Showing posts with label UNESCO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNESCO. Show all posts

Tuesday, 28 July 2026

UNESCO adds three new sites to its World Heritage List.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) has added seven new sites to its World Heritage List, which is made up of sites deemed to be of natural or cultural significance which gives them outstanding universal significance for mankind, according to a press release issued on 26 July 2026. All three of these sites have additionally been placed on the World Heritage in Danger list of sites which are facing imminent threats due to Human or natural causes. In addition, three sites already on the World Heritage List have also been placed on the World Heritage in Danger list.

The first new site added to the World Heritage List is the Boma-Badingilo Migratory Landscape in South Sudan; this is the first site in South Sudan to be added to the World Heritage List. This area comprises two National Parks, Boma and Badingilo, which are contiguous with one another, currently managed by African Parks on behalf of the South Sudanese government. The parks lie in the White Nile catchment area, and are home to the world's largest Mammal migration, with over six million Antelope trasversing the area each year, as well as being an important part of the migrant Bird route between Southern Africa and Europe. The area is a biodiversity hotspot of global significance, as well as being home to a number of ethnic groups with their own unique cultural and linguistic heritage, who have acted as custodians of this landscape.

An Antelope migration in the Boma-Badingilo Migratory Landscape. African Parks.

The UNESCO World Heritage Committee has identified the Boma-Badingilo Migratory Landscape as facing a number of serious threats, including infrastructure development, commercial poaching, and wildlife trafficking and trade, while at the same time lacks meaningful protection from the South Sudanese government, which is under-financed and has a weak infrastructure, with the country suffering from a poor security situation. For these reasons the Boma-Badingilo Migratory Landscape has been placed on the World Heritage in Danger list.

Traditional herders within the Boma-Badingilo Migratory Landscape. African Parks.

The second new addition to the World Heritage List is the Mount Amel Castles sites in Lebanon. This site compromises a series of five castles across southern Lebanon, built during the Crusader Period on strategic high ground sites, and subsequently used by the Ayyubids, Mamluks, and later powers. These are Qalaat al-Chakif, or Beaufort Castle, dominating the Litani River valley from a strategic ridge, Qalaat Tibnin, or Toron Castle, on a mountain overlooking the road from Tyre to Damascus, Qalaat Chakra, or Dubieh Castle, in the Chakra agricultural region, Qalaat Deir Kifa, or Maron Castle, on an isolated hill overlooking the route from Lebanon towards Galilee and Jerusalem, and Qalaat Chama’, on a hill overlooking the coastal plain near Tyre.

Qalaat Tibnin, or Toron Castle, in 2006. T Dakroub/Wikimedia Commons.

In November 2024 the Mount Amel Castles were given 'enhanced protection status by the UNESCO Committee for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, a status which grants access to the Fund for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, as well helping to make applications for other forms of international assistance. However, since that time the sites have suffered heavy damage due to the ongoing conflict in the region, and are now considered to be in jeopardy of complete destruction, prompting the World Heritage Committee to move the sites to both the World Heritage List and the World Heritage in Danger list as a way to highlight the risk of losing these sites.

Qalaat al-Chakif, or Beaufort Castle. UNESCO.

The third new site added to the World Heritage List is the Palestinian village of Sebastia in the Nablus Governate of the State of Palestine. This is a site of significant archaeological heritage, having been inhabited since at least the ninth century BC, when it served as the capital of the northern Kingdom of Israel, and has since been occupied by Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Hellenistic Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, Crusaders, Ayyubids, Mamluks, and Ottomans. The village was the site of a fortified town associated with Herod the Great during the Roman period, and  was a Throne Village (administrative centre governed by local leaders) during the Ottoman period. It is considered to be the burial place of St John the Baptist.

A Roman theatre in the Palestinian village of Sebastia. Wikimedia Commons.

The site has been chosen for inclusion on the World Heritage List and the World Heritage in Danger list both because it is threatened by the ongoing conflict in the region, and also because it is threatened with expropriation, with half the site, including many privately owned propertied, earmarked to become part of the proposed Shomron National Park, a development which would allow access to the site only from Israel, excluding many Palestinians who have worked as traditional guides at the site. This project sits alongside plans for the expansion of Jewish settlements in the region, again almost certainly at the detriment of the local Palestinian population.

Roman ruins on the hilltop site near Sebastia. Jason Burke/The Guardian.

The first site already on the World Heritage List which is being additionally added to the World Heritage in Danger list is the Tauric Chersonese, an ancient city on the Crimean Peninsula founded by Ionian Greeks in the sixth century BC, and subsequently occupied by Megarian Greeks, the Pontic Empire, the Roman Empire, and the Byzantine Empire, before being abandoned in the fourteenth century. Although Crimea is part of Ukraine, it has been occupied by Russia since 2014, with no apparent plan for its protection, conservation, or management. The site is currently monitored remotely by UNITAR/UNOSAT, which has revealed significant degradation of the site, due to construction and large-scale excavation at the site. The World Heritage Committee believes there is a significant danger of the illicit trafficking of cultural property from the Crimea.

The ruins of Chersonesos, Crimea, in 2009. Dmitry Mottl/Wikimedia Commons.

The second site from the World Heritage List added to the World Heritage in Danger list is the Historic Inner City of Paramaribo in Suriname, a former Dutch colonial town from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries planted on the northern coast of tropical South America. At the moment, original and highly characteristic street plan of the historic centre remains intact, with buildings that illustrate the gradual fusion of Dutch architectural influence with traditional local techniques and materials. However, the World Heritage Committee feels that the new National Assembly hall and the Yogh parking garage detract from the property’s historic urban landscape and result in a significant loss of its authenticity and integrity, that constitute a threat to the site's outstanding universal value.

Houses in the Historic Inner City of Paramaribo in Suriname. Ron Van Oers/UNESCO.

The final site to be added to the World Heritage in Danger list is the city of Tyre in Lebanon. This site has been occupied since the Bronze Age, but rose to prominence as a major Phoenician city-state between ninth and sixth centuries BC, and was subsequently occupied by the Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Hellenic Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, Early Muslims, Crusaders, Mamluks, Ottomans, Egyptians, and French, prior to Lebanon gaining independence in 1943. As such, the city is home to numerous archaeological sites of great significance, with those of the Roman Period being particularly spectacular. 

Roman ruins at Tyre on the coast of Lebanon. Véronique Dauge/UNESCO.

Like the Mount Amel Castles, the city of Tyre is threatened by the ongoing conflict in southern Lebanon, and while the World Heritage Committee commends Lebanon for its efforts to protect Tyre, they also feel that the historic sites are now directly threatened by the conflict.

See also...

Saturday, 8 January 2022

Preserving the earthen architecture of Djenné, Mali.

The city of Djenné lies in the Niger Inland Delta of central Mali, and is thought to have been inhabited since about 250 BC, forming a part of the trans-Saharan trade network connecting West Africa to the Mediterranean. It is a UNESCO World Herritage Site, one of four in Mali, along with Timbuktu, the Tomb of Askia, and the Dogon communities living on the Cliff of Bandiagara. From the thirteenth century onwards Djenné became a major trading centre for commodities such as rice and corn, and a centre for arts, learning and religion. The city's most famous feature is the Great Mosque, which was built in 1220 AD, and substantially rebuilt in 1907. 

Declared in 1988, the Old Towns of Djenné World Herritage Site includes the city of Djenné, the Great Mosque, the archaeology of Djenné-Jeno and the surrounding old towns of Hambarketolo, Tonomba, and Kaniana. This has prompted a series of restoration projects in the city, funded by cultural agencies, non-profit organisations and foreign government aid organisations, and starting with the restoration of the Great Mosque in 2008. These projects have provoked debate about the role of conservation in Mali, and to what extent is serves the needs of local people or imposes external ideas on what aspects of the country's heritage should be preserved and how. 

In a paper published in the journal Built Heritage on 30 December 2021, Oussouby Sacko of the Graduate School of Architecture at Kyoto Seika University, discusses the relationship between cultural conservation and cultural heritage preservation, based upon observation of restoration projects in Djenné, made during field surveys carried out between 2010 and 2017. 

 
Map of the Republic of Mali. Sacko (2021).

The city of Djenné currently has a population of about 20 000 people, up from about 12 000 in1987, The majority of these speak Djenné Chiini, a local dialect of Songhay, but several other languages are spoken, including Bozo, Fulani, and Bambara. The city is arranged into several different quarters, each occupied by a different ethnic/professional group (people's professions tend to be closely linked to their ethnic background), with the Great Mosque and market square at the centre. Each of the ethnic groups living in the city tends to follow its own trade or trades, with the Bozo being  fishermen and builders, the Fulani cattle raisers, the Bambara specialising in farming, the Sarakolé being merchants, and the Songhai being Quran teachers, religious and traditional leaders. 

 
An areal view of the ciry if Djenné. Sacko (2021).

There are three dominant building styles found in Djenné, Moroccan, Tukulor and Plain, which differ principally in the arrangement of their fasçades. The three styles of building tend to reflect the both the history and socioeconomic standing of the house and its residents. Houses are typically two story, with a flat roof terrace, and allow for a separation of the sexes. Houses have a vestibule which connects the inner courtyard to the street, and which is typically used as both an entrance and a place of business. Thus, it can be used as a Qur’anic school space if the occupant is a marabout (religious teacher), a workshop for a craftsman, etc..

 
House Plan of Djenné. Sacko (2021).

The basic material used for construction in Djenné is banco, a mixture of mud and other ingredients, used both to make bricks and as a mortar and plaster covering. Bricks come in two forms, the traditional Djenné ferey, which are roughly cylindrical, and toubabou ferey (roughly 'foreign bricks'), which are rectangular bricks introduced in the 1930s, shaped like a traditional European brick. Banco is prepared in pits by the river during the dry season. This begins as a mixture of earth and rice husks, then has other ingredients added, such as Baobab fruit powder, shea butter, and gum arabic. This mixture is then allowed to ferment for 2-3 weeks before use.

 
(Top left) Old style mud bricks in Djenné (Djenné ferey),  and (top right) new type of bricks (toubabou ferey). August 2009. (Bottom left and right) Mortar preparation in for house and buildings covering, March 2009. Sacko (2021).

Becoming a house-builder in Djenné is not a simple process. All builders (called Barey in the local tongue) belong to a professional body, the barey-ton. In order to become a Barey a boy must be born into a family where this is a trade, and choose to take up the craft very young (this is not automatic). He will then begin an apprenticeship with a relative, usually his father, at the age of about seven, learning a series of skills before qualifying as a Barey in his own right sometime in his mid-twenties; despite this apprenticeship beginning under his father, an apprentice will often serve several different masters before graduating, although these will generally come from his extended family. Relationships between the Bareys and their clients is usually a very long-term affair, with the care of a home and the family who live in it generally being passed down from father to son. If a client wishes to change Barey for some reason, then he will need the permission of the Barey-ton to do so.

 
Different types of House Façade in Djenné, February 2010. Sacko (2021).

Since Djenné gained World Heritage status in 1988, a number of conservation and restoration projects have been launched in the city, although few of these have involved consultation with local communities, or the Barey-ton. This has created a situation in which local people sometimes feel excluded from the management of their own heritage. Even where projects are deemed necessary and useful by the local population, they have often been carried out in ways that are sound from a scientific and theoretical point of view, but which do not take into account the views and cultural knowledge of the people of Djenné.

 
Djenné’s Townscape, August 2011. Sacko (2021).

In 1995/6 a short-term project with financial backing from the Netherlands began carrying out rehabilitation of 168 monumental houses thought to represent the cultural identity well, carying out activities from minor repairs to total reconstruction, based upon either documentation of the prior state of the houses or people's memories. 

From 2004, a major project funded by the Aga Khan Trust for Culture began restoration work on the Great Mosques of Djenné and Mopti and the Djingereyber Mosque in Timbuktu as well as public spaces around them, which also included installation of new water and sanitation systems, street paving, early childhood education, training, health care and economic development. This has become the most high-profile restoration project in Djenné, and has relied heavily on the knowledge of traditional builders and craftsmen.

 
Mosque restoration site by Djenné’s inhabitants, May 2001.Sacko (2021).

In 2010 a report by the government of Mali noted that many houses in the area had been modified or repaired in ways inappropriate to their cultural heritage, often using modern building materials to make modifications that accommodate larger families or modern life-style choices. This report noted that one of the drivers of this was the high cost of traditional building materials. Following this the Mali Ministry of Culture, along with the Cultural Mission of Djenné and the World Heritage Earthen Architecture Programme, have begun looking into ways to develop town planning and construction regulations adapted to earthen architecture. The World Heritage Centre has noted that the absence of such regulations has led to a rise in new, inappropriate construction projects and poor property rehabilitation, and that, regardless of the good intentions of local players, these are likely to lead to a loss of the coherence of the urban fabric of Djenné without the implementation of regulations.

 
Traditional architecture in Djenné, August 2011. Sacko (2021).

In 2008 the Mali Ministry of Culture drew up an action plan for Djenné, with the objectives of improving sanitation management in the city, redefining the boundaries of registered sites within the communities, strengthening legal protections of sites within the new limits, improving the state of conservation of the city of Djenné and the archaeological sites, ensuring better promotion of the sites for visiting audiences, and promoting the intangible cultural heritage of the city.

Since this time the city has undergone a population boom and subsequent exponential urbanisation, creating a demand for territorial spaces for housing and other urban living amenities. This led to the creation of a new, reformed conservation plan in 2018, which aimed to review and update the urban planning diagram and establish sectoral urban planning for the city, strengthen the legal protection of the site in the context of decentralisation and regionalisation, undertake an emergency rescue programme for monumental architecture on threatened earth within the ancient fabric, and preserve and promote earthen architecture, strengthen the protection of archaeological sites, improve their state of conservation and fight against loss and illicit trafficking, carry out a wide-ranging awareness and information campaign in local communities on current cultural heritage and urban development issues, safeguard elements of intangible cultural heritage.

 
The Great Mosque and market of Djenné, March 2004. Sacko (2021).

The World Heritage Centre has recognised that the earthen architecture of Djenné and its neighbouring towns and cities is one of the most powerful expressions of the human ability to create built environments from local resources. However, this unique urban environment has been threatened by natural disasters, social conflicts, industrialisation, the urban explosion and the globalisation of models and standards for the design and construction of housing are factors contributing to the disappearance of traditional knowledge and sociocultural practices linked to the construction and maintenance of earthen architecture, leading to the placement of the city on the List of World Heritage in Danger. As a consequence of this, a number of preservation projects have been initiated, but most of these are led by foreign agencies and experts, with local people largely becoming spectators rather than participants. 

The restoration of the Great Mosque of Djenné was widely hailed as a successful project which had saved both Djenné’s architecture and the national identity, as well as promoting the area's tourism industry. However, for local people the project often highlighted the gap between traditional and modern techniques or approaches to construction. This appears to have raised the awareness of the local population's responsibility for their own cultural heritage conservation, and led to a much more unified approach to these issues.

 
Mosque conservation by Aga Khan Trust, before and after images, March 2011. Sacko (2021).

The area at the entrance to the city is outside of the conservation area, and has recently seen the construction of many new buildings using concrete, cement blocks, and fired clay as building materials, largely by successful emigrees from the city to Bamako, building second homes in Djenné. This area includes about 700 houses and four municipal buildings. Concerns about this have been raised by Djenné Patrimoine, a local conservation group, who feel that more culturally appropriate construction styles should be encouraged.

 
New construction in Djenné, March 2015. Sacko (2021).

Modern Djenné derives its income from rice farming, fishing, and livestock farming on the surrounding floodplains, though all of these have been impacted adversely by a series of severe droughts. When many of the conservation projects in Djenné were conceived, the city was beginning to develop a tourism industry around its cultural heritage. However, since 2012 a rebellion has broken out in the northern part of Mali (one of a series of conflicts which has bedevilled the Sahel region since the collapse of the Gadaffi regime in Libya in 2011), with several different groups fighting against one-another and the central government. During this conflict a number of foreign tourists have been taken hostage and either held for ransom or killed, effectively ending any hopes of developing a viable tourist industry in the country. This has resulted in the closure of many businesses that formerly relied on tourists for their income, as well as a very high rate of unemployment among (mostly young) former workers in the sector, many of whom have left to find work, either in Bamako or in other countries. This presents new challenges for the conservation of Djenné's traditional architecture, with preserving these buildings providing extra costs for their residents, while at the same time there has been a loss of the tangible benefits (in the form of extra income derived from tourism) associated with them. The preservation of Djenné's cultural herritage is now apparently being done solely for the people of the city, but often according to the designs of outside agencies.

 
Tourist Facilities in ruins, March 2015. Sacko (2021).

The traditional architecture of Djenné requires regular maintenance and restoration work to prevent it from slowly collapsing. This is an expensive process, and the typical residents of the city are far from wealthy. A flourishing tourist industry would increase both the willingness of the people of Djenné to finance this work and their motivation for doing so. This raises the question of exactly whom Djenné is being preserved for, the international community, or the people of the city itself.

The architecture of Djenné and its neighbouring cities is made and maintained by a unique group of traditional craftsmen, the Barey, who undergo a strict apprenticeship process, forming a closed artisan union and community, and the Barey of Djenné are particularly renowned for their skills within the region. As well as their construction and craft skills, the Barey also use complex magical rituals in the building process, which secrets passed on by a master only to his most trusted apprentice(s), and which may be taken to the grave if no suitable candidate is available.

 
The Chief Barey of Djenné, May 2004. Sacko (2021).

The conservation of Djenné's architecture in any meaningful sense must inevitably involve the Barey, a group whom Oussouby Sacko has been studying for over 25 years, and about whom he has published numerous studies, covering the structure and uses of the houses they build, the origins of the group and the Barey-tom (their professional association), their place in the city's social structure, and their spiritual role, which mixes elements of Islam with elements of older local beliefs. During the time that Sacko has studies the Barey have undergone somewhat of a crisis, with their skills being under used for a time, due to both economic pressures and a changing culture that placed more emphasis on modernity, which resulted in fewer young people looking to join the trade. Following the Mosque restoration project, a greater sense of cultural identity has emerged in the city, making a career as a Barey more desirable, but this left a severe age gap within the Barey-ton, with master builders often much older than their apprentices. This has potentially significant consequences, due to the strict way in which information is passed on, with skills and secrets only passes to apprentices (never sideways to other Barey-masters), and only when the apprentices are deemed ready to be taught.

As part of this study Sacko carried out structured interviews with three of Djenné's most senior Barey, Béré Yonou, who is currently the oldest Barey in Djenné at 84, Nouhoum Toure, an educated Songhai Barey (most Barey, including the other two interviewees, come from the Bozo ethnic group), and Mafoune (Sésé) Dienepo, who has been an active participant in recent conservation projects, and is the lead Barey of the Maison de Djenné Patrimoine.

 
Béré Yonou, March 2017. Sacko (2021).

Béré Yonou is a descendant of Ousmane Yonou and Soumaila Yonou, two famous historical Barey from Djenné, and is currently the last master Barey of the family. He studied under his father from the age of six, then, after his father died when he was fifteen became a disciple (senior apprentice) to his father's younger brother. He has been an independent Barey since 1979, and has been responsible for the building of numerous properties using the traditional Djenné ferey. Yonou reports that before beginning a building project, it is necessary to measure out the site by foot, then listen to the sound the ground makes when tapped, and performing any ceremonies deemed necessary before construction can be started. The first bricks are then placed at the corners of the property, and further rituals performed, before building commences, working from the corners towards the centre. When learning the trade an apprentice must learn a number of skills in order: how to carry earthen mortar, how to pass bricks, how to make foundations, how to stack bricks, how to assemble roofs, and how to paint walls. The trade also has a number of secrets, which can only be taught to the most trusted disciples, and which it is forbidden to disclose to others, including other master Barey. If no suitable disciple can be found, then these secrets die with the master.

 
Nouhoum Toure, March 2017. Sacko (2021).

Nouhoum Toure was born at Douanza, in the Dogon Mountains to the northeast of Mopti. His father came from Djenné, and was one of the master Barey involved in the early twentieth century restoration of the Great Mosque, but following a dispute, was forced to leave Djenné, along with the six other master Barey who worked on the project. His father was the only one of these Barey to return to Djenné, dying their in 1961. Unlike most Barey, his father kept a Tariq (written record) of his trade, including the Mosque restoration project) from which Nouhoum Toure has learned many skills and secrets. Nouhoum Toure is a descendent of Moussa Toure, an important figure in the history of Djenné, but his family have left and returned to the area several times. His great-grandfather, Ibrahima Toure, was a noted scholar who migrated to Djenné from Goundam, in the north to the west of Timbuktu, and his grandfather, Issa Toure, was a slave merchant as well as a Barey. Nouhoum Toure learned his skills principally from his father, but when he was an apprentice, also studied under his father's brothers and cousins. He became an independent Barey in 1972. He notes that there are rivalries among the Barey, which outsiders do not often percieve, and that thse can seriously hamper or undermine building projects. He believes the most important aspect of the Barey's trade is the correct preparation of the Banco (clay mixture) used in construction, of which there are seven types (confusingly known as Labou: Labou bibi (black), Labou chiri (red), Labou Korendi, Labou couscous, Djamaye Labou (banco for pottery), Labou Kora (yellow), and Labou do (banco which contains sand). A number of other materials are also used in the laying of foundations, including rice, two types of grain, charcoal, cotton seeds, and treasure shells. He further states that to become a master Barey, an apprentice must learn a number of rituals, including Tinyeda (soil fortune-telling), learning how to determine the start date for any project, and the correct rituals to be performed on the 2nd, 12th, 17th, 22nd and 27th of every lunar month. Ideally a Barey should not work on the 27th and the last Wednesday of each lunar month. These secrets can only be passed on the most trusted apprentices, chosen by careful observation of their skills and character.

 
Mafoune (Sésé) Dienepo, March 2017. Sacko (2021).

Mafoune (Sésé) Dienepo is a descendent of Tassey Nassire, a Barey who moved to Djenné from Dandy in northern Mali, with a Maiga family (a religious Songhai clan) that came to Djenné to open a religious school. Tassey Nassire had twin sons, who became the most renowned Djenné Barey of their generation, one of whom, Saoudatou Nassire, was Mafoune (Sésé) Dienepo's maternal grandfather. Tassey Nassire's wife (and Saoudatou Nassire's mother), was also a Barey, called Saby Dienepo. Her brother was another Barey, and Mafoune (Sésé) Dienepo's paternal grandfather. His father Mahamane Dienepo was also a Barey, although Mafoune (Sésé) Dienepo, one of 13 children, was originally apprenticed to a distant cousin, before becoming his father's disciple. After becoming an independent Barey he moved to Mopti for a while, to broaden his skill base, before returning to Djenné. He believes that rituals are an important part of the construction process; a Sheep should be sacrificed before construction begins, and its blood sprinkled on the site, and a number of materials, including grain, cotton and kola nuts, placed within the foundations. If a Djinn is present at the site, it can be removed in a special earthenware pot called a Dagua. Other rituals must be performed if anyone falls sick during the construction process. Construction should always start with the laying of three bricks at each of the corners of the property, and, if the site has been used before, then permission to build there must be obtained from the Barey who previously built there. The secrets of the trade can generally only be passed on to an disciple whom the master has carefully observed for some time, although sometimes a dream will tell a master to pass on certain secrets to certain apprentices.

 
Ingredients used for mortar and offerings for site preparation, March 2011, Mopti, Djenné. Sacko (2021).

All three of the Barey interviewed reiterated that rituals are an important part of the construction process in Djenné, and the process of becoming a Barey is a complex one, and not simply dependent on hereditary. A master Barey must be a skilled in construction and ritual magic, as well as in good religious standing. This creates problems for the recruitment and training of new Barey, as apprenticeships who master the construction skills may not master the magical skills. In recent years a division has developed between older, classically trained Barey, and younger Barey who often combine the traditional skills with skills learned at school or college.

 
Maison du Patrimoine de Djenné, September 2015. Sacko (2021).

If the architecture of Djenné is being preserved purely for the benefits of its people, to protect their cultural identity and heritage, then the potential exists to adapt this work to better match the desired of those people, and to have homes better suited to modern living. Those people who have had their homes restored by the conservation projects have clearly benefitted from this process, although there has been some friction, as residents have typically seen the projects as an opportunity to improve and modernise their homes, rather than restore them to some historic ideal which is often seen as cramped and impractical. Many local residents have also come to see the adoption of clay roofing tiles as being a practical way to protect their homes against seasonal rains, something which UNESCO does not support, on aesthetic grounds. This has created a dichotomy between UNESCO's vision of the city as a place of important historical significance which should be preserved for all mankind, and the local population's desire to have a modern living space.

Sacko notes that the imposition of rules on the maintrnance of buildings in Djenné by UNESCO can potentially interfere with the United Nations' stated goals of enabling all people to have shelter and freedom from constant anxiety about it. Over a hundred of Djenné's traditional houses have now been restored, and, on the whole, their residents have stated that they are happy with the process, and have developed a better understanding of the importance of the architecture as a result. When the city had a growing tourism industry, historical accuracy in the preservation of buildings seemed to be an important goal, but now that that has evaporated, it is not unreasonable that more account of the material needs of the people of Djenné should be taken into account during future projects. To this end Sacko recommends that the local community is more heavily involved in setting out goals for future preservation work, as they are the best placed people to determine the ballance between the need to preserve the city's architecture, and the need to accommodate the needs of those living in the city. 

See also...














Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.

 

Thursday, 12 August 2021

UNESCO adds seven new sites to its World Herritage List.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) has added seven new sites to its World Herritage List, according to a press release issued on 26 July 2021. Four of these sites have been added for their natural herritage: Amami-Oshima Island, Tokunoshima Island, northern part of Okinawa Island, and Iriomote Island (Japan), Getbol, Korean Tidal Flats (Republic of Korea), Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex (Thailand) and Colchic Rainforests and Wetlands (Georgia); while three have been added for the cultural significance: Arslantepe Mound (Turkey), Extension of Defence Lines of Amsterdam, henceforth to be known as Dutch Water Defence Lines (Netherlands) and the transnational site of Colonies of Benevolence (Belgium and Netherlands).

The Amami-Oshima Island, Tokunoshima Island, northern part of Okinawa Island, and Iriomote Island site emcompasses 427 km² of subtropical rainforests on four islands on a chain located in the southwest of Japan, the serial site forms an arc on the boundary of the East China Sea and Philippine Sea whose highest point, Mount Yuwandake on Amami-Oshima Island, rises 694 metres above sea level. Entirely uninhabited by Humans, the site has high biodiversity value with a very high percentage of endemic species, many of them globally threatened. The site is home to endemic Plants, Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, inland water Fish and Decapod Crustaceans, including, for example, the endangered Amami Rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi, and the endangered Ryukyu Long-haired Rat, Diplothrix legata, that represent ancient lineages and have no living relatives anywhere in the world. Five Mammal species, three Bird species, and three Amphibian species in the property have been identified globally as Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) species. There are also a number of different endemic species confined to each respective island that are not found elsewhere in the site.

 
Mangrove forest (Nakama River, Iriomote Island), of the World Heritage site 'Amami-Oshima Island, Tokunoshima Island, northern part of Okinawa Island, and Iriomote Island'. Ministry of the Environmen, Japan.

The Getbol Tidal Flats of Korea are situated in the eastern Yellow Sea on the southwestern and southern coast of the Republic of Korea, the site comprises four component parts: Seocheon Getbol, Gochang Getbol, Shinan Getbol and Boseong-Suncheon Getbol. The site exhibits a complex combination of geological, oceanographic and climatologic conditions that have led to the development of coastal diverse sedimentary systems. Each component represents one of four tidal flat subtypes (estuarine type, open embayed type, archipelago type and semi-enclosed type). The site hosts high levels of biodiversity, with reports of 2150 species of flora and fauna, including 22 globally threatened or near-threatened species. It is home to 47 endemic and five endangered marine invertebrate species besides a total of 118 migratory Bird species for which the site provides critical habitats. Endemic fauna includes Mud Octopus, Octopus minor, and deposit feeders like Japanese Mud Crabs, Macrophthalmus japonica, Fiddler Crabs, Uca lactea, and Polychaetes (Bristle Worms), Stimpson’s Ghost Crabs, Ocypode stimpsoni, Yellow Sea Sand Snails, Umbonium thomasi, as well as various suspension feeders like Clams. The site demonstrates the link between geodiversity and biodiversity, and demonstrates the dependence of cultural diversity and Human activity on the natural environment.

 
Autumn in Suncheonman Bay. World Heritage Promotion Team of the Korean Tidal Flats.

The Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex of Thailand is located along the Thailand side of the Tenasserim mountain range, part of a north-south granite and limestone mountain ridge running down the Malay Peninsula. Located at the cross-roads between the Himalayan, Indochina, and Sumatran faunal and floral realms, the property is home to rich biodiversity. It is dominated by semi-evergreen/dry evergreen and moist evergreen forest with some mixed deciduous forest, montane forest, and deciduous Dipterocarp forest. A number of endemic and globally endangered plant species have been reported in the property, which overlaps with two Important Bird Areas and is noted for its rich diversity of Birdlife, including eight globally threatened species. The lpcality is home to the critically endangered Siamese Crocodile, Crocodylus siamensis, the endangered Asiatic Wild Dog, Cuon alpinus, Banteng, Bos javanicus, Asian Elephant, Elephas maximus, Yellow/Elongated Tortoise, Indotestudo elongata, and the endangered Asian Giant Tortoise, Manouria emys, as well as several other vulnerable species of Birds and Mammals. Remarkably, it is also home to eight Cat species: the endangered Tiger, Panthera tigris, and Fishing Cat, Prionailurus viverrinus, near-threatened Leopard, Panthera pardus, and Asian Golden Cat, Catopuma temminckii, the vulnerable Clouded Leopard, Neofelis nebulosi, and Marbled Cat, Pardofelis marmorata, as well as Jungle Cat, Felis chaus, and Leopard Cat, Prionailurus bengalensis. 

 
Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex. Department of National Parks, Thailand.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature has acknowledged the World Heritage Committee’s decision to inscribe the Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex onto the World Heritage List, and the commitment expressed by the Government of Thailand to continue the work in progress relating to the site. The organisation has expressed willingness to support the Thai Government in its work with local communities and other concerned stakeholders to address the Committee’s decision, and uphold the World Heritage Convention’s own policies and high standards of conservation practice. However, it has also raised concerns about Human rights issues around the site which have yet to be resolved, in particular the need for indigenous Karen communities to provide their consent, and for their concerns to be resolved.

 
Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex. Sunee Sakseau/Department of National Parks, Thailand.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature further states that respecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities in conservation is a clearly stated policy of the World Heritage Convention and is central to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature mission and values. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s membership, composed of government, civil society and indigenous peoples’ organisations, sets the policies that guide the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s wider work. In this regard, The International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s Resolutions emphasise that nature conservation must respect the rights of indigenous peoples to the territories they have traditionally owned and used.

 
Herd of Gaurs, Bos gaurus, in the Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex. Sunee Sakseau/Department of National Parks, Thailand.

The Colchic Rainforests and Wetlands of Georgia site comprises seven component parts, within an 80 km long corridor along the warm-temperate and extremely humid eastern coast of the Black Sea. They provide a series of the most typical Colchic ecosystems at altitudes ranging from sea level to more than 2500 metres above it. The main ecosystems are ancient deciduous Colchic rainforests and wetlands, percolation bogs and other mire types of the distinct Colchic mire region. The extremely humid broad-leaved rainforests comprise a highly diverse flora and fauna, with very high densities of endemic and relict species, with significant numbers of globally threatened species and relict species, which survived the glacial cycles of the Tertiary. The site is home to approximately 1100 species of Vascular and non-Vascular Plants, including 44 threatened Vascular Plant species, and almost 500 species of Vertebrates, and a high number of Invertebrate species. The site also harbours 19 threatened Animal species including Sturgeon, notably the critically endangered Colchic Sturgeon, Acipenser persicus. It is a key stopover for many globally threatened Birds that migrate through the Batumi bottleneck.

 
Kolkheti National Park in Churia District, Georgia: visitor center and Bird-watching tower. Agency of Protected Areas of Georgia.

Arslantepe Mound is a 30-metre-tall archaeological tell located in the Malatya plain, 12 km south-west of the Euphrates River in Anatolian Turkey. Archaeological evidence from the site testifies to its occupation from at least the 6th millennium BC up until the late Roman period. The earliest layers of the Early Uruk period are characterized by adobe houses from the first half of the 4th millennium BC. The most prominent and flourishing period of the site was in the Late Chalcolithic period, during which the so-called palace complex was constructed. Considerable evidence also testifies to the Early Bronze Age period, most prominently identified by the Royal Tomb complex. The archaeological stratigraphy then extends to the Paleo-Assyrian and Hittite periods, including Neo-Hittite levels. The site illustrates the processes which led to the emergence of a State society in the Near East and a sophisticated bureaucratic system that predates writing. Exceptional metal objects and weapons have been excavated at the site, among them the earliest swords so far known in the world, which suggests the beginning of forms of organized combat as the prerogative of an elite, who exhibited them as instruments of their new political power.

 
Overview of Arslantepe mound in the Orduzu plain. MAIAO.

The Dutch Water Defence Lines represents a defence system extending over 200 km along the edge of the administrative and economic heartland of Holland. It is comprised of the New Dutch Waterline and the Defence Line of Amsterdam. Built between 1815 and 1940, the system consists of a network of forts, dikes, sluices, pumping stations, canals and inundation polders, working in concert to protect the Netherlands by applying the principle of temporary flooding of the land. It has been developed thanks to the special knowledge of hydraulic engineering for defence purposes held and applied by the people of the Netherlands since the 16th century. Each of the polders along the line of fortifications has its own inundation facilities.

 
Dutch Water Defence Lines (extension of the Defence Line of Amsterdam). Fortified town of Gorinchem. New Dutch Waterline.

The transnational Colonies of Benevolence encompasses four settlements; cultural landscapes with one colony in Belgium and three in The Netherlands. Together they bear witness to a 19th century experiment in social reform, an effort to alleviate urban poverty by establishing agricultural colonies in remote locations. Established in 1818, Frederiksoord (the Netherlands) is the earliest of these colonies and home to the original headquarters of the Society of Benevolence, an association which aimed to reduce poverty at the national level. Other components of the property are the colonies of Wilhelminaoord and Veenhuizen, in the Netherlands, and Wortel in Belgium. As the colonies’ small farms yielded insufficient revenues, the Society of Benevolence sought other sources of revenue, contracting with the State to settle orphans, soon followed by beggars and vagrants, leading to the creation of 'unfree' colonies, such as Veenhuizen, with large dormitory type structures and larger centralised farms for them to work under the supervision of guards. The colonies were designed as panoptic settlements along orthogonal lines. They feature residential buildings, farm houses, churches and other communal facilities. At their peak in the mid-19th century, over 11 000 people lived in such colonies in the Netherlands. In Belgium their number peaked at 6000 in 1910. 

 
Frederiksoord Colony of Benevolence. Province of Drenthe.

See also...














Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.