformes (it was fonerly thought that all Archosauriformes lacked a pineal foramen, though some early members of the group have new been shown to have a small opening). Teyujagua paradoxa has trapezoidal infratemporal openings which are bordered bellow by incomplete lower temporal bars, a situation seen in a variety of non-Archosauriforme Archosauromorphs, though it is more common in groups less cloesly related to the Achosuariformes.

The teeth of Teyujagua paradoxa are set in well defined sockets (as in Mammals and some early Archosauromorph groups), rather than growing from the directly from the bone (a trait that allows the constant replacement of teeth seen in Crocodyliforms and Dinosaurs) as in early (and most subsequent) Archosauriformes. Teyujagua paradoxa also shows heterodont dentition (the development of different sized and shaped teeth in different parts of the jaw), a trait common in Mammals and other Cyndonts (the larger group from which Mammals arrose, and only very distantly related to the Archosauromorphs), but only seen in a few highly specialized advanced Dinosaurs.

A phylogenetic analysis carried out by Pinheiro et al. using the TNT softeware package recovered Teyujagua paradoxa as the sister taxa to the Archosauroformes (i.e. all Archosuaroformes are more closely related to one-another than they are to Teyujagua paradoxa, but more closely related to Teyujagua paradoxa than to any other non-Archosauriforme Archosauromorph). This close relationship suggests that although it is not an Archosauriforme, Teyujagua paradoxa is an important discovert for understanding the origins and early history of that group.

Archosauromorph phylogeny showing the recovered position of Teyujagua. Top: strict consensus tree summarising phylogenetic results. Bottom: sequence of acquisition of Archosauriform features among the Archosauromorphs Prolacerta, Teyujagua and the basal Archosauriform Proterosuchus. (i) serrated teeth; (ii) external mandibular fenestra; (iii) closed lower temporal bar; (iv) antorbital fenestra. Prolacerta and Proterosuchus skulls redrawn from an artwork by Martin Ezcurra. Not to scale.

See also...

http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/dinosauriformarchosaurs-and-theropod.htmlDinosauriform Archosaurs and Theropod Dinosaurs from the Late Triassic of southwest Poland.                                                  Dinosaurs emerged during the last 30 million years...
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/bone-pathology-in-triassic-phytosaur.htmlBone pathology in a Triassic Phytosaur. Palaeopathology is the study of disease and injuries in fossil remains. The way in which an organism responds to infection can tell biologists a lot about its ecology and lifestyle, and this is more true of palaeobiologists...
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/tooth-microwear-in-silesaurid.htmlTooth microwear in a Silesaurid Archosaur. The Silesaurids are considered to be the sister group to the Dinosaurs; that is to say they are the group of animals considered to be the closest relatives of the Dinosaurs, without actually being classed as Dinosaurs. They are known only from the Middle to Late...
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.