The world is currently suffering from multiple interconnected environmental crises, including a rapid loss of biodiversity in many parts of the world. Madagascar, a global biodiversity hotspot with a large number of species found nowhere else, is considered to be particularly at risk, due to unprecedented rates of habitat loss. However, tracking this loss is challenging, as monitoring species loss involves a large amount of labour intensive work by specialist taxonomic experts, often involving access to expensive equipment.
Environmental DNA offers a potential way to reduce this workload, allowing for monitoring to be carried out by non-specialist staff collecting samples of sediment, water or even air. Since such methods to not require direct observation of threatened species, they are far less environmentally intrusive.
Nile Crocodiles, Crocodylus niloticus, were persecuted across their range by hunters seeking their skins, as well as harvesting of their eggs, until the mid-twentieth century. Since this time, the population has recovered in many parts of Africa due to conservation efforts. In Madagascar, the species is monitored by the Malagasy Crocodile Management Unit, which aims not just to establish the recovery of the species, but to minimise Human-Crocodile conflicts by helping people and livestock to avoid potentially lethal Crocodile encounters.
Previous work using environmental DNA has succeeded in detecting Crocodiles kept under laboratory conditions, but struggled to locate them in the wild, although methods such as water sweeps have proven more successful.
In a paper published in the journal Biodiversity and Conservation on 23 October 2025, Mai Fahmy of the Department of Undergraduate Biololgy at Stony Brook University, and the Division of Invertebrate Zoology at the American Museum of Natural History, Soja Manjakamanana Zafimanaoela of the Université d’Antananarivo, Njakamamapiadana Mamenofahasoavana Rinah and Jerison William Ranaivosolo of Stony Brook University's Centre ValBio in Madagascar, Noel Rowe of Primate Conservation Inc., Patricia Wright, also of the Centre ValBio, and of the Department of Anthropology and Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences at Stony Brook University, and Evon Hekkala, also of the Department of Undergraduate Biololgy at Stony Brook University, and the Division of Vertebrate Zoology at the American Museum of Natural History, present the results of a study, in which they attempted to detect Crocodiles in Madagascar using sediment samples as well as specialist environmental DNA filters and Coffee filters, in an attempt to find a cost-effective method of detecting the Animals.
Anivorano lake in northern Madagascar, traditionally held to be sacred. Here the local population periodically sacrifices Zebu Cattle to the Crocodiles, which are believed to contain the spirits of pas chiefs, in a ceremony that also involves dancing and singing. On such occasions, the Crocodiles are fed beef from a beach about 30 m long near a sacred tree, and subsequently typically remain in the area for about eight hours, basking on the beach or in the water.
Fahmy et al. collected sediment from a belly print left on the beach by a Crocodile, Crocodile faecal matter, and water from an area close to where Crocodiles were basking. The water and faecal samples were subsequently passed through Coffee filters, which were retained.
At the Ankarana Special Reserve, also in northern Madagascar, Fahmy et al. collected sediment samples from the river mouth leading into the Ankarana Cave System, with two samples collected from the footprints of Crocodiles, one adult and one juvenile. Water was also collected from a flooded cave entrance, and again filtered through a coffee filter.
Water samples were also collected from the Ihosy, Mananantanana, and Matitanana rivers in central and southeastern Madagascar, and filtered through specialist environmental DNA filters. These are wide, fast flowing rivers, used exclusively by the local population for transport, hygiene, and watering livestock. Samples were taken following sightings of Crocodiles, and only with the explicit permission of local communities.
Finally, four samples were collected from a submerged cave located in Tsimanampesotse National Park in southwest Madagascar. Nile Crocodiles have never been observed in these caves, although they are known to inhabit the nearby Onalahy River. The caves were, however, utilised by the extinct Madagascan Horned Crocodile, Voay robustus, which is thought to have died out about 1250 years ago. These samples were again filtered through Coffee filters. A sediment sample was also collected from beneath a subfossil Horned Crocodile in the caves.
A total of seventeen samples were collected and processed. Four of the samples were subsequently discarded because they were found to contain only Human DNA, and one because it contained Sheep DNA. In the remaining samples, the greatest number of species were recovered from the Coffee filter samples; although this did not represent the greatest diversity. Sediment and environmental DNA samples produced equal numbers of species, although greater overall diversity was recorded in the sediment samples. DNA associated with members of the Family Podicipedidae (Grebes) was recovered exclusively in the environmental DNA filters, while DNA associates with the Family Naididae (Tubifex Worms) was recovered exclusively from sediment samples.
Crocodile DNA was recovered from both sediment samples and Coffee filters, but not from specialist environmental DNA filters. However, Fahmy et al. do not suggest that this is because Coffee filters are superior to environmental DNA filters, as the later were only used to filter water samples from fast flowing rivers, where recovering Crocodile DNA is known to be difficult.
Three samples yielded Crocodile DNA, all from Lake Anivorano. These included the sediment sample taken from the Crocodile belly print, and the Coffee filters through which the faecal sample and water from close to Crocodiles basking in the lake were filtered. The analysis recovered these as belonging to the genus Crocodylus, and most likely as coming from Nile Crocodiles, Crocodylus niloticus, with a lower chance of coming from Orinoco Crocodiles, Crocodylus intermedius, of American Crocodiles, Crocodylus acutus, neither of which are found in Madagascar.
The three most abundant species in the results were Cattle, Bos taurus, Chickens, Gallus gallus, and Domestic Pigs, Sus scrofa. Also detected were Ring-tailed Lemur, Lemur catta, and an unknown species of Grebe (Podicepepidae). This could not be identified to species level, although several Grebes are known from Madagascar, including the Little Grebe, Tachybaptus ruficollis, and the Madagascar Grebe, Tachybaptus pelzelnii. Interestingly, the Madagascar Grebe does not have any genetic material recorded in the GenBank database, against which the samples were compared.
The method developed by Fahmy et al. did not establish the presence of Crocodiles in anywhere they were not known to occur, but did establish that it was possible to detect Crocodiles using environmental DNA in Madagascar, and that it was possible to use Coffee filters as a means of recovering environmental DNA, a much cheaper option than specialist filters.
See also...





.png)





.png)

.jpg)

.png)



.png)


.jpg)






.png)
.png)









.png)









.png)
.png)






.png)