Sunday, 7 December 2025
Did an unknown volcanic eruption create the conditions for the Black Death to enter medieval Europe?
Thursday, 5 December 2024
The beads of Mozambique Island.
Mozambique Island, on the northern coast of the African country of the same name, was the first place where Portuguese explorers, having rounded the Cape of Good Hope, encountered the trade networks of the Indian Ocean. At this time the island was ruled by a Muslim sheikh, with merchants using the island as a base from which to trade with the African interior or wider Indian Ocean needing his permission to do so, with all such merchants needing to be Muslims themselves. The island was quickly brought under Portuguese rule, with a Captain appointed to rule the island on behalf of the Portuguese Crown, and became a crucial stopover on the journey between Lisbon and Goa. While the Portuguese Captain in theory had control over all commerce occurring in the port, in practice many commodities were not regulated, and the island gained as a reputation as place where fortunes could be made with little interference from the Portuguese authorities.
During the Early Modern Era, beads were extensively used by European traders as a means of currency, being both a portable, high value item, and a desirable commodity which they could control the supply of. This certainly appears to have been the case on Mozambique Island, where large numbers of beads, many of them apparently derived from shipwrecks off the coast of the island, are today collected from the island's sandy beaches and made into necklaces, which are then sold to tourists.
In a paper published in the journal World Archaeology on 22 November 2024, Tânia Manuel Casimiro of História, Territórios e Comunidades at Nova University Lisbon, Yolanda Duarte of Archaeology at Eduardo Mondlane University, and Jéssica Iglésias, also of História, Territórios e Comunidades at Nova University Lisbon, present the results of an analysis of the origin of beads from Mozambique Island, and the implications of this for the history of the island.
Today, beads are collected by shovelling sand from the beaches into 25-50 kg bags and taking these to a flat, clean surface, where the sand can be sifted through for beads. No permit is needed for this activity, and no attention paid to the archaeological context of the beads by the collectors. However, some of the necklaces made by the bead-gatherers have been obtained by local people with an interest in the island's heritage, and it is from such collections that Casmiro et al. gained the beads used in their study.
Casmiro et al. examined a sample of 12 166 beads, recording the material they were made from, as well as their style. Many of the glass beads were apparently Venetian, with Venice being a major manufacturing centre for beads used as colonial trade goods from the sixteenth century onwards, although Casmiro et al. note that many 'Venetian' beads were in fact made in other European cities in imitation of the Venetian style. However, such beads are clearly of European origin, easily distinguished from Indian beads (also very common around the Indian Ocean) which tend to be carved from a mineral such as carnelian or agate. Because of the way in which the beads were obtained, it was not possible to date them by context, although it was possible to build up a limited chronology for beads from the sixteenth to nineteenth century, with a few beads coming from outside this period.
The majority of the beads (10 626) were made of glass. Most of these were of a single colour, with examples of white, black, blue, green, yellow, orange, and red beads being found, along with some which combine a several colours. These glass beads also vary greatly in shape, with tubular, oblate, cylindrical, ellipsoidal, spherical, bicone, and barrel-shaped beads all present. After glass beads, the most common were stone beads, followed by coral, shell, bone, ivory, and plastic.
The most common glass beads (7789 examples) are seed beads, small spherical beads at most a few millimetres across, which have been manufactured in Europe since at least the fifteenth century. Another common type are Green Heart Beads (540 examples), cylindrical glass beads made up of layers of different glass, with the innermost being green, giving a shimmering, multi-hued effect, which were produced in Venice between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries.
Hudson's Bay Beads (235 examples), sometimes also known as White Heart Beads, or Cornaline d’Aleppo, were made in Venice between 1830 and the early 1900s. These again were cylindrical beads with multiple layers, this time having an inner layer of white or yellow glass.
Chevron beads (11 examples) were elongate beads made by building up multiple layers of glass onto a central star-shaped moulded cane. These beads were invented in the late fifteenth century by craftswoman Marietta Barovier of Murano, and made at a number of glassworks in Murano and Venice, and probably elsewhere, although it is not generally possible to tell where an individual bead was made.
A-Speo beads (186 examples) were made by drawing out a thick glass straw, which was then chopped into short segments. These segments were then placed on a metal rod, and placed in a furnace to melt them into a rounded shape (the name 'a-speo' derives from the Italian phrase for 'to skewer'). This technique was probably invented in Venice or Murano, but was practiced in many areas of Europe.
Skunk beads (14 examples), were made in Venice (and probably other European bead-making centres) in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, by adding small globules of glass to an a larger glass bead of a different colour, to give a speckled effect. These were most commonly black with added white speckles, hence the name 'skunk beads', but other colour patterns were also produced.
Tubular beads (12 examples) were first made in Venice in the fifteenth century, but due to their ease of manufacture, continued to be made at centres across Europe for the next six centuries. Padre, or Pekin Glass, beads were made in Venetian and Czech workshops in the nineteenth century, in imitation of blue glass beads from China, themselves made as a cheaper substitute for jade beads.
Millefiori beads are glass with complicated floral patterns, made since Roman times. They are manufactured by producing glass canes with a flower-shaped cross-section, which are then cut into thin slices, which are in turn incorporated within blown glass products, including beads. The name millefiori derives from the Italian for 'thousand flowers'.
Eye beads (2 examples), which superficially resemble eyes, have been made around the Mediterranean Basin, the Middle East, and South Asia for thousands of years, often as a charm against the Evil Eye. The earliest forms were made of clay, but the manufacture of glass eye beads can be traced back to about 1500 BC.
'King' or 'Golo' beads (2 examples) were made in Europe in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries as a high value trade item for African markets. There were large, striped, biconed beads which came in a range of colours, though green beads with yellow, black, and red stripes were the most common.
Dog Teeth, or ruffled beads (two examples) were made in Venice in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, mostly for trade with Nigeria. These are black beads with an irregular shape, and a 'ruffle' of white marks (or 'teeth') around their centre.
A single Nueva Cadiz bead was found on Mozambique Island. These were squared, tubular beads in a distinctive blue colour, made originally in Venice for trade with the Americas, but which were subsequently made in a number of other European cities. These beads are very common at sites on the Atlantic coast of Africa, but surprisingly rare at sites on the Indian Ocean.
Bohemian beads (1147 examples) were made in the modern Czech Republic, where they developed a range of distinct techniques of their own, notably pressed glass. These beads often have vertical and horizontal lines, circular incisions, coloured bands, phytomorphic and zoomorphic decorations.
Russian blue beads (183 examples) were a distinctive type of Bohemian bead produced in the eighteenth centuries. These beads were multifaceted with six, seven, or eight sides, and typically a transparent blue, although amber, green, and clear examples are also known.
Vaseline beads (1 example), sometimes also called uranium beads because of the uranium used to tint the glass green, were large faceted of shaped beads made in Bohemia in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Haj beads (5 examples) were made in Bohemian the early twentieth century for export to the city of Mecca, where they were sold to pilgrims, often becoming heirloom objects within their families. Two of the examples found on Mozambique Island had moon-and-star symbols, while the remaining three had the name of the Prophet Mohammed written upon them.
Dutch opalescent beads (9 examples), sometimes known as moon beads, were glass beads made to resemble pearls by adding ash to the glass, made in the Netherlands, Bohemia, Germany, and Venice, in the eighteenth and nineteenth century.
Dogon beads (187 examples) are large, chunky beads with a rough texture, which were produced in Amsterdam and possibly Germany in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, principally for trade with the Dogon people of southern Mali, but were also traded to other areas of Africa.
Prosser beads (9 examples), sometimes known as Kakamba Prosser Beads after a town in what is now the Republic of Congo where they were popular. These were made in the nineteenth century by a French craftsman called Jean-Félix Bapterosses, who modified a technique developed by the Prosser Brothers of London to cold-press glass and porcelain buttons, instead producing disk-shaped opalescent beads.
While the majority of the examined beads were glass, stone beads were also common, with 996 in the collection. The most abundant stone types are jet and carnelian, with agate and garnet beads also quite common. Stone beads have been manufactured around the world, which can make it difficult to determine the origin of individual beads, although most stone beads found around the Indian Ocean originate from India or Southeast Asia. This potentially makes these beads the oldest on Mozambique Island, with some examples likely to have reached the island before the first Europeans.
Three beads from Mozambique Island were identified as being of Chinese origin, although details of these are not given. China began to export large volumes of beads in the early twentieth century, something it does to this day, and has produced beads from porcelain, wood, cinnabar, cloisonné, enamelled metal, stones, and glass, among other materials.
Filigree is a form of intricate metalwork consisting of tiny beads and twisted threads soldered together, made in the Islamic world largely between the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries. Fifty five silver elements from Mozambique Island are probably derived from filigree jewellery, most likely originating from Mauritania.
Beads derived from Animal materials such as shell, bone, ivory, and coral were also quite common (469 examples), although it is difficult to assess where these came from, as these materials are available, and have been worked, across much of the globe.
Plastic beads (8 examples) are clearly of twentieth century origin, since the first plastic (Bakalite) was invented by the Belgian-American chemist Leo Hendrick Baekelandin 1909. Plastic beads are cheap and easy to manufacture, and are produced in many countries. The low number of these on Mozambique Island suggests that they may never have been a commercial import, but may have been brought to the island by people wearing them, or possibly even have floated there on ocean currents.
Finally, five items were found in the collection that probably did not start out as beads, but which had been repurposed as such. These were a black glass button or pendant, two jet buttons, a rectangular piece of jet with three diagonal incisions of unknown origin, and what appeared to be the bottom half of a Frozen Charlotte doll (a type of rigid doll, typically made out of china, made between about 1850 and about 1920, mostly in Germany for the US market).
Casmiro et al.'s study revealed the presence of a wide range of beads, made from a variety of substances, on Mozambique Island. Despite this variety, about 90% of the beads were glass, and of European origin. Glass trade beads have been considered to be powerful symbols of European colonial influence, which seems to be particularly relevant on Mozambique Island, a vital trade hub within the Portuguese Empire. The beads of the same designs as those found on Mozambique Island have been found at other sites around the world, although overwhelmingly in colonial contexts.
Glass beads were, of course, made before the fifteenth century, and it can sometimes be hard to differentiate these from later beads, but none of the glass beads found on Mozambique Island appear likely to be this old. The stone, and animal-derived, beads found on the island may date to before the arrival of Europeans in the area, although such beads continue to be made until the present day, making it hard to be certain of their age. Mozambique Island is known to have been a trading hub before the arrival of the Portuguese, but it appears to have become much more important once integrated into the global Portuguese network.
Curiously, the high abundance of European beads on Mozambique Island is in contrast to the situation in South Africa, where European beads are unusual at archaeological sites, but beads from India quite common. It has been suggested that this South African preference for Indian beads may have been established before the arrival of European traders, and that with South African customers unwilling to switch, European traders may instead have imported beads from India to cater for this market.
Casmiro et al. also note that the beads once brought to Africa by Europeans to trade for commodities such as slaves, ivory, and gold, have now taken on a new role in places such as Mozambique Island, being traded back to European tourists as a means of gaining hard currency, a much needed twenty first century trade commodity.
See also...
Wednesday, 28 February 2024
Bronze Age metalworks found in northern Oman.
Archaeologists from the Polish Centre of Mediterranean Archaeology at the University of Warsaw have unearthed evidence of Bronze Age metalworking during exploratory work in the Qumayrah Valley of northern Oman. The team, who have been working in Oman since 2016, spent five weeks in the area in November and December 2024, uncovering about 50 structures associated with the Bronze Age Umm an-Nar and Wadi Suq cultures, as well as a smaller amount of Iron Age and later material, according to a press release issued on 12 February 2024.
The oldest structures found date to the Early Bronze Age Umm an-Nar Culture, which is thought to have lasted from about 2600 BC to about 2000 BC, and include round stone towers at the Ajran 1 and QB 6 localities, and a number of tower tombs at Ajran 4. This period appears to have seen a significant economic boom in the region, leading to a rise in population, and more archaeological remains being left behind than in subsequent periods.
This Umm an-Nar economic boom is thought to have been driven by long distance trade with India and Mesopotamia, with the main export from Oman being copper. Because of this, the Polish team have been searching for signs of copper working in the Qumayrah Valley. The discoveries made this season include a complex of sites around Wadi Salh, which include slag fields up to 220 m by 50 m and 25 cm to 50 cm thick, along with dozens of stone tools thought to have been used for crushing ore, and the remains of numerous furnaces. Several buildings thought to have been used as workshops have also been identified.
Iron Age remains are much less common in the region, but the team did find a site, QA 20, where what appears to have been an Iron Age observation tower and accompanying settlement was located at the intersection of two valleys. The settlement, thought to have dated to between 1100 BC and 600 BC, comprised a dense arrangement of adjoining houses on either side of a narrow street. Thirty three rooms have been excavated so far at this site, covering an area of about 1400 m².
See also...
Sunday, 20 August 2023
A meteoric iron arrowhead from the late Bronze Age of Switzerland.
The Iron Age is considered to have begun when people started smelting iron from iron oxide ores. However, some iron artefacts predate this, having been produced from a source which did not require smelting: meteoric iron. In the Old World, Bronze Age meteoric iron artefacts are known from Turkey, Greece, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, Iran, Russia, China, and Poland. To date, the entire complement of Bronze Age meteoric iron artefacts from Europe comprises two rings and an amulet from Greece, a pair of bracelets from Czestochowa-Rakowa in Poland, and an iron axe from Wietrzno, also in Poland. Attempts have recently been made to locate other meteoric iron objects in archaeological collections, using X-ray fluorescence analysis, concentrating on areas where meteoric iron is thought likely to have been available. One such potential source is the Twannberg iron meteorite strewn field in the Jura Mountains of Switzerland, which has led archaeologists to re-examine many Bronze Age artefacrs in Swiss museum collections.
In a paper published in the Journal of Archaeological Science on 25 July 2023, Beda Hofmann of the Naturhistorisches Museum Bern and the Institute of Geological Sciences at the University of Bern, Sabine Bolliger Schreyer of the Bernisches Historisches Museum, Sayani Biswas and Lars Gerchow of the Paul Scherrer Institute, Daniel Wiebe, Marc Schumann, Sebastian Lindemann, and Diego Ramírez Garíca of the Physics Insitute at the University of Freiburg, Pierre Lanari, also of the Naturhistorisches Museum Bern, Frank Gfeller, also of the Naturhistorisches Museum Bern and the Institute of Geological Sciences at the University of Bern, Carlos Vigo, Darbachan Das, and Fabian Hotz, also of the Paul Scherrer Institute, Katharina von Schoeler of the Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics at ETH Zürich, Kuzihiko Ninomiya of the Institute of Radiation Sciences at Osaka University, Megumi Niikura of the RIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator Based Science, Narongrit Ritjoho of the School of Physics at Suranaree University of Technology, and Alex Amato, again of the Paul Scherrer Institute, describe the discovery of a Bronze Age meteoric iron arrowhead in the collection of the Bernisches Historisches Museum.
The arrowhead (specimen number A/7396), was recovered from the Mörigen Pile Dwelling, a Bronze Age stilt house settlement attributed to the Urnfield Culture, on Lake Biel in Bern Canton, which is about 4-8 km south of the Twannberg iron meteorite strewn field. The Mörigen site was discovered by local fishermen in 1843, and was the subject of various amateur excavations until 1873, when the Bern government banned such activities, and arranged for a formal exploration of the site under the leadership of archaeologist Eduard von Jenner and geologist Edmund von Fellenburg. Exactly when arrowhead A/7396 was found is unclear, but it is thought to have been recovered during Jenner and Fellenburg's excavations in 1873 and 1874. It was first observed that the arrowhead was iron rather than bronze by Monika Bernatzky-Goetze in 1987, during a wider examination of arrowheads from Mörigen, though she made no further investigation of it at that time. It has a mass of 2.904 g, and measures 39.3 mm long, 25 mm wide, and 2.6 mm wide, and has a triangular blade with a 13 mm tang.
Hofmann et al. carried out a metallurgical comparison of arrowhead A/7396, comparing it to two fragments of the Twannberg Meteorite, TW1 (NMBE 36467) and TW934 (NMBE 43747), but found that it was metallurgically quite distinct from these, and therefore derived from a different meteorite. The arrowhead was also examined by light microscopy, X-ray micro-computer tomography, muon induced X-ray emission spectography, scanning electron microscopy, gamma spectroscopy, and Ramen spectroscopy.
The arrowhead is comprised of rust covered iron with a very laminated texture, in places patches of sediment can still be seen attached to the surface, and very small amounts of unrusted iron are visible within a crack on the surface. The surface of the arrowhead has grinding or scratch marks in several places, which are beneath the attached organic material and sediment particles where these are found on the same part of the arrowhead.
X-ray tomography revealed that the rust layer, although covering most of the sirface, is very thin (less than 0.1 mm). The crack observed visually can be seen to extend across almost the whole width of the arrowhead in X-ray tomography, and is largely filled with fine-grained silt sediment. -ray tomography also showed the arrowhead to be of uneven thickness, being 1.2 mm thick on one side, while the other is only 0.6 mm thick. The metal has a pronounced layering parallel to the frontal plane of the arrowhead, something which would not be expected in an iron meteorite, and which is therefore presumed to be an artefact of the way in which the arrowhead was made.
The Mörigen arrowhead is very flat, and has probably had its thickness increased somewhat by oxidation. This is not a natural shape for meteors or meteor fragments, suggesting that the metal has been flattened as well as being sharpened. Such working of the metal is a plausible origin for the laminations visible in the X-ray tomograph images of the arrowhead, which is probably a deformed Widmanstätten pattern (Widmanstätten patterns are interleaving of kamacite and taenite bands found in nickel-iron meteorites, where they are believed to be formed by very slow cooling of the metal, probably over millions of years). Similar patterns have been observed in artefacts from Greenland, which are known to have been made by cold working of material from the Cape York meteorite. These Greenland artefacts also have a very flat form, and a layered microstructure made from flattening of large kamacite and taenite grains. Hot working is also a possibility, though heating to above about 700° would probably result in the loss of the banding due to recrystallization. The grinding marks seen on the surface of the arrowhead in places may be a result of this working process. Thus, although the arrowhead is of a similar shape to the bronze arrowheads also found at Mörigen, it appears to have reached this shape via quite a different working process.
The oxidised surface of the arrowhead is a less than ideal target for X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, and is likely to be responsible for the variation in nickel concentrations across the surface of the object; up to 22%, which is improbable on an unoxidized surface, and probably results from element partition during the corrosion process. Muon induced X-ray emission spectography, which can penetrate the surface of objects, found that the nickel content increased and stabilised with depth in both the arrowhead and meteorite fragment TW934 (which also has an oxidised surface) but not meteorite fragment TW1, which does not. Iron, nickel, cobalt, gallium, and germanium, all typical components of iron-nickel meteorites, were all detected by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, as were arsenic and copper, which are much more unusual. High levels of lead were found on the parts of the arrowhead with white numbering, implying that a lead-oxide based paint was used.
Scanning electron microscopy revealed the presence of bith taenite and kamacite, which are nickel-rich and nickel-poor phases found in iron-nickel meteorites. Some organic material was present on the surface, and were sediment particles, showing calcium, carbon, oxygen, and silicon, which would fit with a mixture of calcium carbonate and quartz. The pigment of the label was found to contain bith leand and tin.
Gamma spectrometry of the arrowhead was able to detect the presence of the isotopes aluminium²⁶, potassium⁴⁰, uranium²³⁸, thorium²²⁸, cobalt⁶⁰, and cesium¹³⁷. Ramen spectroscopy of the organic material produced a signal typical of a tar-like material, which was probably birchwood tar used to attach the arrowhead to the arrow.
The presence of aluminium²⁶ strongly supports the meteoric origin of the metal suggested by the presence of nickel, cobalt, gallium, and germanium, and the ratios of iron to nickel and nickel to cobalt. The presence of the Widmanstätten patterns and taenite rule out an origin from the Twannberg Meteorite, fragments of which have only ever been found to contain kamacite. The concentrations of nickel and germanium in the metal are consistent with the parent meteor having mostly likely been an IAB type iron meteorite, such as the Cañon Diablo Meteorite from Arizona or the Campo de Cielo meteorites from Argentina. The composition of the metal could also correspond to an IC group meteorite, although these are much rarer, with only 13 known examples, none of them from Europe.
Aluminium²⁶ is a cosmogenic isotope, found close to the surface of iron-nickel Solar System bodies, where it is formed by cosmic rays bombarding magnesium²⁶, the element to which it also decays, with a half-life of 717 000 years. This short half-life means that aluminium²⁶ and magnesium²⁶ reach an equilibrium point, witht the proportion of aluminium²⁶ decreasing deeper within the body. The proportion in the metal of the Mörigen arrowhead implies that it was at a depth of about 40 cm when it was in the parent body, implying a meteorite with an original diameter of about 80 cm. Such a meteorite would have had a minimum mass of about two tonnes.
The metal of the arrowhead is likely to have undergone some modification since it arrived on Earth. The most obvious modification is the layer of rust (iron oxide) which has formed on its surface, but the presence of copper and arsenic, elements not usually found in nickel-iron meteorites, is probably a result of Human actions, possibly originating when the metal was worked with tools used to work on bronze, but also quite possibly a result of being stored with bronze items.
The chemical and isotopic composition of the Mörigen arrowhead suggests that it derived from an IAB type meteorite with a minimum mass of about two tonnes. Three large IAB meteorites with compositions compatible with the Mörigen arrowhead are known from Europe; the Bohumilitz Metoerite from the Czech Republic, the Retuerte de Bullaque Meteorite from Spain and the Kaalijarv Meteorite from Estonia. Of these, the Kaalijarv is known to have been particularly large, producing a series of craters, the largest of which, the Kaalijärv Crater on the island of Saarema in Estonia, is 110 m in diameter. This object is thought to have had an original mass of several hundred tonnes, most of which was destroyed during the impact, leaving only small fragments of shrapnel. A piece of shrapnel from the Kaalijarv Meteorite would be a plausible source for the metal of the Mörigen arrowhead, although it is possible that the metal was broken off a larger mass, with other iron artefacts (now lost to us) being made from the remaining material. About 10 kg of material has been recovered from the Kaalijarv Meteorite to date, with dating based upon the stratigraphic location of these fragments suggesting the meteorite fell between 1870 and 1440 BC. This Bronze Age date, combined with the parent body having been sufficiently large to produce a fragment with the aluminium²⁶ signature seen in the Mörigen arrowhead, and the fact that it fell in an area known to have been inhabited during the Bronze Age, and therefore would have been observed, makes the Kaalijarv Meteorite the most likely source for the material used to make the arrowhead.
However, this does not rule out other meteorites, such as Bohumilitz or Retuerta de Bullaque, or even an unknown impactor, as sources of the material. The Morasko IAB strewn field in Poland, which has been dated to about 3000 BC and which produced craters up to 90 m in diameter, can be ruled out, as all recovered fragments of this meteorite have much higher levels of germanium (about 500 parts per million) than seen in the Mörigen arrowhead. The Wietrzno Axe and Czestochowa-Rakowa Bracelets are close in time to the Mörigen arrowhead, but have much higher nickel contents, suggesting that they were made with material from a different meteorite.
A search for meteoric iron artefacts near to the Twannberg strewn field produced only a single item, and this was clearly derived from a different meteorite. This suggests that Bronze Age peoples were not aware of the Twannberg Impact, and had no means of detecting and utilizing metal from buried fragments of this object. The artefact uncovered, an iron arrowhead from the Mörigen Pile Dwelling in Bern Canton appears to have been derived from the Kaalijarv Meteorite, which fell in Estonia in about 1500 BC, implying that meteoric iron was a commodity traded across Europe before 800 BC (the approximate age of the Mörigen settlement), with the arrowhead, or the metal from which it was made, apparently having been transported about 1600 km.
Since it is highly unlikely that only a single artefact would have been made from a source such as the Kaalijarv Meteorite once people were aware of it, there is a distinct possibility that other objects made from iron derived from this source are present in archaeological collections elsewhere in Europe, and possibly beyond. While it is possible that larger objects were made from this source, the highly fragmented nature of the material makes it more likely that most artefacts were small, and out current understanding of the ability of Bronze Age people to work iron, also suggests any objects will be very flat, giving a clear set of parameters for searching archaeological collections for more objects.
See also...
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.





.png)





.png)













































