At three minute past eleven pm on
7 May 1991 the brightest fireball (large meteor) ever recorded was observed
over the Czech Republic. This was recorded by four all-sky and two spectral
cameras at three observatories belonging to the European Fireball Network,
enabling detailed recording of its trajectory, spectrographic analysis of its
chemistry and reconstruction of its orbit, and enabling a very detailed
estimate of the area where any surviving fragments might have fallen. As this
was only the third instrumentally recorded meteor fall (after Příbram in 1961,
Lost City in 1971 and Innisfree in 1978) and was clearly a particularly large
object, there were great hopes for material from the Benešov Superbolide being
recovered. However several extensive searches failed to recover any such
material.
Detail of the Benešov Superbolide recorded by the fixed all-sky camera at
Telč station showing the main terminal flare at a height of 24 km from where a
cloud of small fragments originated. Spurný et
al. (2014).
Since the Benešov a number of
such bolides have been observed and tracked in order to locate debris which
have reached the Earth’s surface (notably Morávka in 2000, Neuschwanstein in
2002, Villalbeto de la Peña in 2004, Bunburra Rockhole in 2007, Jesenice in
2009, Košice in 2010 and Mason Gully in 2010), enabling scientists to
considerably improve the methods involved.
The Benešov was recorded from
three observation stations, Ondřejov, Telč, and Přimda, equipped with fixed
high resolution fish-eye cameras which recorded all-sky hemisphere images.
These cameras had rotating shutters which caused 12.5 interruptions per second.
The Ondřejov station also had a guided camera used to determine the time of the
fireball, though images from both Ondřejov stations were badly overexposed. The
event was also observed with two spectrographic cameras, producing the most
detailed spectrographic recordings of a fireball event ever recorded.
Modern GPS technology has enabled
more precise positioning of the three observatories than was possible in 1991.
At the time the positions of the observatories were calculated using 1:25 000
scale topographic maps; the units have now been placed with GPS units with a
precision of 10 cm, leading to the precise longitude and latitude of each
station being adjusted by as much as 20 m. Improvements in computer technology
have enabled considerably improved calculations of bolide trajectories to be
made from recorded images, and (importantly) an error made in the recording of
the time on the Telč images (which at the time was done by hand) was detected
by analysis of the position of the stars using modern software and corrected.
This led to a revision of the
calculated location of the meteorite fall by about 385 m to the southwest,
placing any such material in a ploughed field rather than coppiced woodland,
and explaining the inability of searchers in the 1990s to find any meteorite
material.
Detail of the terminal part of the Benešov bolide, where the projection
of the original trajectory solution (dashed line) is plotted along with the new
solution from 2011(filled line). Spurný et
al. (2014).
This data also enabled Spurný et al. to recalculate the orbital
properties of the Benešov Superbolide, which they calculate had a 1429 day
orbital period and a highly eccentric orbit tilted at an angle of 24˚ to the
plane of the Solar System, which took it from 0.92 AU from the Sun (i.e. 0.92
times the average distance at which the Earth orbit the Sun) to 4.04 AU from
the Sun (4.04 times the average distance at which the Earth orbits the Sun, and
considerably more than twice the distance at which the planet Mars orbit the
Sun). This would make the Benešov Superbolide an Apollo Group Asteroid, i.e. an
asteroid which spends most of it time outside the orbit of Earth, but which
does occasionally pass closer to the Sun than us.
Heliocentric orbit of the Benešov meteoroid projected onto the plane of
the ecliptic along with the orbits of all inner planets and Jupiter and the
direction to the vernal equinoctial point. Spurný et al. (2014).
The Benešov Superbolide is
calculated to have been between one and two meters in diameter, with a mass of
about 4100 kg (4.1 tons). It is known to have undergone a final bright flare at
an altitude of 24.4 km, interpreted as an airburst in which the bolide reached
a sufficiently high temperature to explode. In 1991 it was believed that such
an explosion would leave only a few large fragments intact, which would
continue along the original path of the bolide until impacting the ground.
Since then it has been realized that a much larger proportion of such objects
will survive as smaller fragmentary material, with the Benešov Superbolide
likely to produce around 250 000 fragments in the 1-10 g range including around
40 000 fragments larger than 5 g, for a total mass of 800-1000 kg, most of
which would reach the ground.
Such small fragments would be
heavily influenced by wind-speeds (also not fully appreciated in 1991). On 7
May 1991 the highest winds in the area were found at altitudes of between 5 and
12 km, and were blowing from the west and southwest, shifting the likely impact
area for any small fragments roughly 2.5 km to the east-north-east.
New trajectory of the fireball with marked position of the main flare
and the corresponding impact area for small pieces that originated in this flare.
Spurný et al. (2014).
The area where any meteorite
remains is calculated to have fallen lies in a field which has been ploughed at
least 20 times since the Benešov event, and which is subject to winter frosts
reaching a depth of 30 cm. This is not conducive to the preservation of
meteorite remains at the surface, making it likely that any meteorite remains
will have been buried at depth of 30-40 cm, and that they will have undergone considerable
surface alteration, making them hard to distinguish from other rocks found
locally.
Such conditions are far from
ideal for searching for meteorite remains, however spectrographic analysis of
the Benešov fireball suggested that the meteorite was chondritic in nature, and
likely to have a very high iron content. This suggested that it might be
possible to search for meteorites with metal detectors. Spurný et al. therefore assembled a team of
about 20 searchers, and having gained permission from the landowner (searching
the land without such permission would be illegal in the Czech Republic) made a
series of transverse scans of the field a few hundred meters long and about
fifteen meters wide, centred on the calculated line of highest probability for
meteorite finds.
Details on meteorite finds and their positions with respect to the
predicted impact line and impact area. Spurný et al. (2014).
The initial search took place on
9 April 2011, when several tens of samples were located, had their positions
recorded with portable GPS units, were collected, weighed and labelled. These
samples were then returned to the lab where they were cleaned, weighed,
photographed and more carefully inspected, resulting in all but eight being
rejected as possible meteorites. These remaining samples were further cleaned
by ultrasound, then had part of their surfaces brushed and examined by
microscope, eventually determining that two samples were genuine meteorites (a
better result than was expected). Further visits to the site on 21 April 2011
and 25 April 2012 (when a method involving sieving topsoil from close to the
line was employed) yielded two more such meteorites.
First three Benešov meteorites found by metal detectors in April 2011.
From left to right: 1.56 g H5 chondrite (M1), 7.72 g LL3.5 chondrite with
achondrite clast (M2), and 1.99 g LL3.5 chondrite (M3). Spurný et al. (2014).
There is a faint possibility that
these meteorite could have come from some event other than the Benešov
Superbolide. However the meteorites do not appear to be more than a few decades
old and the area in question has been scanned for meteors photographically on
every clear night since 1951, and photoelectrically on every night, clear or
otherwise, since 1999. The area also has a reasonably high population density,
with a high level of public interest in such events, making it unlikely that
any such events would fail to be recorded. As the meteorites found were of a
size which implies a parent body in excess of a meter in diameter, and only
about 40 such objects strike the entire surface of the Earth each year, seldom
going un-noticed in populated areas, the chances of tow such events happening
in the same area within a few decades and one of them not being recorded are
considered negligible.
The first meteorite discovered
(M1) is an H chondrite (High Iron Chondrite) which weighed 2.91 g when found and 1.54 g
after cleaning. It lacks a fusion crust (the outer layer of a meteorite formed
by melting of its surface by the friction with the atmosphere) and it outer
surface was heavily weathered. A section of the meteorite examined under the
petrographic microscope revealed that it had a fairly homologous composition,
with some chondrules (large distinct clasts of different material within the
matrix) which appear to have been recrystallized as a result of thermal
metamorphism. The rock contains olivine, low- and high-calcium pyroxene and
plagioclase silicate minerals, with extensive shock-fracture features within
the olivine. Heavy weathering of the sample has led to oxidation of about 80%
of the iron and nickel minerals.
Backscattered electron images documenting the texture of H5 lithology
of meteorite M1 – designated as Benešov (b). All Fe-Ni phases and troilite are
strongly oxidized from weathering processes, and weathering products also fill
visible microfractures. Spurný et al. (2014).
The second meteorite examined
(M2) is an LL chondrite (Low Iron Low Total Metal Chondrite) which weighed 12.93 g when discovered and
7.72 g after weighing. This meteorite was also heavily weathered, and lacked a
fusion crust. Microscopic examination of a thick section revealed a
fine-grained matrix with well-defined chondrules. The silicate minerals were
dominated by olivine, low-calcium pyroxene and plagioclase, as well as weathered
alcalic glass. Iron and nickel minerals were again predominantly oxidised. The
chodrules are 0.2-1.9 mm across and chemically distinct from the matrix, being
dominated by olivins and low calcium pyroxene, with alkaline glasses with a
variety of chemical compositions also present. Shock features are present in
the olivine, pyroxene and plagioclase minerals, suggesting shock pressures in
the range of 15-20 giga-Pascals.
Backscattered electron images documenting the texture of the LL3.5
lithology of meteorite M2 – designated as Benešov (a). Well-defined chondrules
and fine-grained matrix are disrupted by a network of microfractures filled by
weathering products. Spurný et al. (2014).
The meteorite also contained a large
clast of achondritic material measuring approximately 4.8 by 2.6 mm. thi
achondritic clast is cemented to the chondritic material by an irregular vein
of impact melt, and has a composition dominated by olivine and low-calcium
pyroxene, with anorthitic plagioclase and high calcium pyroxene also present.
Contact between LL3.5 lithology and achondritic clast of meteorite M2 –
Benešov (a). The achondritic clast is cemented to LL3.5 lithology by an
irregular vein of impact melt. Spurný et
al. (2014).
The third meteorite collected
(M3) weighed 2.29 g when found and 1.99 g after cleaning. This also lacked a
fusion crust and was heavily weathered, and petrographically resembled the
LL3.5 chondrite material from the second meteorite.
Backscattered electron images documenting the texture of the LL3.5
lithology of meteorite M3 – designated as Benešov (a). Well-defined chondrules
and fine-grained matrix are disrupted by a network of microfractures filled by
weathering products. Spurný et al. (2014).
The fourth meteorite weighed 0.50
g when collected and 0.38 grams after cleaning. This meteorite was not examined
petrographically.
Spurný et al. believe that the meteorites all share a common parent body,
which they propose had a brecciated composition (i.e. was made up of large
pieces of material with different mineral compositions), which would account
for the different mineralogy of meteorite M1 compared to M2 and M3, and for the
large clast of mineralogically distinct material within M2. As such they wished
to name all the meteorite as ‘Benešov Meteorites’. However the Nomenclature
Committee of the Meteoritical Society did not accept this, due to the
distinctive mineralogy of M1 (this is not entirely unreasonable, as such formal
name and descriptions are used to compare meteorites to other meteorites, and a
formal designation which includes meteorites with different compositions could
be problematic). Spurný et al.
therefore classed M2 and M3 together as ‘Benešov (a) Meteorites’, while M1 is classed
as a ‘Benešov (b) Meteorite’.
Brecciated compositions in
meteorites and asteroids are a relatively new idea, and a few years ago would
have proved highly controversial. However the Almahata Sitta meteorite fall of
2009(?) has also been shown to contain brecciated material, as has asteroid (21)
Lutetia, confirming that such lithologies are possible and do occur in
asteroids.
See also…
The nature of the Nathdwara Meteorite.
On 25 December 2012 at about 6.20 pm local time a single meteorite fell in a field near the town of Nathdwara in southern Rajastan. The meteorite was an oblong shape, 12 cm along its longest axis, and weighed about 1.5 kg. It was covered by a dark fusion crust, formed by melting of its outer surfaces by friction as it...
The Chelyabinsk Meteorite and its implications for the origin of the Baptistina Asteroid Family.
The Chelyabinsk Meteorite detonated in the atmosphere over the southern Russia on 15 February 2013 with an equivalent energy to 500 kilotons of TNT. From the size of the explosion it is estimated to have been an...
The nature of the Košice Meteorites.
On 28 February 2010 a meteor shower fell over Slovakia, accompanied by a bright fireball and a series of sonic booms. Subsequently a number of meteorites were recovered from the area to the northwest of the city of Košice, in the east of the country, most within four weeks of the observed shower (meteors are ‘shooting stars’ observed in the sky, a meteorite is...
.png)
.gif)
.jpg)
