Showing posts with label Artiodactyls. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Artiodactyls. Show all posts

Tuesday, 29 August 2023

Archaeologists uncover ritually buried Red Deer from Bronze Age England.

Archaeologists carrying out exploratory work ahead of the construction of a new water supply network in the east of England have uncovered what appears to be a pair of ritually buried Red Deer at Navenby in Lincolnshire, according to a press release issued by Anglian Water on 9 August 2023. The Deer, which are thought to have been buried about 4000 years ago, were accompanied by pottery associated with the Bell Beaker Culture, a Bronze Age European Culture with appeared about 4800 years ago in Iberia, and spread across Europe and parts of North Africa, reaching Britain about 4450 years ago. The Deer show no signs of butchery (the removal of meat for consumption, which leaves cut marks upon the bones), and were therefore presumably intact when buried, although it is possible that they were ritually sacrificed for some purpose.

Remnants of two Red Deer found in a Bronze Age burrial at Navenby in Lincolnshire, England. Anglian Water.

Other than the burred Deer, no further traces of Bronze Age activity were found at Navenby, although the archaeologists did uncover a small Iron Age settlement, comprising two roundhouses and five smaller structures, which may have been grain stores, as well as the burial of three cremated and one uncremated individuals, which may date from the Roman period.

See also...

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.


Saturday, 5 August 2023

Perucetus colossus: A Basilosauridae Whale from the Eocene of Peru, which may have had a mass exceding that of the modern Blue Whale.

The fossil record of the Cetacea gives us one of the most remarkable examples of an evolutionary transition in a group of organisms, from small, Mouse Deer-like, and entirely terrestrial, Artiodactyls to the largest Animals ever to have lived in out oceans. The early marine Whales developed specialisms for life in the water during one of the Earth's most extreme greenhouse phases, quickly growing in body size, and by the end of the Eocene becoming extremely elongate as well. However, the extreme gigantism seen in modern Whales is a apparently a relatively recent development which appeared in Baleen Whales in the cooling oceans of the Late Cainozoic. One of these, the extant Blue Whale, Balaenoptera musculus, is currently considered to be the heaviest Animal ever to have lived on Earth. This trend in developing large body-size as a development to active pelagic swimming is not unique in Cetaceans, among Tetrapods it can be observed in several clades of Mesozoic Marine Reptiles, such as the Ichthyosaurs.

As Animals make the transition from living in a terrestrial one to living in a marine one, buoyancy control becomes a key aspect of their biology. In Vertebrates, bone is the densest tissue, and large amounts of this tissue are present in the bodies of most Vertebrates. This has resulted in a variety of specialist bone-adaptations appearing in Tetrapods that have returned to an aquatic lifestyle. In Animals with a slow-moving, shallow-diving lifestyle, such as Sirenians, this typically manifests as an increase in bone mass. This increase has been observed in the earliest Whales, and is seen in many Basilosaurids (an extinct Cetacean family which was the most numerous and widespread Whale group in the Eocene). The reverse situation is seen in more active, pelagic swimming marine Tetrapods, including all modern Whales, with bone mass becoming severely reduced, and other tissues taking on a greater role in providing structural support to the body. The Basilosaurids were a unique group, growing to lengths of up to 20 m and having a much higher relative bone mass than modern Whales, although, this has not until now been shown to be close to that of the extant Sirenians.

In a paper published in the journal Nature on 2 August 2023, Giovanni Bianucci of the Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra at the Università di Pisa, Olivier Lambert of the Direction Opérationnelle Terre et Histoire de la Vie at the Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Mario Urbina of the Departamento de Paleontología de Vertebrados at the Museo de Historia Natural of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San MarcosMarco Merella and Alberto Collareta, also of the Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra at the Università di Pisa, Rebecca Bennion, also of the Direction Opérationnelle Terre et Histoire de la Vie at the Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, and of the Evolution & Diversity Dynamics Lab at the Universite de Liege, Rodolfo Salas-Gismondi, also of the Departamento de Paleontología de Vertebrados at the Museo de Historia Natural of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos and of the Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofía and Centro de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral y Sostenible at the Universitad Peruana Cayetano Heredia LimaAldo Benites-Palomino, again of the Departamento de Paleontología de Vertebrados at the Museo de Historia Natural-Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, and of the Department of Paleontology at the University of Zurich, Klaas Post of the Natuurhistorisch Museum Rotterdam, Christian de Muizon of the Département Origines et Évolution at the Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleGiulia Bosio of the Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Ambiente e della Terra at the Università degli Studi diMilano-Bicocca, Claudio Di Celma of the School of Science and Technology at the University of CamerinoElisa Malinverno, also of the Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Ambiente e della Terra at the Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Pietro Paolo Pierantoni, also of the School of Science and Technology at the University of Camerino, Igor Maria Villa of the Institut für Geologie at the Universität Bern, and  Eli Amson of the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, describe a new species of Basilosaurid Whale from the Late Eocene Paracas Formation of Peru, which combines a gigantic size with the highest degree of bone mass increase ever seen in a Whale, which was potentially heavier than the living Blue Whale.

The new species is described from a single specimen, MUSM 3248, which was recovered from the upper part of the Yumaque Member of the Paracas Formation exposed in the Ica valley a few kilometres south of the Zamaca locality, and is now housed in the collection of the Museo de Historia Natural of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. This was five metres below a tephra layer radioisotope dated to 36.8 million years ago. Based upon this, and biostratigraphic data from the silts of the Yumaque Member, the specimen is estimated to be between 39.8 and 37.84 million years old, making it Bartonian, or Middle Eocene in age. The species is named Perucetus colossus, where 'Perucetus' means 'Peru Whale' and 'colossus' means gigantic.

Location and stratigraphic position of Perucetus colossus MUSM 3248. (a) Map showing the position of the Coastal Batholith and major trench-parallel structural highs along the coast of Peru. (b) Stratigraphic column of the Cainozoic succession exposed in the East Pisco Basin. (c) Measured stratigraphic section of the type locality of Perucetus colossus, indicating the stratigraphic height of the holotype MUSM 3248, the dated tephra layer, and the identified bioevents. Bianucci et al. (2023).

The specimen comprises a partial skeleton including 13 vertebrae (two tentatively referred to the last thoracics and the others to the anterior lumbars), four ribs and right innominate lacking the distal portion of the ilium. It is believed to have been nearing skeletal maturity when it died. 

Perucetus colossus differs from all other known Cetaceans in the extremely pachyosteosclerotic (thick and dense) nature of the bones of its post-cranial skeleton. Pachyosteosclerosis has been reported in Cetaceans before, and is a defining feature of the Basilosaurid Subfamily Pachycetinae, but never to the extent seen in Perucetus colossus

Partial skeleton of the Perucetus colossus MUSM 3248 holotype. (a) Schematic body and skeletal reconstruction reporting the preserved bones (red). (b), (c) Right rib in anterior (b) and lateral (c) views. (d)–(f) Right innominate in medial (d), dorsal (e) and lateral (f) views. (g)–(i) Last preserved lumbar vertebra in anterior (g), left lateral (h) and dorsal (i) views. (j)–(l) Articulated sequence of the 13 collected vertebrae in dorsal (j), ventral (k) and right lateral (l) views. Scale bars, 50 cm (b), (c) and (g)–(l) and 10 cm (d)–(f). All of the images were generated from 3D surface models. Bianucci et al. (2023).

Although heavily modified by the presence of additional dense bone material, the transverse processes of the vertebrae are sufficiently similar to those of other Basinosaurids for Biannucci et al. to be confident about their placement as the two thoracic and the first eleven lumbar vertebrae. About half the vertebrae are missing their centrum epiphyses, a sign that these bones were not fused at the time of death. In a terrestrial Mammal, this would be taken as a sign of immaturity, but in Whales this condition frequently persists into adult life, and is therefore considered to be of no significance for determining the age of the specimen. 

One of the vertebrae of Perucetus colossus being moved during the recovery of the specimen. Universitad Peruana Cayetano Heredia Lima.

The best preserved rib displays a simple proximal end without distinct tuberculum and capitulum and a weak overall curvature in anterior or posterior view, which is consistent with a placement in the posterior region of the rib cage. Since pachyosteosclerosis of the ribs tends to develop in the foremost ribs first, this is consistent with the entire rib cage being pachyosteosclerotic.

Specimen MUSM 3248, shows no signs of having been pathological in any way (pathological pachyosteosclerosis tends to produce highly variable bone density distribution), but rather appears to have been a healthy specimen of a species with a highly pachyosteosclerotic skeleton. The apophyses of the vertebrae are distinctive in having a 'bloated' appearance, unlike that of any other Mammal, whereas in all other Cetaceans, including the largest Balaenopterids and Balaenids, the vertebral apophyses tend to be relatively thin.

Pachyostosis in the Perucetus colossus MUSM 3248 holotype. (a)–(c) Skeleton (a) preserved bones in dark grey, life reconstruction (b), and 3D models of a rib (c) and lumbar vertebra (d) of Perucetus colossus. (e)–(j) Skeletons (e), (h), posterior rib (f), (i) and last lumbar vertebra (g), (j) of the Wexford Blue Whale, Balaenoptera musculus; (e)–(g) and another Basilosaurid, Cynthiacetus peruvianus (h)–(j). Scale bars, 50 cm for isolated bones in (c), (d), (f), (g), (i) and (j) and 2 m for the skeletons and reconstruction in (a), (b), (e) and (h). The dagger symbols (†) indicate extinct species. Bianucci et al. (2023).

The ribs which were found were also highly pachyosteosclerotic, leading Bianucci et al. to conclude that this state would have applied to the whole skeleton. If this was the case, then the volume of the entire skeleton would have been 2.9-4.1 m², and would have weighed 5.3 to 7.6 tonnes, which is 2.0–2.9 times as much as that of a 25 m long Blue Whale.

The total range of skeletal masses found in Tetrapods varys between about 26 mg in the Dwarf Chameleon Brookesia nana, and an estimated 9.9 tonnes in the giant Titanosaur, Argentinosaurus huinculensis. Modern Cetaceans have relatively light skeletons, compared to the rest of their tissues, perhaps making up 2.2-5.1% of their entire body mass, while that of terrestrial Mammals varies between 4 and 10%. The skeletons of Sirenians, aquatic Mammals with a lifestyle similar to that presumed for pachyosteosclerotic Basilosaurs such as Perucetus colossus. tend to have skeleton-mass-to-body-mass ratios similar to that of terrestrial Mammals. 

Estimating the body mass of extinct Animals such as Basilosaurs is complicated, and in the case of Perucetus colossus is made more challenging by the extreme skeletal morphology. It is likely that the heavy skeleton would have been counterbalanced by a large volume of buoyant blubber, which would have had a strong impact on the overall density and mass of the soft tissue of the living Whale. If it is assumed that Perucetus colossus has a skeleton-mass-to-body-mass ratio similar to that of modern Sirenians, then the living Animal would have had a total mass of about 85 tonnes, but if the ratio was comparable to that of living Whales, then it would have been between about 180 and 340 tonnes. Adult Blue Whales typically have a total body mass of about 130-150 tonnes, so it is possible that Perucetus colossus was more massive than a Blue Whale.

Scaling of the skeletal mass across Amniotes’ body mass range. Regressions based on extant terrestrial Mammals (grey line) and extant Cetaceans (blue line). The estimated values for extreme terrestrial Amniotes, Sirenians (either measured or estimated) as well as the results of the estimations for Perucetus colossus are also shown. Each data point corresponds to a distinct species (specific mean for the largest extant cetaceans, Balaenoptera musculus and Physeter macrocephalus), except for extant sirenians (represented by two species). The horizontal and vertical bars indicate the maximum and minimum estimates (some are too small to be visible). Scales are logarithmic. Human height, 1.8 m (scale for larger silhouettes); penny diameter, 2 cm. Bianucci et al. (2023).

Among Tetrapods, high levels of pachyosteosclerosis are only known in fully aquatic species capable of bearing young in the water. The morphology of Perucetus colossus makes it highly unlikely that it was ever able to pull itself onto land for any reason, and therefore it is presumed to have given birth at sea. Its presumed morphology and high level of pachyosteosclerosis make it likely that it lived in shallow waters, such as those inhabited by living Manatees, although the large mass of the Animal may have made it more resilient to wave actions, something which has also been proposed for the more recently extinct t Steller’s Sea Cow, Hydrodamalis gigas. Coastal habitats have previously been proposed for Basilosaurids, based upon their skeletal anatomies and stable isotope data.

 
Reconstruction of Perucetus colossus in its coastal habitat. Because portions of the skeleton are unknown, several aspects of the reconstruction are tentative: the overall proportions of the axial postcranium are based on a close relative Cynthiacetus peruvianus, which was scaled-up and dilated according to the elements recovered for Perucetus colossus; the skull and limbs were only scaled-up; the tail fluke and forelimb use (bottom-walking) are based on the Manatee, Trichechus, sp, the extant Marine Mammal with the closest degree of pachyosteosclerosis in the postcranial skeleton; the hind limb of Perucetus colossus was not recovered, but the anatomy of its innominate indicates the presence of a reduced, articulated leg. The associated Sawfish, Pristis sp., was recovered from the same unit in the East Pisco Basin, the Yumaque Member of the Paracas Formation. Alberto Gennari in Bianucci et al. (2023).

Although Perucetus colossus is known only from a single fragmentary skeleton, lacking a head or any teeth (which would be needed to make any assumption about its diet or feeding habits), some conclusions can be made about the way in which it lived. The vertebrae of Perucetus colossus have elongated centra, something also found in other Basilosaurids, as well as in living Manatees, Trichechus spp., where it is associated with swimming by means of axial undulation. Interestingly, another living Sirenian, the Dugong, Dugong dugon, which lives in more open waters and swims in a similar way to living Whales, by oscillation of a lunate tail, lacks such elongate centra. 

A previous study examined motion in another Basilosaurid, Cynthiacetus peruvianus, providing a methodology to analyse the movement of Perucetus colossus. Doing this showed that dorsal and lateral flexation was extremely limited in Perucetus colossus, but that its capacity for ventral flexation was actually higher than in Cynthiacetus peruvianus, suggesting that swimming was driven entirely by downward strokes of the posterior part of the body. Such a form of motion has also been proposed for early Whales Antaecetus and Pachycetus, and would have been particularly useful for pushing the Animal away from the seafloor suddenly; in the smaller Whales it has been suggested that this might have indicated they were Ambush predators, but this seems unlikely for an Animal as large as Perucetus colossus; instead a strong upward swimming capacity might have been needed to help it breath. 

Estimates of the osteological range of motion. Extension and flexion of the preserved portion of vertebral column of Perucetus colossus holotype (MUSM 3248) is compared with an equivalent vertebral column portion of Cynthiacetus peruvianus holotype (MNHN.F.PRU10) using the respective 3D models. Intervertebral spaces were reconstructed based on the Common Dolphin, Delphinus delphis. Scale bar is 50 cm. Bianucci et al. (2023).

The large size and undulatory motion of early Whales such as Perucetus colossus and Basilosaurus spp., is similar to that seen in the large Ichthyosaurs of the Early Triassic. In these Marine Reptiles it has been suggested that their large size might have helped to compensate for the high energetic cost of undulatory locomotion. It has also been observed that the earliest members of several Mesozoic Marine Reptile groups shared a small size (less than 1 m), pachyosteosclerotic skeleton, and serpentiform body adapted for undulatory motion, suggesting that all these Animals were the subjects of similar selective pressures, associated with shallow diving in a coastal environment. Having adopted such a lifestyle, all would then have been under further selective pressure to grow in size, allowing longer and deeper dives.

While the absence of a skull makes it impossible to accurately reconstruct the feeding habits of Perucetus colossus, its large size and a body apparently adapted to slow swimming and diving in near-shore environments, do make some speculation possible. Such a large Animal must have required very large quantities of food, and therefore that food must have been fairly abundant. Perucetus colossus has been observed to share a number of features with extant Sirenians, a group which feeds almost exclusively on Seagrass and Macroalgae, but no other Cetacean has ever been recorded to follow a herbivorous lifestyle, so this seems a little unlikely. An alternative might be sessile or sedentary benthic Animals such as Crustaceans, demersal Fish, and Molluscs. Such organisms could be harvested with a sucking and/or filter feeding technique, similar to that used by the living Grey Whale, Eschrichtius robustus, or possibly to have fed on sunken carrion, in a way similar to many large, bottom-dwelling Sharks.

The discovery of Perucetus colossus extends the range of known skeletal phenotypes for Vertebrates, and our understanding of the maximum achievable body mass for a healthy Animal. It further shows that masses close to or exceeding 100 tonnes are not a recent phenomenon in Cetaceans, as has previously been assumed, but had also been achieved by the second half of the Eocene; a time during which the maximum size was also achieved by several other Mammal groups. While the remains of the only known specimen of Perucetus colossus are fragmentary, preventing a full reconstruction of the living Animal and its lifestyle, it appears to have been adapted for a slow-swimming, most likely coastal, benthic habit, showing that a fully pelagic lifestyle is not necesarily a prerequisite for achieving large size in Cetaceans. It further expands the known ecological niche of the Basilosaurids, but supports the hypothesis that this group was essentially restricted to coastal environments, which are known to have been highly productive during the Eocene.

See also...


Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.


Friday, 25 October 2019

Musk Deer from the Miocene of Mongolia.

Musk Deer, Moschidae, are small Artiodactyls closely related to True Deer, Cervidae, but differing from them in the absence of antlers; instead the males have enlarged, tusk-like canine teeth which are used in conflict with other males. Musk Deer also lack the facial glands of True Deer, instead the males have a musk gland in their genital area. Unfortunately this musk gland is highly prised in the perfume industry and Chinese medicine, with the effect that six of the seven extant species of Musk Deer are now classified as Endangered under the terms of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species, with the remaing species being classed as Vulnerable. All extant species of Musk Deer are placed in a single genus, Moschus, found within wooded areas of Asia. The group is represented by twenty seven fossil species, split into fourteen genera, dating from the Miocene onwards, with the oldest known specimens coming from Serbian strata dated to about 17 million years ago. However, almost all known fossil specimens assigned to the group are from Europe, with fossil Musk Deer only reported from two Miocenesites in China, Silong in  Jiangsu Province, and Damiao in Hebei, with the Sihong specimens being lost.

In a paper published in the journal Palaeontologica Electronica in August 2019, Bastien Mennecart of the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien and the Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Manuela Aiglstorfer of the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, and Ursula Göhlich and Gudrun Daxner-Höck, also of the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, describe a serious of isolated Musk Deer teeth from Loh Formation at the Miocene Ulan Tolgoi locality in the Valley of Lakes Region of Mongolia.

The locality Ulan Tolgoi is situated in the northeast of the Taatsiin Tsagaan Nuur Basin, which is part of the Valley of Lakes in Central Mongolia. From bottom to top, the basin is filled with Mesozoic and Cenozoic continental sediments. From 1995 to 2012, the Mongolian Academy of Sciences and the Natural History Museum of Vienna carried out an extensive program of field work in Oligocene and Miocene deposits of the Valley of Lakes region in Mongolia. This project’s output included several scientific publications, the identification of about 19 000 fossils, the description of 175 fossil Mammal species (including 32 newly erected species), and the first precise integrated stratigraphy of the Mongolian Oligocene and Miocene combining biostratigraphy and radiometric dating. 

Geographic position (1) of Mongolia (black) in Asia (light grey) and (2) of the Ulan Tolgoi locality (black square). (3) Photo of the Ulan Tolgoi locality taken by Gudrun Daxner-Höck during fieldwork in August 2015. Mennecart et al. (2019).

A 50 m thick sediment sequence of the Loh Formation is exposed along a southwest to northeast striking ridge at Ulan Tolgoi. From bottom to top, the beds are: (1) reddish-brown sandy siltstone, followed by (2) whitish-grey sandstone and siltstone with gravel lenses (scattered bones included). The sandy whitish part is locally covered by (3) a reddish-brown silty claystone, followed by (4) a rose-grey siltstone layer Towards the top of the sequence (5) brown silt, and (6) quaternary gravels follow.

The age of the Ulan Tolgoi fauna can only be inferred from biostratigraphic data, because no Miocene basalt is exposed in this region, and no magnetostratigraphic data are available so far. Comparisons of the Ulan Tolgoi fauna to Mammals from early and middle Miocene faunas from Inner Mongolia in China show that most genera listed from Ulan Tolgoi have their lowermost occurrences in the early Miocene and beginning of the middle Miocene.

The Ulan Tolgoi fossil collection is composed of small and large Mammals. Small Mammals were selected from three screen washed samples, and scattered large Mammal remains were collected from surface in the vicinity of the sample places. Though the fauna comprises 21 genera, though species identification is almost impossible, because the taxa are represented by only one or a few specimens.

Very few Ruminant species and specimens were described from the Ulan Tolgoi Miocene deposits during the course of the project, with those that were assigned to the genera Eotragus (a Bovid) and Lagomeryx (a member of the Lagomerycidae, or Rabbit Deer, an extinct group that may have been ancestral to both the True Deer and Musk Deer). 

The first specimen discussed by Mennecart et al. is a right lower second premolar with preserved roots, measuring 5.8 x 2.9 mm. The enamel of this specimen is slightly pleated on the lingual side (inner side, literallty the side towards the tongue). The anterior conid (front cust of a lower premolar) is located anteromedian (in front of the midline), forming a pointed anterior part of the tooth. The straight anterolabial cristid (front outside ridge) starts from the apex of the mesolabial conid (outside middle cusp) and joins the anterior conid (back cusp) on its posterolabial (outside back) side. The anterior conid is low and does not form any labial relief. The large mesolabial conid is the highest cuspid. It is located central and median. It possesses a broad posterior part. Since the posteriolingual conid is labiolingually oriented, it forms a narrow and deep posterior valley. The posterolingual conid is long, reaching to the lingual side of the tooth, forming a small protrusion. On its labial face (outside, towards the lips), we can observe a vertical depression. The posterolabial cristid (boack outside ridge), reaching from the mesolabial conid apex to the labial part of the posterolingual conid, is curved. The posterolabial conid (back outside cusp) is quite distinct. It forms the posterolabial corner of the tooth. As there is no posterior stylid (ridge running vertically down the middle of the tooth), the back valley is widely open. The posterolingual conid (back inside cusp) is higher than the anterior conid. There is no cingulid (ridge that runs around the base of the crown of a lower tooth).

Right lower second premolar from the Ulan Tolgoi Miocene deposits in labial (7), occlusal (8), and lingual (9) views. Mennecart et al. (2019).

The second specimen described is a fourth lower premolar with preserved roots measuring 8.6 x 4.9 mm,  which was formerly assigned to Lagomeryx, but which they consider to be an indeterminated Musk Deer. This specimen is a little worn, high crowned, and the enamel is slightly wrinkled. There is a short anterolabial cingulid (ridge running around the front and exterior surfaces) and a vestigial anterolingual cingulid (ridge running around the back and interior surfaces). The mesolabial conid (medium outside cusp) is located median (in the middle). It is smaller than the mesolingual conid (middle inside cusp). The latter is slightly shifted to anterior (front) and is laterally compressed (flattened sideways). It is the highest conid. The very deep anterior valley is closed by the connection of the anterolingual cristid (front inside ridge) and an enlarged anterior conid (front cusp). The anterior conid shows an additional minute anterior bifurcation. The anterior stylid (central ridge) forms the anterolingual (front inside) edge of the tooth. The oblique transverse cristid (diagonal ridge crossing the tooth) fuses with the posterior end of the posterolingual cristid (back inside ridge) building the posterior wall of the anterior valley. Transverse cristid and posterolingual conid (inside back cusp) are oriented parallel, as are posterior and back valley. The valleys are both deep and oriented obliquely. The posterior valley is open lingually. The posterior cristid turns posteriorly at the base and almost reaches the posterolingual edge of the tooth closing the back valley basally. The posterolabial cristid is very short, and the posterolabial conid is well-marked. There is a distinct labial depression anterior to it. The posterior stylid (back central ridge) is very weak. The posterior interdental contact surface implies that the fourth premolar was considerably intruded by the first premolar.

Right fourth premolar from the Ulan Tolgoi Miocene deposits in labial (4), occlusal (5), and lingual (6) views. Mennecart et al. (2019).

The next specimen is a medium-sized molar has a fully developed The medium-sized molar has a fully developed selenodonty (form suited to herbivory, with a low crown and cresent-shaped cusps). The enamel is slightly wrinkled. The lingual side of the tooth is flattened. The conids (cusps) are not fully aligned, comprising an intermediate situation between the condition of Bovids and Cervids/Palaeomerycids, as observed in some Moschid taxa. All cristids (ridges) are more or less straight. The preprotocristid and prehypocristid (front ridges) are parallel and oriented obliquely to the main axis of the tooth. The same applies to internal postprotocristid and posthypocristid (back ridges). The prehypocristid is lower and terminates in the posterior wall of the internal postprotocristid. It does not meet the connection between internal postprotocristid, preentocristid, and postmetacristid. A well-developed, long and  slender, external postprotocristid starting from the apex of the protoconid forms a deep 'Palaeomeryx fold'. The metastylid is weak and the entostylid is absent. Postentocristid and posthypocristid are fused and close the posterior wall. The ectostylid is very well-developed. The anterior cingulid is weakly developed. Due to the strong 'Palaeomeryx fold' and the still marked anterior cingulid, Mennecart et al. consider the tooth to be a first.

First molar from the Ulan Tolgoi Miocene deposits in labial (1), occlusal (2), and lingual (3) views. Mennecart et al. (2019).

The final specimen is a right third molar measuring 11.1 x 5.4 mm, formerly identified as Lagomeryx sp., but considered to be assignable to the genus Micromeryx and probably the species Micromeryx primaevus, a species previously described from the Miocene of Europe and China. The specimen is selenodont. The enamel is slightly wrinkled. The lingual wall is more bulgy than in the first molar, and the lingual cuspids are less aligned. The and the lingual cuspids are less aligned. The metastylid (ridge in front of the middle cusp) is very strong. The prehypocristid nearly meets the connection between internal postprotocristid, preentocristid, and postmetacristid. A well-developed, long, and bulky external postprotocristid, starting from the apex of the protoconid, forms a deep 'Palaeomeryx fold' with the internal one. There is a quite distinct entostylid (inside ridge) sitting lingual on the developed entoconulid (on the toungeward side of the inside cusp). The preentoconulidcristid connects the posthypocristid and the entostylid. The back fossa (depression) of the molar is oblique. The selenodont and quite large hypoconulid forms the posterolabial corner of the molar. The ectostylid and the posterior ectostylid are very well developed. The anterior metastylid is weakly developed.is very strong. The prehypocristid nearly meets the connection between internal postprotocristid, preentocristid, and postmetacristid. A well-developed, long, and bulky external postprotocristid, starting from the apex of the protoconid, forms a deep 'Palaeomeryx fold' with the internal one. There is a quite distinct entostylid sitting lingual on the developed entoconulid. The preentoconulidcristid connects the posthypocristid and the entostylid. The back fossa of the mollar is oblique. The selenodont and quite large hypoconulid forms the posterolabial corner of the molar. The ectostylid and the posterior ectostylid are very well developed. The anterior cingulid is weakly developed.

Micromeryx. cf. primaevus: left third molar fromthe Ulan Tolgoi Miocene deposits in labial (10), occlusal (11), and lingual (12) views. Scale bar is 10 mm. (13) dental nomenclature of the lower molar: Ci, anterior cingulid; Ec, ectostylid; En, entoconid; End, entoconulid; Hy, hypoconid; Hyd, hypoconulid; Me, metaconid; Med, metastylid; PF, “Palaeomeryx fold”; Pr, protoconid. (14) dental nomenclature of the lower premolar: AC, anterior conid; AS, anterior stylid; MaC, mesolabial conid; Mic, mesolingual conid; PaC, posterolabial conid; PiC, posterolingual conid; PS, posterior stylid; TC, transverse cristid. Mennecart et al. (2019).

See also...

https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2019/07/charging-bison-injures-nine-year-old.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2019/06/muntiacus-gigas-new-specimen-of-giant.html
https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2018/03/giraffe-tracks-from-late-pleistocene-of.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2016/08/lightning-kills-323-reindeer-in.html
https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2016/01/ammotragus-lervia-diet-of-barbary-sheep.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2015/12/capreolus-constantini-roe-deer-from.html
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.