Morphometric analysis is a method used by palaeontologists to sort
bones and shells into taxonomic and ecological groups. It relies on comparing
the ratios of different measurements to one-another rather than simply
assigning the samples to groups based upon their obvious shape. Such analyses
have proved to be powerful tools for understanding certain groups, particularly
Molluscs, which tend to have highly pre-determined growth patterns allowing the
confident assignment of shells to taxa, and Mammals, which are often able to
modify their bones within their lifetimes in response to environmental factors.
In a forthcoming paper in the journal Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
available online from 23 September 2014, Carlo Meloro of the Research Centre inEvolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology at Liverpool John Moores University
and Julien Louys of the Department of Archaeology and Natural History at the
Australian National University attempt to apply morphometric analysis to a
series of Canid (Dog) radii from palaeontological sites in East Africa from
which Hominid remains have been recovered and extensively studied.
The remains used in the study were a complete left radius from Koobi
Fora dated to between 2.6 and 2.0 million years old, a proximal fragment of a
left radius from Olduvai dated to between 1.75 and 1.749 million years old, and
a distal fragment of a right radius from Olduvai, dated to between 1.7 and 1.2
million years old. Whilst some of these specimens were assigned to taxa when
they were discovered (all three bones were tentatively assigned to the
Black-backed Jackal, Canis mesomelas),
none of these classifications is thought valid as it is not currently accepted
that Canid remains can be confidently assigned to taxa from isolated
post-cranial bones.
Since ecomorphological studies of Canid bones have not been
previously attempted, Meloro and Louys first examined a series of 92 radii
belonging to 24 extant species of Canids in order to build up a data-set. This
data-set was used to establish a statistical range for different Canid taxa
thought to be reasonably reliable to genus level, as well as two sets of
ecological data based upon prey size and habitat.
Measurement scheme for the canid radius, illustrated
using a right radius of Canis lupus, in
posterior (A), distallateral (B), proximal (C1) and distal (C2) posterior,
proximal (D1) and distal (D2) lateralviews, proximal view of radius head (E),
distal view of radius lower extremity (F). Meloro & Louys (2014).
Meloro and Louys established three prey size catagories within their
modern data-set. Firstly a small-prey category that includes Foxes, small
Jackals and similar species. Then a large-prey category that includes Wolves,
African Hunting Dogs, Dingoes and Dholes (Indian Hunting Dogs). Finally a
small-to-medium sized prey category that includes all other Canids.
They also established three categories based upon habitat
classification; open for species where 60% or more of the species range exists
in open grassland, closed for species that had 60% or more of their range
within forested environments, and mixed for intermediate species.
Using this data-set Meloro and Louys are confident that the Koobi Fora
specimen comes from a member of the genus Canis(which
includes, Wolves, Coyotes, Jackals, Domestic Dogs and Dingos), and that it
hunted small-to-medium prey in a mixed or open environment.
The proximal radius from Olduvai was predicted to have come from a
member of the genus Lycaon, (the only
extant member of which is the African Hunting Dog or Painted Dog, Lycaon pictus), and that it hunted
small-to-medium prey in an open environment. This points to an animal closely
related to the modern African Hunting Dog, but with a slightly different
ecological niche; the modern Hunting Dog primarily hunts large prey in open
environments (some recent studies have suggested that Hunting Dogs may have
better hunting success in wooded environments, but that is thought to be
because of human disturbance of their natural habitat).
A modern African Hunting Dog, Lycaon pictus. Dmitrij Rodionov/Wikimedia Commons.
However Meloro and Louys note that the analysis used on this specimen
(which excludes measurements that it was not possible to take due to the
partial nature of the bone) produced a different result for the Koobi Fora
specimen, suggesting that it hunted large prey in a mixed environment, which
implies caution needs to be used when interpreting partial Canid specimens in
this way.
The second Olduvai specimen, the distal end of a right radius, was
found to be a member of the genus Canis,
and to have hunted small-to-medium prey in a mixed environment. The same
analysis used on the Koobi Fora specimen suggested that it hunted
small-to-medium prey in an open environment, consistent with the results
achieved with the complete specimen.
All three specimens were originally referred to the Black-backed
Jackal, Canis mesomelas, a small
Canine (Canids are split into two subfamilies, the larger Canines or Dogs, and
the smaller Vulpines, or Foxes, though all South American species, regardless
of size, are thought to belong to the Vulpine group) hunting small-to-medium
prey in open environments, and while later authorities have challenged this,
most have suggested they belong to a ‘Jackal-lineage’. More recent studies
based upon genetic analysis have shown that there is no single Jackal-lineage,
but the various species described as Jackals are the result of convergent
evolution in the genus Canis in
response to similar environmental conditions. Morphometric analysis of the
specimens suggests that two belong to the genus Canis, while one belongs to the closely related Lycoan, and that all hunted
small-to-medium prey in mixed or open environments, consistent with Jackal-like
behaviour.
See also…
Foxes (Vulpini) are a subgroup of the Dog Family, Canidae, found in
North America, Eurasia and Africa (South American Foxes are a separate
group, more closely related to True Dogs than to other Foxes). The...
Dogs are our oldest domestic animal, and the only one which predates the
adoption of agriculture. This has led to a great deal of study of the
origin of domestic dogs over the years. Despite this we are still not
entirely sure where dogs were first domesticated. We are now confident
that domestic dogs are descended from a...
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.
