In order to better understand their organization, live cassiosomes were isolated from Cassiopea xamachana mucus. After fixing, dehydrated specimens were examined using scanning electron microscopy. The cassiosome perimeter was found to be lined with nematocyst capsules and numerous long, spiny tubules extruded from abundant O-isorhiza nematocysts in the periphery following spontaneous deployment (likely during the dehydration process). More abundant on the surface, however, were much thinner filaments corresponding to abundant cilia connected to ectodermal cells. Close observation of several cassiosomes via scanning electron microscopy revealed along the outer layer emptied out regions appearing as collapsed cell membrane remnants of deployed nematocysts, underneath which could be seen an amorphous thick central extracellular matrix-like substance. Confocal microscopy on fixed cassiosomes with labeled nuclei, nematocysts and cilia corroborated these findings of an organized cell mass. Cassiosomes are composed of a peripheral layer of nematocytes bearing O-isorhiza nematocysts patterned with presumptive ectoderm cells that lack nematocysts, from which numerous cilia protrude. This outer layer surrounds centralized clusters of Symbiodinium endosymbionts (i.e., hosted by amoebocytes) within an otherwise apparently acellular region.
The term cnidome refers to the dynamic repertoire of nematocyst types in a Cnidarian species. The cnidome, a species-specific trait, often changes throughout the life cycle of the Jellyfish as it undergoes metamorphosis from a sessile Polyp, to strobila, and then to juvenile and sexually mature Medusa. Given reports implicating nematocysts, or tiny little grenades, within
Cassiopea mucus as the cause of stinging water, Ames & Klompen
et al. sought to characterize the cnidome of this species at several life stages, and within the cassiosomes and contents of the mucus.
Cassiopea xamachana discharge assay; mucus only. Mucus concentrated in a petri dish, following manual removal of cassiosomes, subduing and trapping, but not killing, numerous one-day old Artemia nauplii within 60 seconds. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
Nematocyst measurements were plotted for the following life stages of
Cassiopea: Polyps (3); strobilating/released Ephyrae (3) and Medusae, 2.4–8.8 cm in diameter (3); mucus; and cassiosomes (isolated from mucus). Measurements of undischarged nematocysts of each type in the corresponding subsample revealed that O-isorhizas nematocysts are absent in Polyps, but appear in Medusae from the onset of Ephyra development during strobilation. Ames & Klompen
et al. also observed penetrant nematocytes, birhopaloids and euryteles, which cannot be distinguished in the undeployed state (intact) within
Cassiopea tissue using light microscopy. Therefore in this study, these two nematocyst types were analysed together as rhopaloids; hence, rhopaloids account for a larger proportion of the cnidome in the Medusa and mucus than distinct isorhiza types. An assessment of the inventory of nematocysts freely suspended within the mucus yielded a similar nematocyst profile to that of the Medusa, albeit with a proportionately higher number of rhopaloids, which are implicated in envenomation. Conversely, isolated cassiosomes of
Cassiopea contain exclusively O-isorhiza nematocysts which are a ubiquitous type in Jellyfish tentacles, functioning in prey capture and predation.

Nematocyte type proportion (cnidome) varies within different life stages and structures of Cassiopea xamachana. (a) Figure displaying life cycle stages of Cassiopea xamachana and associated cassiosome-laden mucus release by the Medusae. Pie charts indicate proportion of nematocyte types for Polyps (3), Strobila/Ephyrae (3), Medusa (3), mucus (from 4 Medusae), and cassiosomes (from 4 Medusae), based on measurements of multiples of each nematocyst type per life stage. (b), (c) Different nematocyst types isolated from Cassiopea xamachana Medusae oral-arm filaments corresponding to colours in pie charts in (a): a-isorhiza intact (light blue arrow), O-isorhiza intact (green arrows) and deployed (dashed green arrow), and rhopaloid intact (lavender arrow) and deployed (dashed lavender arrow); and Symbidinium (brown arrows). (d) Mucus contents of Cassiopea xamachana containing a triplet of rhopaloid nematocysts (lavender arrows) intact within nematocytes, and Symbiodinium (brown arrow) disassociated from Jellyfish tissue but still within amoebocytes (pink arrows). Scale bars: (b), (d) 10 μm; (c) 20 μm. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
Over a century ago, Henry Farnham Perkins documented that disturbed
Cassiopea xamachana Medusae produced mucus containing ciliated structures as innumerable minute spherical bodies containing unicellular zooxanthellae within the interior, which he considered to be parasitic larvae, and claimed it was 'impossible to regard [these structures] as of Coelenterate [Cnidaria] affinities'. These details suggest that Perkins observed what Ames & Klompen
et al. have identified as cassiosomes, but mistook them for entirely unique, non-Cnidarian organisms. In order to test this theory, and properly classify cassiosomes as belonging to
Cassiopea xamachana, rather than being unknown organism, Ames & Klompen
et al. used real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays to target species specific Cnidarian toxins, employing three custom-designed primer pairs that they designed from the publicly available
Cassiopea xamachana genome.
Cassiosomes are capable of killing Brine Shrimp. (a) Dead 2-day old Artemia nauplii (orange arrow) with cassiosome (green arrow) attached to carapace, imaged within a microfluidic chamber. (b) Cassiosomes (green arrow) lodged into two different 1-day old Artemia nauplii (orange arrow). (c) 1-day old Artemia nauplii (orange arrow), immobilized following cassiosome (green arrow) attachment to the carapace with visibly discharged nematocysts (fuchsia arrows). Scale bars are 200 μm. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
Ames & Klompen
et al. targeted a cnidarian-restricted CrTX/CaTX family toxin
gene in DNA extracted separately from
Cassiopea xamachana Medusa tissue and isolated cassiosomes, and also from tissue of the Moon Jellyfish,
Aurelia sp. (Class Scyphozoa) and a more divergent Jellyfish species, the Sea Wasp,
Alatina alata (Class Cubozoa) for comparison. Amplification of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction gene target was observed for both
Cassiopea xamachana tissue and cassiosome samples using primers for the CrTX/CaTX gene. Conversely, failure to amplify the target in non-
Cassiopea Medusozoans used in this study (despite reports of CrTX/CaTX genes documented in both
Aurelia sp and
Alatina alata validates the specificity of Ames & Klompen
et al.'s primers to a
Cassiopea xamachana -derived gene target, indicating that cassiosomes originate in
Cassiopea Medusae.

Cassiosome organization revealed via scanning electron microscopy. (a) An individual cassiosome poised in a 100-μm mesh opening, revealing the irregular ‘popcorn’ shape of the cassiosome bearing numerous cilia (pink arrows) protruding from the peripheral layer. White rectangles correspond to magnified region shown in (b) and (c). (b), (c) Close up of the cassiosome reveals cilia (pink arrows), and thicker tubules (white arrows) of discharged O-isorhiza nematocyst capsules (blue arrows) in the periphery which is lined with collapsed nematocytes (cyan arrows). Spiny nematocyst tubules (white arrows) are outnumbered by the abundant cilia (thinner filaments) (pink arrows). (d) Depressions fringed by deflated cell membranes outlining nematocytes (cyan arrows in (c) and (d)) following deployment of O-isorhiza nematocysts (blue arrows in (c)) along the cassiosome surface. (e) A different cassiosome from that in (a)–(d). All cellular components were lost (possibly in dehydration stage of preparation) but for discharged O-isorhiza nematocyst capsules (blue arrows) and corresponding spiny tubules (white arrows) in the cassiosome periphery lined with collapsed nematocytes (cyan arrows). White rectangle corresponds to magnified region shown in (f) revealing the dense central, fibrous extra-cellular matrix (green arrow). Unidentified microscopic particles also present (orange arrows). Scale bars as indicated. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
To validate the potential for envenomation by cassiosomes, rather than solely by suspended intact nematocysts in the mucus released by medusae, Ames & Klompen
et al. used LC-MS/MS analyses to confirm the presence of the same CrTX/CaTX toxin proteins in two
Cassiopea xamachana sample types: cassiosomes isolated from mucus released from about 20 Medusae over a 7 hour period, and several vesicular appendages containing cassiosome nests, dissected from multiple Medusae. A shotgun proteomic analysis identified three isoforms of the target toxin family encoded in the
Cassiopea xamachana genome, which Ames & Klompen
et al. call CassTX-A, CassTX-B and CassTX-C. Each toxin protein was identified with multiple unique peptides and a minimum of 17.0% protein coverage, with the exception of CassTX-C, which in the cassiosomes was not assigned with sufficient confidence.

Characterization of cassiosome ultrastructure. (a)–(f) Individual cassiosome fixed and labeled with Tubulin Antibody, ActinGreen™ and NucBlue™, and mounted in 80% glycerol in phosphate buffered saline on glass slides for imaging. Imaging was performed with both differential interference contrast and confocal laser scanning with lines at 405, 488, 561, and 640 nm, and collected with a Plan Apo × 100 objective. (a) Differential interference contrast reveals peripheral layer of nematocytes bearing spherical O-isorhiza nematocysts (lavender arrows). Tubulin (red) reveals cnidocils (short filaments marked by white arrows) extending from apex of nematocytes, and motile cilia (long filaments) originating from non-nematocytes ectoderm cells organized in patches along the peripheral layer among nematocyte-rich areas. NucBlue (blue) reveals nuclei (yellow arrows) of peripheral epithelial layer; nematocytes and other ciliated ectoderm cells. Actin (green) reveals actin basket (pink arrows) formed around the apex of nematocysts. (b) 3-D construction of Z-stack magnified confocal images corresponding to (a) and (c)–(f) shows tubulin (red) of cnidocils (short filaments marked by white arrows) extending from around apex of nematocytes and motile cilia (long filaments) originating from non-nematocytes putative ectoderm cells organized in patches along the peripheral layer among nematocyte-rich areas. NucBlue (blue) reveals nuclei of peripheral epithelial layer; nematocytes and other ciliated ectoderm cells. Actin (green) reveals actin basket forming around the apex of nematocysts. Scale bars are 10 μm. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
A visual inspection of
Cassiopea xamachana oral arms during mucus release revealed that cassiosomes occur as warty clusters within a shallow pocket on the vesicular appendages which are formed of ectoderm, endoderm and mesoglea; the cavity of these appendages communicates with the canals of the oral arms. Vesicular appendages are capable of independent movement, and during feeding of lab-reared
Cassiopeaxamachana Medusae, when
Artemia nauplii approach the oral arms, the vesicular appendage bends to cover the Shrimp, thereby trapping the prey item; this trapping method was also reported in the conspecific
Cassiopea frondosa. Clusters of cassiosomes (i.e., 30–100 individuals) line the surface of the numerous, variably sized vesicular appendages present in
Cassiopea xamachana. In 1900 Henry Bryant Bigelow called these appendages nettle batteries, referring to their functional role in subduing prey, and possibly also in defense.

Characterisation of the ultrastructure of the vesicular appendages during cassiosome production and development in Cassiopea xamachana. Line drawing of vesicular appendage demonstrates how early developing cassiosome protrusions (pro) are connected peripherally to the pocket surface of the vesicular appendage by their shared epithelium (epi vap), whereas fully developed cassiosomes (cass) awaiting deployment are only loosely attached to the pocket and neighboring cassiosomes. (a)–(e) Semithin sections (about 1 μm) of resin-embedded vesicular appendages corresponding to arrows labeled (a)–(e) in the line drawing of the vesicular appendages (va) extending from the oral arms (arm) of the medusae. Clusters of cassiosomes (pink arrows) developing from protrusions (pro) in the epithelium of the concave vesicular appendage pocket (epi vap) give rise to the cassiosome peripheral layer comprising nematocytes bearing O-isorhiza nematocysts (dark spheres stained with 1% toluidine blue) interspersed with other ectodermal cells. Clusters of amoebocytes hosting Symbiodinium (green arrows) move into the cassiosome core at protrusions points. Cassiosome core containing presumptive mesoglea indicated by difference in diffractive index with differential interference contrast. (f) Partial 3-D reconstruction showing protrusions developing from epithelium of the vesicular appendage pocket (epi vap) into popcorn-shaped cassiosomes. Reconstruction based on sections from a different vesicular appendage than seen above but corresponds to the region between sections (a)–(d), revealing the empty core (core) of cassiosomes (cass) (3-D image orientation is vertical with respect to cross sections in the line drawing). Abbreviations: arm, medusa oral arm; cass, cassiosomes(s); core, presumptive mesoglea; pro, protrusion(s); va, vesicular appendage(s); epi vap, epithelial layer of the vesicular appendage pocket. Scale bar is 250 μm. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
Images of semithin sections of five separate vesicular appendages revealed that cassiosomes develop within a depression externally on one side of a vesicular appendage, but occasionally on both sides. During development, cassiosomes originate proximally as protrusions of the epithelium (ectoderm) of the vesicular appendage, and then spread out distally as they develop, incorporating presumptive amoebocytes (endoderm cells that have migrated into the mesoglea), some of which host
Symbiodinium. Early developing cassiosome protrusions are connected peripherally to the pocket surface of the vesicular appendage by their shared ectoderm epithelial layer, whereas fully developed cassiosomes awaiting deployment are only loosely attached to the pocket and neighboring cassiosomes. This development process results in irregular popcornshaped cassiosomes, as shown in the 3-D reconstruction of their organisation within the vesicular appendages, based on semithin images.

Early report of cassiosome nests and detailed documentation in Ames & Klompen et al.'s study. (a), (b) Line drawing of putative cassiosomes being released by Cassiopea frondosa, identified as 'grey bodies' or a 'nematocyst mass' through an apparent opening in the vesicular appendage, modified from Smith, H. G. (1936) Contribution to the anatomy and physiology of Cassiopea frondosa. Tortugas Laboratory of Carnegie Institution of Washington.Volume XXIX. pp 18–52. Abbreviations: g.b., nematocyte mass and op., opening at tip of 'oral vesicles' (i.e., vesicular appendage). (c), (d) Vesicular appendages (green arrows) of Cassiopeaxamachana photographed study lacking aperture (only a groove with no opening occurs at the tip, white arrow). In Cassiopeaxamachana, cassiosomes are shed from loosely organized nests (pink arrows) and released within mucus. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
The peripheral layer (nematocytes and ectoderm) surrounds a central space containing clusters of amoebocytes often hosting
Symbiodinium, randomly interspersed among clear empty patches that exhibit substantially different refractive index properties (as seen in differential interference contrast microscopy) reminiscent of the small bags of mesoglea and nematocysts witnessed being released in the colosely related
Cassiopea frondosa by HG Smith. These findings corroborate those of Ames & Klompen
et al.'s scanning electron microscopy and confocal analyses, and suggest the central region of cassiosomes is amorphous, containing only some loose cells, likely amoebocytes, many of which host
Symbiodinium.

Characterization of the ultrastructure of mature cassiosomes in Cassiopea xamachana. (a) Line drawing, and (b), (c) thin sections of fully developed popcorn-shaped cassiosomes from semithin sections (about 1 μm) of resin-embedded vesicular appendage. Cassiosome peripheral layer comprising nematocytes (cyan arrows) bearing O-isorhiza nematocysts (as peripheral dark spheres stained blue with Richardson’s stain in (b) and (c)) interspersed with patches of oddly shaped ectoderm cells (red arrows), and motile cilia (pink arrows); blue-stained nuclei (yellow arrows) visible below the base of large nematocysts capsule in nematocytes, and also in non-nematocyte ectoderm cells. Cassiosome core containing presumptive mesoglea (gray central region in (a), gray arrow in (b) and (c)), speckled with amoebocytes (purple arrow), hosting Symbiodinium (green arrows) or empty. Rigid stereocillia/cnidocil complex (orange arrows) visible as a point at the nematocyst apical portion, and deployed tubules (black arrows in (a)) on surface present as long, thick spiny threads. Abbreviation: epi vap, epithelial layer of the vesicular appendage pocket. Scale bars are 50 μm. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
Jellyfish of the taxonomic order Rhizostomeae, including
Cassiopea xamachana, all lack marginal tentacles, possessing instead oral arms covered with minute vesicular appendages. Although the main focus of Ames & Klompen
et al.'s study is to provide a detailed description of cassiosomes in
Cassiopea xamachana, in an effort to ascertain if cassiosome production is a possible apomorphy of the Rhizostome Jellyfish clade, they examined the mucus of additional Rhizostome Jellyfish taxa and documented cassiosomes in a total of four Rhizostome Jellyfish lineages (five different species). Cassiosomes from all six species are classified into two main types: motile, bearing cilia that propel them in the water column and nonmotile, bearing no apparent motile cilia. Mucus was directly examined (using light microscopy) from three additional Rhizostomes, the Spotted Jelly,
Mastigias papua, the Floating Bell,
Phyllorhiza punctata, and the Jelly Blubber,
Catostylus mosaicus, as well as a single Semeastomeae (sister group) species, the Moon Jellyfish,
Aurelia sp., all reared at the
National Aquarium in Baltimore, USA. Additionally, Ames & Klompen
et al. obtained a video from the author of the
Jelly Club citizen scientist blog showing abundant motile particles reportedly released by another Rhizostome, the Crown Jellyfish,
Netrostoma setouchianum, collected in Japan. Although Ames & Klompen
et al. were unable to directly examine these cellular masses from
Netrostoma setouchianum, their motility, the irregular shape they possess when released from the oral arms, and the eventual loss of bumpiness and disappearance after several days matches the general description of cassiosomes Ames & Klompen
et al. first discovered in
Cassiopea xamachana. Cassiosomes of
Mastigias papua and
Phyllorhiza punctata Medusae are highly motile, and share the same fundamental structure, albeit exhibiting slight variations with respect to nematocyst types present within the peripheral nematocyte layer of each type. Superficially,
Netrostoma setouchianum cassiosomes appear to match the morphology of the two aforementioned species, however, as Ames & Klompen
et al. were not able to examine them directly using microscopy (solely via video), the presence of associated Dinoflagellates could not be confirmed. Conversely, cassiosomes in
Catostylus mosaicus exhibit several differences in that neither motility nor centralised Symbiodinium were observed but, rather, unidentified Microalgae are distributed homogenously throughout the cell mass. No cassiosomes were found in the mucus of the Semaeostome
Aurelia sp. which lacks both vesicular appendages and endosymbiotic Algae.

Cassiosomes observed in jellyfish species of the order Rhizostomeae: Cladogram of species examined in this study from two orders Rhizostomeae: (a)–(c) Cassiopea xamachana, (d)–(f) Mastigias papua, (g)–(i) Phyllorhiza punctata, (j)–(l) Netrostoma setouchianum, and (m)–(o) Catostylus mosaicus, and (p) Semaeostomeae: Aurelia sp., and their respective cassiosome structures, when present. Abbreviations: iso, isorhiza nematocysts; rhp, rhopaloid nematocysts; *, could not confirm type of nematocysts. Blue symbols: star, motile via cilary movement; hexagon, non-motile; circle, endosymbiotic Dinoflagellates within cassiosomes confirmed; oval, Microalgae on the surface of cassiosomes confirmed; asterix, could not confirm presence or absence of Algal symbioints; X, no cassiosomes witnessed within the mucus.Scale bar: (a) 1.5 cm; (d), (g), (j), (m), (p) 2.5 cm; (b), (e), (h), (k), (n), (o) 300 μm; (c), (i), (l) 200 μm; (f), (o) 100 μm. Ames & Klompen et al. (2020).
Jellyfish are remarkable aquatic animals that diverged over 600 million years ago and have in spite of, or possibly because of, their diploblastic nature, evolved a remarkable envenomation system in the form of stinging cells, nematocytes, for prey capture and defense. Ames & Klompen
et al. report the findings of an extensive investigation into the provenance, development and ultrastructure of cassiosomes, a newly described cnidarian stinging-cell structure. Based on these findings, they hypothesise that cassiosomes evolved within a single lineage of Jellyfish, Rhizostomeae, to further weaponise the Jellyfish by sequestering nematocytes (and other cells) into grenade-like structures that are freely released into the water within exuded mucus. Ames & Klompen
et al.'s findings strongly implicate cassiosomes as a major contributor to the stinging water phenomenon reported by sea bathers and aquarists when interacting with Rhizostome Jellyfish species.
Ames & Klompen
et al. used extensive microscopy techniques, video-documentation and microfluidics to describe these cnidarian innovations first in
Cassiopea xamachana, and then in taxa belonging to four additional Rhizostomeae Jellyfish families. Their preliminary findings suggest there are motile and non-motile types of cassiosomes among the Rhizostomes they examined in this study, and that some host endosymbiotic Algae Symbiodinium while at least one bears Microalgae instead. However, the fundamental trait distinguishing cassiosomes from nematosomes, analogous cell masses deriving from the mesenteries of the Sea Anemone
Nematostella, is that the structure of cassiosomes is organized into a distinct outer epithelial layer surrounding a central, mostly empty, core. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of these photosynthetic endosymbionts in cassiosomes. The complete absence of cassiosomes in the mucus released by the Semeastome
Aurelia sp. supports Ames & Klompen
et al.'s theory that cassiosomes are a Rhizostome evolutionary novelty. However, a comparative examination of the mucus contents across all Rhizostome lineages, including the eight nominal
Cassiopea species is needed to test this hypothesis.
Furthermore, Ames & Klompen
et al. identified the provenance of cassiosome production and release from oral arm vesicular appendages, corroborating earlier works suggesting these vesicles (as oral vesicles) function in defense and predation. These previous works noted similar structures in the oral vesicles of
Cassiopea species, dubbed either gray bodies, bags of nematocysts and mucous cells, minute spherical bodies, or grenades, that shot when contacted. Although those reports fell short of providing an adequate description, Ames & Klompen
et al. are confident that the structures mentioned therein correspond to what they described as cassiosomes. The mechanism of cassiosome deployment may vary across different Rhizostome taxa, or even between closely related species, as according to Horace Smith, when prey was provided to
Cassiopea frondosa, an aperture opened at the tip of the vesicular appendages releasing gray bodies (putative cassiosomes). Conversely, in Ames & Klompen
et al.'s study on
Cassiopea xamachana, upon disturbance, cassiosomes spontaneously detached from the surface of vesicular appendage pockets, which lack a terminal aperture.
All Jellyfish have envenomation capabilities due to bioactive proteins comprising the venom cocktail of the cnidome (i.e., repertoire of nematocysts types). The Cnidarian-specific poreforming CrTX/CaTX toxin family is one of the most potent toxin groups, and represents the main proteinaceous component of the venom of Cubozoans (Box Jellyfish), a clade that includes species whose sting results in a deadly cardiovascular condition. In Ames & Klompen
et al.'s study, the presence of
Cassiopea xamachana-specific CrTX/CaTX toxin family homologs was confirmed in cassiosomes at the DNA and protein level (i.e., CassTX), validating their expression in cassiosomes and their contribution to the stinging water phenomenon.
Although
Cassiopea xamachana in Florida waters is considered a mild stinger, reports exist of painful Human envenomation resulting in rash, vomiting, painful joints, swelling and irritation for this broadly distributed species, in addition to documentation of hemolytic and cytolytic activity in crude venom of
Cassiopea xamachana and close relatives. Following a characterisation of the cnidome in
Cassiopea xamachana in this study, Ames & Klompen
et al. discovered a large proportion of undeployed penetrant rhopaloid nematocysts in released mucus. These findings suggest that the toxic mucus phenomenon is due to the combined effect of cassiosomes and free, undeployed nematocysts.
Overall, the topic of Jellyfish mucus is an understudied field, despite the ecological importance of mucus in antimicrobial and environmental stress protection and chemical defense, relevance of toxic bioactive compounds found within venom, and the potential importance to non-Cnidarian taxa. Given the recent publication of the first reference genome for
Cassiopea xamachana, a thorough investigation into the molecular pathways underlying the development and release of cassiosomes and comparisons with nematocyst-enriched structures in other Cnidarians (e.g., nematosomes, acontia and acrorhagi) can now be undertaken.
See also...