Showing posts with label Greenland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greenland. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 January 2024

Timorebestia koprii: A giant stem-group Chaetognath from the Early Cambrian Sirius Passet Lagerstätte of Peary Land, North Greenland.

The Cambrian Explosion was marked by a sudden radiation of numerous Animal taxa, and the simultaneous expansion into numerous ecological roles. Exactly why this started remains unclear, but the evolution of predatory behaviour and the subsequent arms race between predators and prey is considered to be a significant part of the subsequent rapid evolutionary divergence. The 'explosion' is now recognised to have had three distinct steps; the appearance of Worm-like organisms in the terminal Ediacaran, the appearance of hard parts in the earliest Cambrian, and an rapid evolutionary diversification which produced the majority of modern phyla in Cambrian Stage 3.

Chaetognaths, or Arrow Worms, may have been the first group of Bilaterian Animals to specialise in hunting within the water column, with the Paraconadonts of the Earliest Cambrian now recognised as the grasping spines of early Chaetognaths. Amiskwia sagittiformis, a Burgess Shale fossil first described by Charles Doolittle Walcott in 1911, shows a strong similarity to modern Chaetognaths, possessing a roughly tubular body with paired lateral and tail fins. Despite this, it was for a long time thought unlikely to be a Chaetognath, as no specimen had ever been found with grasping spines, considered to be a key feature of the group. However, recent studies of these fossils have shown that they have an internal jaw apparatus, similar to that seen in Gnathiferans, a group which phylogenetic studies have suggested are closely related to the Chaetognaths, with the two forming a single clade, the Chaetognathifera. This combination of Chaetognath-like paired lateral and tail fins with an Gnathiferan-like internal jaw apparatus, raises interesting questions about the origin of these groups; where the two traits present in the ancestors of all Chaetognathiferans? Or was Amiskwia sagittiformis a member of one lineage that had had convergently gained a trait associated with the other? Understanding the answer to this question could have implications for our understanding of not just the origins of the four modern phyla, the Chaetognatha, Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and Rotifera.

In a paper published in the journal Science Advances on 3 January 2023, a team of scientists led by Tae-Yoon Park of the Division of Earth Sciences at the Korea Polar Research Institute, and the University of Science and Technology, describe a new, giant, stem-group Chaetognath from the Early Cambrian Sirius Passet Lagerstätte of Peary Land, North Greenland, and discuss its implications for the origin of the group.

The new species is named Timorebestia koprii, where 'Timorebestia' means 'fear-inducing beast' (it also appears to be a reference to Robert Burn's line 'timorous beastie', from the poem 'To a Mouse', though this is not stated), and 'koprii' derives from KOPRI, the acronym for the Korea Polar Research Institute. The species is descibed from 13 specimens collected from several horizons at the main Sirius Passet Lagerstätte locality; specimens were found over 12 m of exposure, although most were from within a particular fossiliferous interval of between 5 m and 7 m.

Holotype (MGUH 34286) of Timorebestia koprii. (A) to (C) Entire specimen. (D) and (E) Jaw apparatus in the anterior region of trunk. (A) Wavelength-dispersive x-ray spectrometry map of carbon on the specimen surface. (B) Polynomial texture mapping visualization using specular enhancement, illuminated from top left. (C) Interpretative drawing. (D) Carbon map of jaw apparatus indicating some indistinct enrichment of carbon within it. (E) Polynomial texture mapping image illuminated from top left of jaw apparatus. (F) Interpretative drawing of jaw apparatus based on tracing of multiple illumination angles. Abbreviations: Bp, basal plate; Lb, lateral bars; Jw, jaw; Ja, jaw apparatus; G, gut; Tm, transverse muscles; Fr, fin rays; Ps, posterior structure; Lm, longitudinal muscles. Park et al. (2024).

Timorebestia koprii is a wide bodied 'Amiskwiiform' with lateral fins running along the majority of the length of its trunk and a well-developed rounded caudal fin; these fins are rayed, with no division between the trunk and caudal fins. It's fore-end has a distinct tapering 'head' with paired antennae. An internal jaw apparatus is preserved as a pair of blunt anterior elements, and a single anterior plate. longitudinal bands of discrete muscles can be seen in the trunk, as well as additional outer circular or transverse muscles, although these are much more sparse. A digestive tract can be seen running from the head to just in front of the caudal fin.

Additional specimens of Timorebestia koprii (A) MGUH 34287, the largest preserved individual imaged with high dynamic range based on multiple images taken with different incident illumination angles while submerged in water. (B) Interpretative drawing. (C) MGUH 34288, another very large individual preserving less detail in low angle illumination. (D) High dynamic range image. (E) Interpretative drawing. (F) MGUH 34289, laterally preserved specimen. (G) Interpretative drawing. Abbreviations: An, antennae; Cr, caudal region; Hd, head; Mu, muscles; Mgc, mineralized gut contents; G, gut; Tr, trunk. Park et al. (2024).

Timorebestia koprii shows considerable variation in size, with the smallest being about 22 mm in length, while the largest is an incomplete specimen with a preserved bodylength of 206 mm, plus 92 mm antennae, giving a total preserved length of 298 mm, and an estimated original length in excess of over 300 mm. This is remarkable, as most extant Chaetognaths are only a few millimetres in length, while the largest living species, Pseudosagitta gazellae, reaches about 10 cm in length, similar to the largest described fossil species to date, Capinatator praetermissus, from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia.

Digital 3D model of Timorebestia koprii. Reconstruction showing internal and external anatomy (red, musculature; blue, ventral ganglion; black, jaw apparatus; green, gut). (A) Lateral view. (B) Dorsal view. (C) Ventral view. (D) Ventral view excluding musculature. Park et al. (2024).

Timorebestia koprii shares a general bodyplan with Amiskwia sagittiformis, which is not seen in any extant group of Gnathiferans. Since Amiskwia sagittiformis was the first discovered organism with this bodyplan, Park et al. refer to these Animals as 'Amiskwiiforms'. They also note the presence of another, as yet unnamed stem-Chaetognath in the Sirius Passet Lagerstätte, which does have external grasping spines, and is interpreted as being closer to the crown group than either Timorebestia koprii or Amiskwia sagittiformis. Thus it is assumed that an internal jaw apparatus is the ancestral state in Chaetognaths and Gnathiferans. The accessory pair of transverse elements within these internal jaws resembles the uncus elements of Rotifers (which are closely related to Chaetognaths and Gnathiferans). The external transverse or circular muscles seen in Amiskwiiforms are absent in modern Chaetognaths, however, Rotifers and Mictognanozoans have strong circular muscles and Gnathostomulids have numerous, but much thinner circular muscles, similar to those seen in Timorebestia koprii, suggesting that this might be the ancestral trait in Chaetognathiferans. Both Timorebestia koprii and the unnamed Sirius Passet species show phosphatized structures which appear to be a ventral ganglion with lateral neuron somata, something which strongly suggests they are more closely related to Chaetognaths than to other groups. A phylogenetic analysis carried out by Park et al. suggests that Timorebestia koprii and Amiskwia sagittiformis are the earliest (known) branching taxa on the Chaetognath branch of the Chaetognathiferan tree.

Ventral ganglion comparisons and phylogenetic relationships. (A) and (B) Timorebestia koprii MGUH 34290 and an interpretative drawing highlighting the presence of a paired set of bilobed structures (arrowed), mineralized by phosphate interpreted as lateral neuron somata of a ventral ganglion. (C) and (D) A small undescribed Chaetognath from Sirius Passet, MGUH 34299, preserving the ventral ganglion (arrowed) as paired phosphatized structures. (E) to (G) Confocal laser scanning microscope images of the extant Chaetognath Sagitta sp. (E) Histochemical labelling of nuclei (blue) and α-tubulin (green). (F) Same view as in (E), with only immunolocalization nuclei (blue). (G) Magnified view of the ventral nerve centre and the lateral neuron somata (arrowed) enriched in nuclei (blue). (H) Summary of phylogenetic analysis placing Timorebestia koprii on the Chaetognath stem. Schematic reconstructions at the tips indicate relative association of the jaw apparatus, pedal ganglion in Rotifers, and ventral ganglion. Park et al. (2024).

The large size of Timorebestia koprii is surprising; the largest known specimen of Amiskwia sagittiformis is only about 35 mm long, while the previous largest known fossil Chaetognath, Capinatator praetermissus from the Burgess Shale reaches only about 100 mm, comparable to the size of the largest living species, Pseudosagitta gazellae. The large size of Timorebestia koprii makes it one of the largest Early Cambrian pelagic species, which in combination with its complex swimming apparatus and long antennae, would probably have made it a top predator in its environment, an interpretation which is supported by the presence of the Bivalved Arthropod Isoxys volucris within the digestive tract of many specimens.

Reconstruction of Timorebestia koprii in the pelagic ecosystem preserved in Sirius Passet. Other taxa shown in the foreground are Kiisortoqia, Siricaris, Kerygmachela, Pauloterminus, Kleptothule, and Isoxys. Further in the background are two Radiodonts: Tamisiocaris and an Amplectobeluid. Robert Nicholls in Park et al. (2024).

This is surprising, as Chaetognaths are close to the bottom of the food chain in modern oceans, feeding on tiny zooplankton and, in the case of the largest species, very small Fish. However, they are one of (if not the) earliest pelagic predatory groups to appear, with Paraconadonts such as Protohertzina appearing in the oldest Cambrian deposits, so it is perhaps unsurprising that they were for a time the top predators in the Cambrian oceans. The first Panarthropods are thought to have colonised the water column around the transition from Cambrian Stage 2 to Cambrian Stage 3, or roughly 525 to 522 million years ago. The Sirius Passet Lagerstätte is thought to be between 523 and 518 million years old, making it a window into a time when one ecological realm was replacing another, including the replacement of Chaetognaths as top pelagic predators by the emerging Panarthropods.

See also...

Online courses in Palaeontology

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.


Tuesday, 13 September 2022

Portfjeldia aestatis: An enigmatic tubular microfossil from the Late Ediacaran Portfjeld Formation of North Greenland.

The Late Ediacaran layers of the Portfjeld Formation of North Greenland produce an array of phosphatised microfossils, including embryo-like forms, comparable to those from the Doushantuo Biota of Weng’an in South China, Acritarchs, Cyanobacteria, and some enigmatic helically coiled threads which have tentatively also been assigned to the Cyanobacteria.

Tubular and cylindrical fossils are comparatively common in the Proterozoic. Macroscopic forms begin in the Mesoproterozoic (1600 to 1000 million years ago) with fossils such as the carbonaceous Tawuia, which first appears in the Chorat Sandstone of Central India and persists into the Ediacaran, with a more diverse assemblage appearing in the Ediacaran, including the carbonaceous Sabellidites, and the mineralised Cloudina. Rod-like and filamentous tubular microfossils also become abundant in the Ediacaran, although these can be hard to classify due to the wide range of preservation methods, including compressions, casts, molds, and replacement fossils in silica and phosphatic materials.

Interpreting such simple fossils is difficult, and suggestions for their origin have included Bacterial colonies, filamentous Algae, and early Animals, possibly related to Annelids or Cnidarians.

A number of nonbranching and helically coiled tubular microfossils from the Portfjeld Formation have previously been described under the name Jiangispirellus groenlandicus, with has annulations, and Spirellus, which lacks annulations and has an enclosing, often calcified sheath, both of which have been interpreted as Cyanobacteria.

In a paper published in the Journal of Paleontology on 2 June 2022, Sebastian Willman and John Peel of the Department of Earth Sciences at Uppsala University, describe a new tubular microfossil from the Portfjeld Formation of North Greenland.

The description is based upon material collected by John Peel and Peter Frykman in July 1978, from an outcrop of the Portfjeld Formation on the north side of Wandel Dal, west of Øvre Midsommersø, the western of the two lakes comprising the Midsommersøer.

Simplified geological map and lithostratigraphic column of the Portfjeld Formation. (1) Geological map showing the sampling site at the western end of Midsommersøer in North Greenland; (2) lithostratigraphic column through the Portfjeld Formation at eastern Midsommersøer where the fossiliferous horizon is located at a lower level than in the fossil locality at western Midsommersøer. Willman & Peel (2022).

The microfossil is named Portfjeldia aestatis, where 'Portfjeldia' is a reference to the Portfjeld Formation, and 'aestatis' means summer, a reference to the location where it was found (Midsommersøer means 'Midsummer-lakes'). Portfjeldia aestatis is a cresent-shaped annulated tubular fossil with two or three slender, slowly expanding, internal tubules. The annulations on the external surface do not appear to correspond to any form of internal segmentation. The tube is not circular in cross section, and has longitudinal groves where it it adpressed against the internal tubules, probably implying that it was flexible in life. The internal tubules run parallel to one-another along the entire length of the preserved outer tubes. The best preserved section of tube, designated as the holotype, is about 400 μm in length, and about 45 μm wide, with the inner tubules being about 20 μm wide with an internal cavity about 10 μm wide.

Holotype of Portfjeldia aestatis and other unnamed tubular fossils showing various types of similar internal structures: (1)–(5) Portfjeldia aestatis (PMU 36870/2) from various viewpoints displaying two tubules interpreted as being originally enclosed by a now partly degraded external sheath; (3) enlargement of lower left of (4) with lines indicating three tubes rather than two, indicating a possible triradial symmetry; arrows in (2) and (4) show possible branching and development of daughter tube; (5) possible third tubule originating as a ridge near the other extremity. (6) Broken tube (PMU 39237/1), possibly related to the problematic spiral tube also described; arrow indicates internal groove also visible in (4). (7) Broken tube (PMU 38168/2) showing three possible tubules indicating a triradial structure (white lines). (8) Single whorl of a degraded, annulated helix with internal tubular structure (arrow) (PMU 36876/4). Scale bar 100 μm for (1), (2), (6)–(8) and 50 μm for (3)–(5). Willman & Peel (2022).

Willman and Peel also describe another distinctive tubular microfossil, but decline to name this as only a single specimen is known, and this was found within the helical coil of a specimen of Jiangispirellus groenlandicus, making it impossible to say there is not a relationship between the two. This specimen is almost 2 mm in length, with a diameter of about 20 μm, and a central opening running along its length about 10 μm in diameter.

Problematic helically spiraled tubular organism. (1), (2) Preserved as an internal tube inside an outer Jiangispirellus 'trichome', showing traces of cell wall (PMU 36870/3); (3) remains of a possible branching organism (arrow) within a 'trichome' (PMU 36868/4); (4) preserved 'trichome' of Jiangispirellus groenlandicus with internal secondary phosphatisation (PMU36874/5). Note that no internal septa are preserved, indicating that the phosphatised 'trichome' covered a hollow chamber. Scale bar 100 μm for (1), (3), (4) and 50 μm for (2). Willman & Peel (2022).

Ediacaran deposits have produced a wide range of tubular fossils of varying sizes, and debatable origins. The majority of the larger tubes are likely to have been produced by Metazoans (Animals), and some may have been biomineralised. As such, understanding these tubes is thought to be a key step to understanding the origin of the Animals as a whole. Many of these macroscopic fossils share morphological similarities to the microfossils Willmand and Peel describe from the Portfjeld Formation, being slightly-curved to sinuous, and occasionally branching. However, the macro- and microfossils are not identical in morphology, which, combined with the size difference between the two groups, makes it impossible to say if they are genuinely related or just show convergent morphology.

Microscopic tubular and filamentous fossils have variously been interpreted as Cyanobacteria, Algae, and Fungi. It is seldom even possible to say with any confidence whether these tubes were made by prokaryotic or eukaryotic organisms, due to the overlap in size between the two groups, although a number of 'grades' of structure have been proposed to try to separate different groups of tube-makers.

Tubes of sizes similar to the ones Willman and Peel describe from the Portfjeld Formation are known to be made by extant Cyanobacteria, such as Microcoleus, and Schizothrix, as well as sulphur-oxidizing Bacteria such as Thioploca. Forms such as the extant Trichodesmium even form bundles of filaments, as seen in Portfjeldia aestatis, and Subtifloria, an Ediacaran-Cambrian calcarious fossil comprising bundles of filaments, also interpreted as a Cyanobacteria. However, such bundles of filaments are not usually contained within an outer sheaf, and it is difficult to imagine what the advantage of such a sheaf would be to a photosynthetic Cyanobacterium.

Subtifloria is known from the Late Eidacaran deposits of Shaanxi Province, China, where it forms part of an assemblage that also includes forms interpreted as Oscillatorialean and Rivulariacean Cyanobacteria, some of the most complex members of the group today. The Shaanxi and Portfjeld Ediacaran biotas both contain Obruchevella, a helical microfossil possibly also made by a Cyanobacterium, as well as Jiangispirellus and Spirellus, suggesting a possible link between the two sites. 

Complex modern Cyanobacteria, such as those of the Order Nostocales, develop distinctive resting cells towards the end of their annual growth cycle, which can produce new filaments when conditions improve again, building up Cyanobacterial mats over time. The specimens from Portfjeld appear to be of a much more complicated nature than anything seen in such Cyanobacteria, and may well themselves be part of a larger and mote complex organism, making it unlikely the fossils are of Cyanobacterial origin.

The organism found preserved within the coil of a specimen of Jiangispirellus groenlandicus could be interpreted as a specimen of that organism, but for the presence of an internal cavity. Again, its general morphology is consistent with a Cyanobacterial origin, but its position within the coil of another calcified organism seems unlikely for anything which was reliant on photosynthesis to survive.

Eukaryotic Algae are important members of many modern ecosystems, both aquatic and terrestrial, and come in a wide range of forms. Neoproterozoic Algae can usually be identified either by a branching structure or the presence of more than one type of cell. The earliest form of multicellular Eukaryotic Algae, filamentous Red Algae, probably appeared at around the beginning of the Mesoproterozoic (1600 million years ago), while the first filamentous Green Algae probably appeared at around the beginning of the Neoproterozoic, about 1000 million years ago. The general shape and size of  Portfjeldia aestatis, this appears quite likely to be an Algae, although the internal tubules are unlike anything known from any Algal group, living or fossil.

Ediacaran deposits contain a wide variety of macrofossils which may-or-may-not represent early Animals. However some, such as the bilaterally symetrical Kimberella, are now generally accepted as being true Animals, in addition to which trace fossils have been found at a number of Ediacaran sites, leading to the possibility that fossils from Ediacaran deposits may represent Animals or parts of Animals. 

Mineralised tubular fossils are also common in the Ediacaran, and an Animal origin has been suggested for many of these, such as the Anabaritids, globally distributed tubular organisms that grew by accretion around the aperture and showed a triradial symmetry, which have been suggested as possible stem-group Cnidarians.

Another possibility is that the inner tubules of Portfjeldia aestatis are not part of the same organism as the outer tubes, but some form of cavity dwelling micro-organism which has secondarily occupied the tubes. Such behaviour is found in a variety of different organisms, including Bacteria, Algae, and Fungi. Such organisms will often occupy tubes created by other organisms, although the filamentous shape of Portfjeldia aestatis is unlike any known such organism, which tend to be more mesh-like in organisation, on which basis Willman and Peel consider this to be an unlikely scenario.

Given the possible alternatives, Willman and Peel believe that the most likely explanation is that Portfjeldia aestatis is some form of Algae, albeit one unlike any modern form. 

See also...

Online courses in Palaeontology

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.


Thursday, 17 March 2022

Dating the Hiawatha Impact Structure.

The Hiawatha Impact Structure is an approximately 31 km wide geomorphological structure beneath the Hiawatha Glacier in northwestern Greenland, which has been interpreted as an impact structure on the basis of the structure revealed by airborne radar surveys (a relatively flat, circular depression with an elevated rim and a subtle central uplift), structures in the bedrock along the ice margin, which strike tangentially to the subglacial rim, and the presence of shocked quartz and other impact-related grains in glaciofluvial sediments derived from the largest river draining the structure.

Dating this structure has proved to be difficult. It lies on the surface of the highly metamorphosed 1.95– to 1.75–billion-year-old Ellesmere-Inglefield Mobile Belt, and overlain by the Hiawatha Glacier, which is part of the 2.6 million-year-old Greenland Ice Shelf. This gives a maximum possible age of 1.75 billion years, but, due to the constantly moving nature of the glacier, no minimum age. Impact structures have a fairly constant width-to-depth ratio, so it can be predicted that when it formed the 31 km wide Hiawatha Structure would have had a depth of about 800 m when newly formed. Today it has a depth of about 320 m, implying a loss of about 480 m via erosion since the structure first formed. Estimates of the rate of erosion in subglacial environments vary between 10 m and 10 km per million years, giving the Hiawatha Structure an age of somewhere between 50 thousand and 50 million years. It has also been suggested that the anomalous radiostratigraphy of the ice of Hiawatha Glacier compared to the rest of the Greenland Ice Sheet may be a sign that the impact occurred after the formation of the glacier, making it less than 2.6 million years old.

In a paper published in the journal Science Advances on 9 March 2022, a team of scientists led by Gavin Kenny of the Department of Geosciences at the Swedish Museum of Natural History, William Hyde of the Globe Institute at the University of Copenhagen, Michael Storey of the Quadlab at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, and Adam Garde of the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, present the results of a study which aimed to find a date for the Hiawatha Impact using argon-argon dating of impact-related glaciofluvial sands and uranium-lead analysis of shocked zircons from glaciofluvial clasts of impact melt rock.

Argon-argon dating relies on determining the ratio of radioactive argon⁴⁰ to non-radioactive argon³⁹ within minerals from igneous or metamorphic rock (in this case impact melts) to determine how long ago the mineral cooled sufficiently to crystallise. The ratio of argon⁴⁰ to argon³⁹ is constant in the atmosphere, and this ratio will be preserved in a mineral at the time of crystallisation. No further argon³⁹ will enter the mineral from this point, but argon⁴⁰ is produced by the decay of radioactive potassium⁴⁰, and increases in the mineral at a steady rate, providing a clock which can be used to date the mineral.

Zircons are minerals formed by the crystallisation of cooling igneous (or in this case, impact) melts. When they form, they often contain trace amounts of uranium, which decays into (amongst other things) lead at a known rate. Since lead will not have been present in the original crystal, it is possible to calculate the age of a zircon crystal from the ratio between these elements.

Kenny et al. used a sample of well-sorted, fine-grained sand (HW21-2016) collected from a floodplain about 300 m from the terminus of the Hiawatha Glacier, and about 5 km from the Hiawatha Structure. Examination of satellite and aerial images shows that the section of floodplain material from which the sample was collected did not begin to build up until 2010, making Kenny et al. confident that it does contain material which has been washed along current sub-glacial waterways, and therefore does originate from the Hiawatha Structure.

 
Location and geomorphological setting of Hiawatha Glacier, northwest Greenland. (A) Regional view of northwest Greenland. (B) Bedrock topography mapshowing the Hiawatha structure, and sampling locations of glaciofluvial sediment for argon⁴⁰/argon³⁹ analysis (HW21-2016) and clasts of impact melt rock for zircon uranium/lead analysis (HW19-01 and HW19-05). Bed topography based on NASA and Alfred Wegener Institute airborne radar-sounding data. Samples HW19-01 and HW19-05 are from the same location on a wide riverbank 4 km downstream of the terminus of Hiawatha Glacier. White line represents the present-day margin of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Kenny et al. (2022).

In addition to the sand samples, Kenny et al. selected on two pebble-sized clasts (HW19-01 and HW19-05) obtained from a wide riverbank roughly 4 km downstream from the terminus of Hiawatha Glacier and less than 10 km from the edge of the Hiawatha structure. Both are clast-rich impact melt rocks with a dark grey, aphanitic, hemicrystalline melt matrix dominated by lath-like plagioclase feldspar microlites, that are thought likely to have reached the location where they were found via subglacial and glaciofluvial transport. Portions of both these pebbles were crushed an zircons extracted for analysis.

 
Images of impact melt rocks from the Hiawatha structure. (A) Feldspathic microlitic matrix with clasts of toasted quartz (qtz) and checkerboard feldspars (fsp). (B) Lightly toasted quartz fragment with two sets of PDFs that are considered unequivocal evidence of shock metamorphism. (C) Checkerboard feldspar. (D) Petrographic context of a granular and porous zircon (zr) grain in the feldspathic (fsp) matrix of impact melt rock, with accessory biotite (bt), ilmenite (ilm), and altered cordierite (crd). In contrast to zircon grains like this one that were in direct contact with the impact melt, zircon grains within clasts in impact melt rock do not display porous and granular textures. BSE, backscattered electrons; PPL, plane-polarized light; XPL, cross-polarized light. Kenny et al. (2022).

The sand grains extracted from the floodplain close to the glacier edge were examined visually to look for signs of impact melting. Four types of grains were identified within the sample. The first, and most abundant group, making up 40% of the sample, have a greenish gray, yellow, or dark organic-rich matrix with feldspathic microspherulites about 10 to 50 μm across and fragments of quartz and feldspar. The second most abundant grain type, making up 20% of the sample, have a non-crystalline, glassy, or commonly schlieric matrix and mineral fragments. The third most abundant grain type, making up 12% of the sample have a hemicrystalline, presumably feldspathic matrix and numerous mineral fragments. Finally, 6% of the grains have a dark, hemicrystalline, presumably feldspathic matrix and microlites presumably of pyroxene and ilmenite. Another 20% of the sample have overlapping features between these groups or are dark without distinct features. Also included in the study was a grain of pale, ellipsoidal to spherical silica ooids with nuclei of quartz fragments.

Stepwise argon⁴⁰/argon³⁹ analysis of these sand grains produced a range of readings, which is consistent with minerals from older episodes of melting being included within an impact melt, with 29 of the samples producing more than one age (consistent with partial melting and recrystallization of a mineral grain), of which 23 produced a younger age of 58.5 million years. Since no younger age was produced by any grain within the sample, Kenny et al. take this as the most probable age of the impact melt, making the impact a Late (but not Terminal) Palaeocene event. 

Fifteen unshocked zircons were selected from the two pebble-sized clasts, and subjected to uranium/lead analysis, most of which produced ages clustering around 1915 million years old, with the youngest being about 1485 million years old and the oldest about 2300 million years old. This is consistent with the age of intrusive felsic rocks in the area, supporting the hypothesis that the melts are of local origin. The altered zircons within the sample provided a range of ages between 1915 and 57.99 million years old, with the majority clustered at the minimum end of this range.

Unshocked zircons from the two pebble clasts collected about 10 km downstream of the Hiawatha Glacier give uranium/lead ages consistent with those of intrusive felsic rocks which outcrop at a number of sites around the crater, and which are therefore likely also to outcrop beneath it. Shocked zircons from the same material produce uranium/lead ages of about 58 million years. Argon⁴⁰/argon³⁹ analysis of sand particles from closer to the glacier yield a similar age. All of these samples appear to have been washed out from beneath the Hiawatha Glacier by a river which cuts through the rim of the Hiawatha Impact Structure. The simplest explanation for this is that the impact which caused this structure occurred in the Late Palaeocene. 

When the Hiawatha Impact Structure was first discovered it was thought likely to be less than 2.6 million years old; i.e. younger than the ice sheet which covers it. It has even been proposed that it might be as young as 12 900 years old, linking the impact to the onset of the Younger Dryas glacial episode. Kenny et al.'s findings suggest that the impact structure is much older than this, long predating glacier formation in Greenland.

Modelling of the original shape of the Hiawatha Impact Structure suggests that it has suffered about 500 m of vertical erosion since it was formed 58 million years ago, a much lower rate of erosion than has been predicted for subglacial features. This potentially has profound implications for the interpretation of other features beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet, although Kenny et al. are cautious of placing to much emphasis on this result without drill-core data to confirm the current interpretation of the structure of the feature. However, if this is correct then it means that a number of other features beneath the ice sheet are likely to be much older than previously thought, including a substantial river system currently thought to be subglacial in origin, but which might instead represent a long-standing morphological feature.

 
Geological map of Inglefield Land and Prudhoe Land, northwest Greenland. Previously published zircon uranium/lead ages for bedrock samples are shown in black text, and the age of unshocked zircon in clasts of impact melt rock sampled 4 km downstream from the terminus of Hiawatha Glacier (present study) is shown in green text. The dominant age of unshocked zircon in the impact melt rock samples (1915 ± 8 million years) is indistinguishable from the zircon uranium/lead ages of three felsic igneous intrusions in the vicinity of Hiawatha Glacier (bold text), supporting a local origin for the clasts of impact melt rock. Kenny et al. (2022).

Numerous pebble-sized charcoal fragments, many with cellular structures indicative of Conifer wood, have been found in the outwash of the Hiawatha Glacier. These have previously been taken as evidence of an Early Pleistocene forest system in Greenland, but the new date for the Hiawatha Impact Crater suggests that, if these are related to the impact event, then they must also be Palaeocene in origin. This actually fits well with our understanding of the Palaeocene Arctic, with Conifer fossils known from several Arctic sites.

The anomalous radiostratigraphy of the ice of Hiawatha Glacier compared to the rest of the Greenland Ice Sheet has been invoked as evidence for a young age for the impact structure beneath the glacier. If the glacier is in fact much younger than the impact structure, then an alternative explanation for the radiostratigraphy is needed. Kenny et al. suggest that this might have been caused by water flowing into the crater beneath the ice sheet and then building up until it escaped catastrophically. Alternatively, a collapse of the Nares Strait Ice Bridge in the Early Pleistocene could have disrupted ice structures in northwest Greenland.

The boundary between the Palaeocene and the Eocene, 55.93 million years ago, is marked by a global carbon isotope excursion, and the onset of a period of rapid warming that led to the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. This is close to the age of the Hiawatha Impact Structure, but not identical, and is better explained by massive flood basalt volcanism associated with the opening of the northeast Atlantic about 56 million years ago. There was also a significant lava flow outburst in Greenland in the Palaeocene, but this has been dated to 62 million years ago, older than the Hiawatha Impact Structure, and therefore unrelated to it. A number of spherule beds have of Palaeocene age have previously been discovered in western Greenland and on the northeastern coast of the United States, but these are now thought to be of volcanic origin, rather than impact related.

However, the Marquez Impact Structure in Texas has been dated to 58.3 million years ago, which is a very close match with the Hiawatha Impact Structure, suggesting that a link between the two is quite possible. The coincident age of two large impact structures may imply that other impacts happened at the same time, and that evidence of these is either undiscovered or has been lost. The timing of the Hiawatha and Marquez impacts does coincide with the end of the Late Palaeocene Carbon Isotope Maximum, a sudden increase in the proportion of carbon¹³ and a concurrent episode of global cooling, which ended abruptly at about 58 million years ago, when carbon¹³ levels dropped sharply and the Earth began a long-term warming trend. The absence of a distinct ejecta layer associated with the Hiawatha Impact makes it impossible to date this event with sufficient precision to link it to this shift, but Kenny et al. do note that the shift in carbon isotope ratios was far more sudden than is usually observed. The Chicxulub Impact has been linked to a major shift in carbon isotope ratios, but this, much larger, event is also known to have caused major disruption to the biosphere, which is generally assumed to be the cause of the carbon isotope shift. No known shift in the biosphere has been recorded which can be associated with the Hiawatha Impact, and no impact other than the Chicxulub event is known to have had any measurable influence on the Earth's biosphere, but this does not rule out the possibility that an impact such as the Hiawatha event could have caused changes to the biosphere which have not been recorded.

See also...














Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.

 

Friday, 19 February 2021

The Portfjeld Biota: A Doushantuo-type Lagerstätte from the Ediacaran of southern Peary Land, North Greenland.

Remarkably detailed preservation of cells and soft tissues has been described from several Precambrian Lagerstätten, providing some of the best documented examples of early organismal evolution. Typically, this quality of preservation is made possible through several pathways, of which diagenetic phosphate replacement of originally organic material ('Doushantuo-type preservation') has provided some of the most spectacular descriptions of putative Animal embryos, Acritarchs, and small shelly fossils across the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary. Following their discovery and rise to fame in the late 1990s, the fossils from the well-known Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation of China have sparked controversy and debate, especially regarding speculative interpretation as fossil Animal embryos. However, in contrast to the widespread localities yielding macroscopic assemblages, sites yielding Doushantuo-type microscopic assemblages, which could help to resolve some of the most fundamental questions on the evolution of life and clarify the distribution of these organisms in the Ediacaran world, have proved elusive.

In a paper published in the journal Communications Biology on 6 November 2020, Sebastian Willman and John Peel of the Department of Earth Sciences (Palaeobiology) at Uppsala University, Jon Ineson and Niels Schovsbo of the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, and Elias Rugen and Robert Frei of the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resources Management at the University of Copenhagen, present the first record of Ediacaran Doushantuo-type microfossils from Laurentia (Portfjeld Formation, North Greenland). The Portfjeld biota consists of three-dimensionally preserved putative eggs and embryos, as well as Acanthomorphic and Leiosphaeric Acritarchs, Red Algal thalli, Sheet-like and Oscillatoriacean Cyanobacteria, and Miicrobial mat fragments. The assemblage is directly comparable to similarly preserved fossils from the Doushantuo Formation but its significance at this time lies in greatly expanding the known record of Ediacaran phosphatised microfossils geographically, from the northern hemisphere of the Ediacaran world into the middle latitudes of its southern hemisphere. In addition, the preservation of the Portfjeld Biota in a shallow water setting greatly increases our insight into the environments where life evolved during the Ediacaran.

The Portfjeld Formation is the lowermost formation of the Franklinian Basin in southern Peary Land, resting unconformably on Mesoproterozoic sandstones of the Independence Fjord Group and localized erosionally truncated outliers of Neoproterozoic tillites and associated carbonates of inferred Marinoan affinity. The carbonate-dominated Portfjeld Formation is overlain, at a karstified unconformity, by transgressive fluvial to marine shelf siliciclastics of the Buen Formation. The sandstone-dominated lower member of the Buen Formation yields trace fossils of early Cambrian age, while the mudstone-dominated upper member contains rich faunas of Cambrian Series 2 (Stage 3–4) age.

 
Field photographs of locality of the Portfjeld biota. (a) Portfjeld Formation-basal Buen sandstones at Midsommersøer, notice the conspicuous band of dark cherty dolomites. (b) Detail of Portfjeld Formation, west of Midsommersøer, with the same darky cherty dolomites overlain by thrombolitic mounds, showing the lithostratigraphic horizon yielding the Portfjeld biota. (c) View looking east along Wandel Dal with Midsommersøer, taken from the fossil locality (off shot left). Scale bar valid for (a). Willman et al. (2020).

The Portfjeld Formation comprises two discrete stratigraphic packages separated by a regionally developed karstic unconformity. The lower succession, about 170 m thick, is dominated by dolostones with rare limestones and represents two transgressive–regressive cycles of a carbonate ramp. Typical facies include hummocky cross-stratified intraclast-rich grainstones and cherty dark dolostones of the mid- and outer ramp, and ooid–pisoid grainstones and varied microbial facies of the inner ramp, including columnar and meter-scale domal Stromatolites and thrombolitic bioherms. The capping hiatal surface shows penetrative and multi-generational karstic features extending some 40m beneath the surface, including extensive interstratal solution, brecciation, and successive cave/ vug/fracture fills and cementation, testifying to a protracted period of subaerial exposure. The transgressive succession of the upper Portfjeld Formation (roughly 70–90m thick) comprises fluvial sandstones and mudstones succeeded by high-energy shallow marine carbonate and siliciclastic facies, truncated upwards by dolines and karstic collapse structures at the Portfjeld–Buen formation boundary.

 
Geography, geology, and stratigraphy of the study area, North Greenland. (a) Geological map showing the sample locality at Midsommersøer, North Greenland. (b) Stratigraphic schemes in northern Ellesmere Island and North Greenland. (c) Stratigraphic section through the Portfjeld Formation at the western end of Midsommersøer compared with relative proportions of carbon¹³ (in parts per thousand, relative to the Vienna-Pee Dee Belemnite standard) values indicating the Shuram–Wonoka anomaly (about 570–560 million years ago), 'F' indicates the sample locality. Willman et al. (2020).

Chemostratigraphy shows that the relative proportions of carbon¹³ of the Portfjeld Formation carbonate samples range from +4‰ to −8‰ (relative to the Vienna-Pee Dee Belemnite standard). Positive relative proportions of carbon¹³ values persist over the lower approximately 40 m of the formation, before a marked negative shift of 12‰ down to values of −8‰. A more gradual increase characterises the relative proportions of carbon¹³ values up-section through the karstified strata to the karstic unconformity at 167 m, following which there is a clear stabilization in relative proportions of carbon¹³ values to values around 0 to −1‰ for the remainder of the succession.

The relative proportions of carbon¹³ database for Neoproterozoic carbonate sections has proliferated within the last 30 years to the point where a relative proportions of carbon¹³ compilation curve can act as a chemostratigraphic correlation tool for newly studied sections. Utilising chemostratigraphy as a chronology tool involves the correlation of globally coherent geochemical perturbations and trends in vertical carbonate successions, within a broadly understood timeframe. This is particularly useful when attempting to refine age estimates for successions that lack abundant biostratigraphical and/or radiometric data. Utilising the most up-to-date relative proportions of carbon¹³ chemostratigraphic framework, the asymmetric negative relative proportions of carbon¹³ excursion and more gradual recovery displayed by the midsection of the Portfjeld Formation can be aligned with the most extreme carbon-isotope variation recorded in Earth’s history: the Shuram–Wonoka anomaly. The form and magnitude (roughly 12‰) of this relative proportions of carbon¹³ excursion, as well as a nadir value of −8‰, are unique to the Shuram–Wonoka anomaly and deter its alignment with other Neoproterozoic excursions, as well as the Basal Cambrian Isotope Excursion.

The Shuram–Wonoka anomaly is recognized intercontinentally in Late Ediacaran strata and provides a broad chronostratigraphic marker to constrain the biostratigraphy presented in Willman et al.'s study. George Williams and Philip Schmidt noted that the Wonoka excursion spanned an interval of up to 10 million years. from about 570 to 560 million years ago and was recognized in shallow marine shelf environments on three palaeocontinents with low palaeolatitudes (less than 32°), whereas the North Greenland record reported by Willman et al. is from middle palaeolatitudes.

Well-preserved, phosphatised spiral Oscillatoriacean cCyanobacteria were recovered from strata in southern Peary Land and previously described by John Peel. That study also noted the presence of smooth, wrinkled, or crumpled spheres resembling Olivooides, which prompted Willman et al.'s new investigation. Consequently, Willman et al. processed new fractions of the Stromatolitic dolostone sample from the Portfjeld Formation. Willman et al. now report some of the main findings within a diverse assemblage of microfossils that is comparable to the long-studied and highly important Doushantuo Formation biota of China.

Undisputed Animal embryos were first identified from the Cambrian of China through the description of a series of developmental stages in Olivooides and Markuelia. Despite being simple in morphology there is good evidence from developmental series showing that at least some Olivooides develop into Cnidarians but the simple spherical morphology of these earliest growth stages also permits other interpretations (e.g. Echinoderms). Markuelia is usually considered to be a Scalidophoran. Similarly, proposed Animal cleavage embryos have been reported also from the older Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation, but their interpretation is contested with several hypotheses concerning their affinity still current. The putative eggs and embryos described by Willman et al. are directly comparable in morphology and age to those from the Doushantuo Formation. 

Biologically, the transition from egg to embryo comes at fertilisation, after which the egg enters the reproductive stage. In fossil material this distinction is normally seen as a ball of cells, where the number of cells doubles during each division. Spheroidal microfossils with smooth envelopes recovered from Portfjeld Formation are interpreted as putative eggs. The embryo-like fossils from the Portfjeld biota consists of clusters (150–170 μm in diameter) of hundreds of individual cells, normally 15–20 μm in diameter, but many are smaller (5–10 μm in diameter). The cells are tightly packed and seem to extend inwards. Neighboring cells appear to accommodate each other, indicating that they are not rigid Algal clusters. Most cells are complete but show evidence of deflation or, where broken, display internal phosphatised contents. One specimen is interpreted as late stage 'Megaclonophycus-stage'. Two others are similar to cleavage embryos (256-cell or similar) reported from the Cambrian Kuanchuanpu Formation in China but comparisons can also be made with Wengania globosa and Wengania exquisita from the Ediacaran Weng’an biota. A morphological furrow may be present. A peanut-shaped specimen can be compared with the germinating stage in Tianzhushania, although this simple morphology is not sufficient in itself to make such a definite link. Taxonomic details have been examined in various contexts with regards to suites of developmental stages (for example referring all developmental stages including Megasphaera, Parapandorina, Megaclonophycus, and Yintianzhushania to Tianzhushania) and Willman et al. refrain from commenting further on this. Many vesicles are hollow and show evidence of flexible deformation during deflation prior to phosphatisation. Others, which are more delicate, break during mounting to reveal the originally organic internal contents. Many other smooth vesicles show evidence for pre-determined rupture. Simple, lobose, pseudoparenchymatous thalli resembling Florideophyte Red Algae (Gremiphyca corymbiata) are also present in the Portfjeld biota.

 
Putative eggs, embryos, and Red Algae from the Portfjeld Formation. (a)–(f) Putative cleavage embryos. (b), (d), (f) Enlarged to show the detail of polygonal cell junctions. (g) Red Algal thalli similar to Gremiphyca corymbiata. h–m Putative eggs showing various degrees of taphonomic degradation (h), (k) ductile; (j), (m) brittle. (i) Shows a possible peanut-shaped cell division. (j), (m) Showing breakage of vesicle wall, the shape of the breakage, its size and location on the specimen is similar in many specimens and may therefore be interpreted as a biological feature rather than random breakage. (n) Shows a comparably large unidentified Acritarch showing polygonal shrinkage and a golf ball-like vesicle surface structure. Scale bar 100 μm, unless where individually stated. Accession numbers; (a), (b) PMU 36863/1. (c), (d) PMU 36864/1. (e), (f) PMU 36865/1. (f) PMU 36865/1. (g) PMU 36866/1. (h) PMU 36867/1. (i) PMU 36868/1. (j) PMU 36869/1. (k) PMU 36869/2. (l) PMU 36870/1. (m) PMU 36869/3. (n) PMU 36864/2. Willman et al. (2020).

In addition to fossils previously interpreted as eggs and embryos, Acanthomorphic Acritarchs are rare but well-preserved and important constituents of the Portfjeld biota. Cavaspina acuminata is a spheroidal vesicle about 160 μm in diameter with solid and widely separated processes tapering to a conical tip that seems to curve. About 40 processes, many of which are broken, are visible on the vesicle surface (unbroken processes about 15 μm long, which is 10% of vesicle diameter, width at base 5 μm). The originally spheroidal (long axis about 185 μm) Asterocapsoides wenganensis is characterised by its short, hollow, homomorphic, evenly distributed, conical processes that taper to a sub-rounded tip (processes are 15–20 μm long, 10–15 μm at base and 5 μm at the tip, and spaced 5 μm apart). Similar Acanthomorphic Acritarchs (e.g. Mengeosphaera with biform processes, or Meghystrichosphaeridium, with pentagonal or hexagonal fields around the processes) are described from Doushantuo, displaying a taphonomic and taxonomic connection between the Portfjeld and the Doushantuo biota. Spheroidal vesicles, slightly compressed at the poles (diameter 160–180 and 210–300 μm, individual whorls about 50–60 μm in thickness), consisting of three, anti-clockwise coiling whorls, with a rounded termination are rare but well-preserved, and indicative of early biological chirality. Similar fossils, although larger and with clockwise coiling, were described as the later-stage part of a developmental series.

 
Acanthomorphic Acritarchs, helically coiled spheroids, Microbial mat fragment. (a), (b) Cavaspina acuminata, showing nature of sparsely separated, tapering processes. (c), (d) Asterocapsoides wenganensis showing densely arranged, conical processes. Box in (d) shows the conical shape of mostly unbroken processes. (e), (f) Helically anti-clockwise coiling, spheroidal microfossils with closed termination. (g) Putative egg shell broken during preparation displaying internal contents (indicated by arrow). (h) Microbial mat displaying community structures with intertwined filamentous structures. (i), (j) Coiled Cyanobacterium Jiangispirellus groenlandicus and close up of individual cell walls. (k) Spirellus shankari Cyanobacterium showing the nature of the coiling helix. Scale bar 100 μm, unless where individually stated. Accession numbers; (a), (b) PMU 36871/1. (c), (d) PMU 36872/1. (e) PMU 36866/2. (f) PMU 36866/3. (g) PMU36872/2. h PMU 36873/1. (i), (j) PMU 36873/2. (k) PMU 36874/1. Willman et al. (2020).

Helically coiled filamentous microfossils are very common remains in the Portfjeld biota; they are also well represented in the Khesen Group of Mongolia, but rare in the Doushantuo Formation. Three main types, Obruchevella, Spirellus, and Jiangispirellus, all interpreted as Oscillatoriacean Cyanobacteria, were initially described. Jiangispirellus groenlandicus consists of an open-coiled trichome with delicately preserved cell structure. Spirellus shankari consists of a helix without evidence of cell structure and is interpreted as a filament that is often calcified (now phosphatised). The different types of Cyanobacteria show a range in differential taphonomic preservation representing degrees of degradation and mineralisation of the original form.

John Peel previously considered the Oscillatoriacean Cyanobacteria within the Portfjeld Biota to be consistent with an early Cambrian age following geological correlation with the Ella Bay Formation of easternmost Ellesmere Island (Nunavut, Canada), where samples with early Cambrian macrofossils were known at a lower stratigraphic level. However, the fossils reported by Darrel Long from below the Ella Bay Formation, the direct lithological correlative of the Portfjeld Formation along the northern coast of Greenland, were subsequently demonstrated to have been tectonically emplaced from overlying strata of the Cambrian Ellesmere Group. In consequence, prior to the present discoveries, biostratigraphic control of the age of the Ella Bay and Portfjeld formations was restricted to early Cambrian fossils and trace fossils occurring above the formations in Ellesmere Island and North Greenland. A late Neoproterozoic age for the Portfjeld and Ella Bay formations was proposed tentatively by Keith Dewing, Christopher Harrison, Brian Pratt, and Ulrich Mayer on the basis of correlation with the Risky Formation of the Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada, and the Spiral Creek Formation of North-East Greenland. The age of the former is constrained by Ediacaran macrofossils, whereas the Spiral Creek Formation is a correlative of successions in eastern Svalbard yielding Neoproterozoic Acritarchs.

The relative proportions of carbon¹³ values in the uppermost carbonates of the Portfjeld Formation, above the karstic unconformity, are compatible with global early Cambrian values. This confirms the interpretation that the intra-Portfjeld unconformity represents a substantial depositional hiatus, supporting the view that the Portfjeld Formation spans the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary.

Simple multicellular organisms may have evolved already in the Mesoproterozoic, but it was in the Ediacaran that complex Eukaryotes first began to diversify. Until now, the Doushantuo Formation has been our main source of information on soft-bodied organisms predating the classical and enigmatic, macroscopic Ediacaran biota. As such, the discovery of the same type of fossils from North Greenland offers important additional evidence to understanding soft-bodied organismal evolution. The many spheroidal fossils discovered in the Portfjeld biota show a variety of morphologies consistent with interpretations that conform well with both blastula stage embryos and spiral stage embryos. The exact phylogenetic framework is complex; multicellularity, for example, evolved on many different occasions and independently in Animals, Fungi, and Algae. Modern Animal embryos or Volvocine Green Algae may provide analogs to Ediacaran embryos but these interpretations are nevertheless imperfect; it is unlikely that the fossils described by Willman et al. represent crown-group Animals. The Portfjeld Acritarchs form part of a globally distributed and diverse assemblage of morphologically complex and well-documented Acritarchs described from carbonaceous compressions in shales, from thin-sectioned cherts as well as phosphatised. As with the eggs and embryos, phylogenetic uncertainties must be resolved through study of available material from all assemblages.

 
Putative eggs and embryos at various stages of taphonomic degradation. (a) Putative cleavage embryo displaying individual cells. (b)–(s) Putative eggs/embryos in various states of degradation; internal contents are often preserved and seen as external enveloping layer is broken or peeled off (b)–(d), (g)–(i), (q) but absent when compressed (p); surface structures vary from golf ball-like (f), wrinkled (b), pitted (j) to smooth (h), and from thin-, (s) to thick-walled (g). Some specimens have surface structures that may represent grooves (arrow in (n)) or polar invaginations (arrows in (g)). (t) Probable tightly coiled Cyanobacterium. Scale bar 100 μm. Accession numbers; (a) PMU 36868/2. (b) PMU 36869/4. (c) PMU 36874/2. (d) PMU 36875/1. (e) PMU 36876/1. (f) PMU 36876/2. (g) PMU 36877/1. (h) PMU 36875/2. (i) PMU 36877/2. (j) PMU 36877/3. (k) PMU 36874/3. (l) PMU 36869/5. (m) PMU 36876/3. (n) PMU 36872/2. (o) PMU 36878/1. (p) PMU 36864/3. (q) PMU 36865/2. (r) PMU 36879/1. s PMU 36877/4. (t) PMU 36868/2. Willman et al. (2020).

The Portfjeld biota seems to preserve specimens that are generally smaller (roughly 100–200 μm) than their morphologically similar Doushantuo biota counterparts (roughly 400–500 μm or larger). There may be several reasons for this discrepancy but they all fall within the framework of natural variation. For the embryo-like fossils, ontogeny may play a role but more importantly the geographic distance between Portfjeld and Doushantuo and the differences in their environments of accumulation must also be taken into consideration.

Palaeogeographically, South China (including the Yangtze Block and the Doushantuo Formation) was probably drifting southwards from a low northerly latitude at the time of deposition of the Weng’an biota, usually suggested to be about 580 million years ago, although it could be as old as 609 ± 5 million years. Laurentia (including North Greenland and the Portfjeld Formation) is estimated to have lain at palaeolatitudes of 30–75° S, with Laurentia completely isolated from all other continents. Thus, Laurentia and South China were significantly separated from each other at the time of deposition of the two biotas, lying in different hemispheres. While the Weng’an biota yields the oldest putative Metazoans, the discovery of similar fossils from the Portfjeld Formation, half a world away, demonstrates that these early possible Animals had a worldwide distribution. The palaeogeographic separation is evident but not surprising given the global distribution of many other important Ediacaran fossils. It is therefore perhaps a question of propitious preservation rather than geographic constraints. The two biotas are seemingly older than most of the classic, enigmatic macrofossil biotas now known globally, with the potential exception of the Avalon biota (574–564 million years old). Furthermore, they occupied different environments with the Portfjeld biota deposited in an inner carbonate shelf environment, whereas the Weng’an biota accumulated on the outer shelf. The driving force behind this early evolution has often been attributed to ocean oxidation and fluctuations in the marine carbon and sulfur cycles, but the successful establishment of these early ecosystems may have been dependent on local environmental fluctuations. However, the discovery of the Portfjeld Biota indicates that this early evolution was not restricted locally to China, nor to outer shelf environments, but flourished in geographically separated areas, as was the case also with the younger macrobiota as well as the Acanthomorphic Acritarchs ranging throughout the Ediacaran. Thus, oxygenation was probably widespread at this time, providing new direct evidence about the early evolution of cellularly differentiated Eukaryotes and even the early evolution of Animals.

 
Stratigraphic and palaeogeographic distribution of evolutionary important Ediacaran assemblages. (a) Stratigraphic distribution of the Portfjeld biota and the Weng’an biota (representative of Doushantuo Formation), the latter of which predates the classical macroscopic 'Ediacaran biota' and probably also predating the Gaskiers glaciation. The potential stratigraphic range of the biotas is indicated by the vertical line but detailed stratigraphic correlation and relationships to other biotas remain to be resolved. (b) Palaeogeographic reconstruction at about 580 million years ago, black polygons show location of the two taphonomic windows of this type known from the Ediacaran and their spatial separation. Willman et al. (2020).

It is evident that the Portfjeld biota predates the nadir of the Shuram–Wonoka anomaly. However, there is no geochemical or lithostratigraphic evidence in the measured Portfjeld section to suggest that this succession encompasses the Gaskiers Glaciation (580 million years ago), indicating that Portfjeld biota, age wise, lies between the Shuram–Wonoka anomaly and the Gaskiers Glaciation and likely preserves a different evolutionary scenario. Published age estimates for the Weng’an biota range from abour 580 million years ago to 609 ± 5 million years ago and suggest that the Weng’an biota may be at least 10 million years or possibly as much as 40 million years older than the Portfjeld biota. Given the magnitude of the age difference, however uncertain, the degree of palaeogeographic separation of the localities and their contrasting environments, it is evident that the Portfjeld biota provides an additional window onto the early evolution of Ediacaran life, rather than a mere duplication of the Weng’an event.

The Portfjeld Formation crops out over hundreds of kilometers in North Greenland but is poorly known on account of its remoteness. The assemblage of extremely well-preserved microfossils presented by Willman et al., and its striking similarity to previously described fossils from the Doushantuo Formation of China, demonstrates greater complexity and worldwide distribution of the late Ediacaran ecosystem than previously recognized. The finds from North Greenland extend the known distribution of the Ediacaran Doushantuo-like biota along the length of the Pannotian palaeocontinent, from low to middle latitudes in the northern hemisphere (China) to the middle latitude position in the southern hemisphere occupied by North Greenland in eastern Laurentia; their age is confirmed by chemostratigraphy.

With a background in the largely unexplored potential represented by the Portfjeld Formation, the new discoveries offer excellent prospects for resolving the phylogenetic relationships of many of these problematic multicellular Ediacaran Eukaryotes and a better understanding of the environments in which they evolved.

See also...














Online courses in Palaeontology. 

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.