Nineteen cases of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus infection reported in 2025.

Nineteen cases of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus infection have been reported in 2025 till 21 December, according to a press release issued by the World Health Organization on 24 December. Seventeen of these cases have been reported from Saudi Arabia, and two from France. There have been two fatalities attributed to the disease this year, both in Saudi Arabia. Both cases reported in France were individuals who had recently returned from the Arabian Peninsula. 

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus was first reported in Jordan in 2012, since when there have been 2635 cases reported from 27 countries in all six of the World Heath Organization's regions (Africa, the Americas, Southeast Asia, Europe, the Eastern Mediterranean, and the Western Pacific), with 964 associated fatalities (a case fatality ratio of 37%). However, 84% of these countries (2224 individual infections) have been reported from a single country, Saudi Arabia.

The epidemic curve of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus infections (2635) and deaths (964) reported globally between 2012 and 2025. World Health Organization.

Of the seventeen cases of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus infection reported in 2025, ten were reported in Riyadh Province, three from the city of Tiaf, two from Najran Province, one from Hail Province, and one from the city of Hafr Al-Batin. Details of the French cases, other than that they occurred in individuals who had recently returned from the Arabian Peninsula, are not available.

Geographical distribution of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus infections between 1 January and 21 December 2025. World Health Organization.

Both of the infections reported in France were in the month of December and are still under investigation. These cases bring the total number of reported cases in France to four, with two previous cases in 2013, also in individuals who had recently returned from the Arabian Peninsula.

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome is a viral respiratory infection caused by the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus, a form of positive sense single-strand RNA Virus. Approximately 36% of patients with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome have died, though this may be an overestimate of the true mortality rate, as mild cases of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus may be missed by existing surveillance systems, and the case fatality ratio is calculated based only on laboratory-confirmed cases.

Structure and genomic organisation of a Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Viron. Bleibtreu et al. (2020). 

Humans are infected with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus from direct or indirect contact with Dromedary Camels, which are the natural host and zoonotic source of the Virus. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus has demonstrated the ability to transmit between Humans. So far, non-sustained Human-to-Human transmission has occurred among close contacts and in healthcare settings and outside of the healthcare setting, there has been limited Human-to-Human transmission.

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus infections range from showing no symptoms (asymptomatic) or mild respiratory symptoms, to severe acute respiratory disease and death. A typical presentation of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome disease is fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Pneumonia is a common finding, but not always present. Gastrointestinal symptoms, including diarrhoea, have also been reported. Severe illness can cause respiratory failure that requires mechanical ventilation and support in an intensive care unit. The virus appears to cause more severe disease in older people, persons with weakened immune systems, and those with co-morbidities or chronic diseases such as renal disease, cancer, chronic lung disease, and diabetes.

No vaccine or specific treatment is currently available, although several Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-specific vaccines and therapeutics are in development. Treatment is supportive and based on the patient’s clinical condition and symptoms.

See also...

Malformations in Trilobites from the Silurian and Devonian of Europe.

Malformations in fossils, such as pathologies caused by infections, scars left by recovered injuries, or teratologies caused by developmental problems, can tell us a lot about how extinct organisms grew and interacted with their environments, although when analysing these is clearly preferable to have access to non-malformed examples of the same species, or at least a close relative.

Trilobites were a diverse and abundant group of Arthropods which appeared early in the Cambrian, and survived until the End Permian Extinction. Their dorsal exoskeleton was heavily biomineralized, and was shed periodically to allow the animals to grow. This has lead to an extensive fossil record with Trilobites being extremely common in many Palaeozoic marine deposits. This abundant fossil record makes Trilobites an excellent candidate group for the study of malformations.

In a paper published in the journal Acta Palaeontologica Polonica on 22 April 2025, Russell Bicknell of the Division of Paleontology (Invertebrates) at the American Museum of Natural History, and the Palaeoscience Research Centre at the University of New England, Patrick Smith of the Palaeontology Department at the Australian Museum Research Institute, and the Department of Biological Sciences at Macquarie University, Lisa Amati of Paleontology at the New York State Museum, and Melanie Hopkins, also of the Division of Paleontology (Invertebrates) at the American Museum of Natural History, describe malformations in European Silurian and Devonian Trilobite specimens from the collections of the Natural History Museum in London and the New York State Museum.

The first specimen examined by Bicknell et al., NYSM 19739, is an isolated cephalon (head part) from a Harpetid Trilobite, Lioharpes venulosus, from the Early Devonian Koněprusy Limestone of the Czech Republic, in the collection of the New York State Museum. The cephalon is 26.2 mm long and 22.3 mm wide with a u-shaped indentation on its right marginal rim. This indentation is 5.6 mm long and extends 1.9 mm towards the midline. The marginal rim is covered in small circular pits, which around the indentation are irregular, ovate, and occasionally fused into larger pits.

Malformed Harpetid Trilobite Lioharpes venulosus, NYSM 19739 from the Koněprusy Limestone, Pragian, Lower Devonian, Koněprusy, Czech Republic. (A₁) complete cephalon; (A₂) close up showing U-shaped indentation (arrow). Specimen coated in ammonium chloride sublimate. Bicknell et al. (2025).

Bicknell et al. note that malformations to the cephalic fringes of Harpetid Trilobites have been recorded before, and that these are usealy attributed to injuries, an analysis with which they concur. However, they also observe that injuries can happen in a variety of ways, with fringe injuries having previously attributed to problems during moulting, failed predation attempts, or unknown causes. They suggest that a moulting injury is the most likely explanation for the injury to the Koněprusy specimen, with the delicate fringe likely torn during moulting, and the enlarged and fused pits being a result of fusion of the torn margin during healing. Various purposes have been suggested for the cephalic fringes of Harpetid Trilobites, including filtering for food, sensory roles, sediment ploughing, hydrostatic support, cephalic reinforcement, burrowing, and enhancing hydrodynamic efficiency. Whatever the purpose of this organ, an injury to it is likely to have been detrimental to the living Trilobite, and presumably repairing this injury would have been a priority during subsequent moults.

The second specimen, NHMUK PI In 65061, looked at is a Phacopid Trilobite, Calymene blumenbachii, from the Early Silurian Much Wenlock Limestone Formation of Shropshire, England, in the collection of the Natural History Museum. This specimen comprises a partial cephalon, thorax, and pygidium, with a total length of 92.9 mm and a width of 48.6 mm. The second thoracic axial ring (middle part of the second segment of the thorax) of this specimen is covered by a structure with closely spaced openings, which has an elevated round crater at its right extremity, with an opening 1.7 mm across.

Bicknell et al. interpret this as an encrusting Trepostome Bryozoan covering the 3rd thoracic tergite, with the larger opening being an ovate zoarium (specially modified zooid which produced eggs). The restriction of the encrustation to one tergite strongly suggests that this happened while the Trilobite was alive, and that the Bryozoan colony was therefore unable to overgrow the articulations between tergites.

Abnormal Calymenid Trilobites Calymene blumenbachii from the Much Wenlock Limestone Formation, Homerian, Wenlock, Silurian, England, UK. (A) NHMUK PI In 65061, (A₁) complete specimen; (A₂) close up showing the large bryozoan growth. (B) NHMUK PI In 19857 showing pygidial ribs that terminate early (white arrows) and are fused proximal to the medial lobe (black arrow).  Bicknell et al. (2025).

The next specimen examined, NHMUK PI In 19857, is another example of Calymene blumenbachii from the Much Wenlock Limestone. This specimen is a partial pygidium (tail part) 13.2 mm long and 18.2 mm wide. On the right side of this specimen the pygidial ribs are disrupted and irregular, with two ribs terminating 1.6 mm short of the pygidial margin, while another two fuse 1.2 mm from the pygidial axis.

Bicknel et al. observe that similar deformations to the pygidia have been observed in a wide range of other Trilobites, including Dalmanities pleuroptyx, Dechenella macrocephalus, Niobina sp., and Prionopeltis archiaci. They attribute these deformations to genetic or developmental issues, but suggest that the limited disruption to the pygidium they caused did not represent a major handicap.

Specimen NYSM 19740 is an Acastid Trilobite, Treveropyge sp., from the early Devonian Saint Céneré Formation of Mayenne in northwest France. this specimen is another isolated pygidium, s 11.6 mm long and 17.9 mm wide. It has a deformation to the axial lobe, which is asymmetric, with two of the axial rings malformed and curving to the right.

Malformed Acastid Trilobite Treveropyge sp., NYSM 19740 from the Saint Céneré Formation, Lochkovian, Lower Devonian, Mayenne, France. (A₁) Complete pygidium; (A₂) close up showing asymmetrical axial lobe and incomplete axial ring (arrows). Specimen coated in ammonium chloride sublimate. Bicknell et al. (2025).

Again, Bicknell et al. note that similar deformations have been seen in other Trilobites, such as Calliops marginatus, Dolicholeptus licticallis, and Sceptaspis lincolnensis. They suggest that these malformations are caused by genetic deformations, leading to incomplete development or non-functional somites.

The final specimen examined, NHMUK PI I 1108, is an external impression of a partial pygidium belonging to the Styginid Trilobite Scutellum (Scutellum) pardalios, from the Middle Devonin Barton Limestone Member of Devon, England. This impression is t is 59.5 mm long and 44.0 mm wide. On the right side of this impression (i.e. on the left side of the Trilobite) two ribs fuse into a single rib 29.1 mm from the pygidial axis. This single rib then terminates 4.8 mm from the pygidial margin.

Malformed Styginid Trilobite Scutellum (Scutellum) pardalios, NHMUK PI I 1108 from the Barton Limestone Member, Torquay Limestone Formation, Givetian, Middle Devonian, England, UK. (A₁) Pygidium preserved as external impression; (A₂) close up showing fused pygidial pleurae (arrows). Bicknell et al. (2025).

Bicknell et al. note that the surface of the pygidium was covered with ornamentation, with no visible break in this, which appears to  rule out the malformation having been formed by an unsuccessful predation attempt, or similar injury. Recovery from injury is the most commonly sited reason for malformations seen in Styginid Trilobites, followed by parasitic infections during early development, which seems equally unlikely. Bicknell et al. suggest instead that this deformity might be the result of a difficult moult, or possibly a genetic aberration. They do not believe this minor deformity would have significantly affected the living Trilobite.

See also...

Fireball meteor over Luxembourg.

Witnesses across Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland, northern France, western Germany, southeast England, northern Italy, and parts of Austria, have reported observing a bright fireball meteor around 2.30 am local time (around 0.30 am GMT) on Sunday 6 April 2025. The fireball is described as having moved from southeast to northwest, appearing over the Grand Est region of northeastern France and disappearing overr Luxembourg. A fireball is defined as a meteor (shooting star) brighter than the planet Venus. These are typically caused by pieces of rock burning up in the atmosphere, but can be the result of man-made space-junk burning up on re-entry.

The 6 April 2025 meteor seen from the Saint-Luperce, France. Romain Kropp/Météo-Centre-Val de Loire/American Meteor Society.

Objects of this size probably enter the Earth's atmosphere several times a year, though unless they do so over populated areas they are unlikely to be noticed. They are officially described as fireballs if they produce a light brighter than the planet Venus. The brightness of a meteor is caused by friction with the Earth's atmosphere, which is typically far greater than that caused by simple falling, due to the initial trajectory of the object. Such objects typically eventually explode in an airburst called by the friction, causing them to vanish as a luminous object. However, this is not the end of the story as such explosions result in the production of a number of smaller objects, which fall to the ground under the influence of gravity (which does not cause the luminescence associated with friction-induced heating).

Heat map showing areas where sightings of the meteor were reported (warmer colours indicate more sightings), and the apparent path of the object (blue arrow). American Meteor Society.

These 'dark objects' do not continue along the path of the original bolide, but neither do they fall directly to the ground, but rather follow a course determined by the atmospheric currents (winds) through which the objects pass. Scientists are able to calculate potential trajectories for hypothetical dark objects derived from meteors using data from weather monitoring services.

See also...

Series of 'curse-amulets' found in burials at Romano-Gaulish cemetery in Orléans, France.

Archaeologists from Le Service Archaeologie Orléans have discovered a series of  'curse-amulets' in burials at a Romano-Gaulish cemetery beneath an eighteenth century hospital in the city of Orléans in north-central France, according to a press release issued on 7 January 2025. The cemetery, which was discovered in 2022, was already considered unusual, in that it comprises a single row of about 60 graves along a wall, and that all of those buried here appear to have been adult males, contrary to typical Roman practice. The burials are thought to date from the first-to-third centuries AD. All of the dead were buried in painted wooden coffins, with no sign of any cremations. Curiously, 21 of the graves also contained 'curse-amulets'.

Location of the 'curse-amulet', labelled as 'Tablette de défixion' within burial F2199 at the Orléans Romano-Gaulish cemetery. Le Service Archaeologie Orléans.

'Curse-amulets' (properly called 'defixion tablets') are sheets of lead upon which an inscription calling for supernatural intervention has been written. The use of lead was not just practical (although it was practical, since the soft nature of lead made it easy to inscribe and fold or roll up) but also served a symbolic purpose, lead being associated with the underworld and the gods who dwelt there in the Greek and Roman worlds. Thus, the invocations on these amulets were typically calling on these gods to cause harm to someone, with more benign prayers written on different materials. Curse amulets were often hidden somewhere on their intended victims property, or buried deep in the ground where they might better reach the chthonic deities.

The curse amulet recovered from grave F2199 in its folded state. Le Service Archaeologie Orléans.

To date, one of the curse amulets from Orléans has been partially deciphered. This amulet, from grave F2199, was carefully unrolled and then chemically treated to remove patches of corrosion and protect its surface from further degradation. The inscription thus revealed was to faint to be read by the Human eye, but has been largely revealed using Reflectance Transformation Imaging, a method which involves taking photographs from a large number of different angles, then using software to create a three-dimensional model of the surface. An online tool showing Reflectance Transformation Imaging of the amulet can be found here. 

The text revealed on the amulet from grave F2199 by Reflectance Transformation Imaging. Le Service Archaeologie Orléans.

The inscription revealed appears to be in the ancient Gallic language, written in Latin cursive, with some borrowed words from Greek and Latin. This has been interpreted as 'ib r…mi [m]arte rigisamu | a]nmantigIu, Se uiron bnanon uanderonado brixton sod-esti, Cisin…piSSlon atlon atemiston, Etic se-uiron banon canti piSSiantas, Sollebne(m), Marulliam, Sulpici(i), Claudia(m), Marulliam g., Curiatiu(m), Mat|(e)rno(n), Tiberium, Cantognati, Sulpici(i), (B)regesia, Regina Italica pri(uata) Sulpici(i), Regina Regina, Regina dona Tibe(rius), [..]ix, Ateporigis, Lecti, (Se)gouisu(m)'. 

Gallic is not a well-understood language, but can be deciphered to some extent by comparison to other ancient Celtic languages, such as Old Irish, Old Breton, and Old Welsh. The inscription  has been translated by the linguist Pierre-Yves Lambert as reading 'To Mars the Royal, who pierces names, It is the bewitchment of these men and women below (named) who accomplished the unfortunate and unjust feat, and also all those who were accomplices of these men and women', followed by a list of Latin names, then an invocation to 'Regina' (presumably a reference to a deity), then some more names in Gallic.

See also...

Numenius tenuirostris: The Slender-billed Curlew declared extinct.

The Earth's biodiversity is considered to be facing a crisis at a global level, with many experts believing that species may be going extinct at a rate as high as during the great extinctions recorded in the fossil record. Despite this, it is very hard to determine how many species are going extinct, in part because many species have never been documented, but also because it is generally impossible to tell whether a species is extinct, unless it can be confidently asserted that all populations were being monitored prior to extinction. The best recorded organisms tend to be Vertebrates, and one of the most extensively monitored Vertebrate groups are the Birds, a group which tend to be highly visible, and which are often recorded extensively by non-professional citizen-science groups. Despite this attention, many species of Birds have not been seen for a long time, and this cannot always be taken as evidence that they have become extinct: for instance, the Black-browed Babbler, Malacocincla perspicillata, was rediscovered in 2020 after not being observed in 180 years. The apparent extinction of species can be problematic, causing conservationists to cease efforts to protect a species which is close to extinction; conversely failure to realise that a species has become extinct can lead to efforts being dedicated to preserving it which could otherwise have been directed towards other species which might still be saved.

In a paper published in the journal Ibis on 17 November 2024, Greame  Buchanan of the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Ben Chapple of the Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research at University College London, Alex Berryman of BirdLife International, Nicola Crockford of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Justin Jansen of the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, and Alexander Bond of the Bird Group at the Natural History Museum, formally declare the Slender-billed Curlew, Numenius tenuirostris, to be extinct.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species currently lists the Slender-billed Curlew as Critically Endangered, on the assumption that the total population is less than 50 Birds and declining. The species is believed to be restricted to the Palaearctic biogeographical region, breeding in central Asia and migrating to Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and the Arabian Peninsula. Slender-billed Curlews are thought to breed to the east of the Ural Mountains, in the area around Omsk in southern Russia. Isotope studies of museum specimens suggest that the species may also have bred further south, in northern Kazakhstan, while some eggs assigned to the species, also in museum collections, indicate that the species may also have bred to the west of the Urals. Outside of the breeding season the Birds ranged west as far as Western Europe and the Atlantic coast of North Africa, being known from across the Mediterranean Region, the Middle East, the Arabian Peninsula, and the Pannonian Plains of southeast Central Europe.

Once widespread in Europe, Slender-billed Curlews were last observed in Brittany, France, in February 1968, and in North Yemen in January 1984. A colony, thought to be the last, was known on the Atlantic coast of Morocco in the 1990s, with the last reported sighting in the winter of 1997/8, although a flock of Slender-billed Curlews was photographed in southern Italy in  March 1995. No subsequent observations of the species have been made, despite extensive searches across its former range, including the Middle East and Central Asia.

The last known photograph of a group of Slender-billed Curlews, taken in southern Italy in March 1995. Marco Basso in van den Berg (1995).

The Slender-billed Curlew was first observed breeding in 1912 by Russian ornithologist Valentin Ushakov, who first noted that the species appeared to be in decline. The possibility that Slender-billed Curlews might be at risk of extinction was first raised in 1943 by German ornithologists Erwin Stresemann and Hermann Grote, but it was not until 1988 that the species was identified as Threatened by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. The species was listed as Critically Endangered in 1994, following a re-assessment of its status, and an action plan for its recovery was produced in 1996. 

Based upon this long absence from its known range, and the extensive, yet unproductive, searched which have been made in the last three decades, combined with the declining number of sightings recorded throughout the twentieth century, Buchanan et al. carried out a statistical analysis of the probability that the species might still exist. Based upon this, they conclude that is most likely that the species became extinct in the 1990s, with only a miniscule possibility that the species might still exist in the 2020s.

If this analysis is correct, then the Slender-billed Curlew is only the third species of Bird known to spend a large part of its annual cycle in the Western Palaearctic to have become extinct since 1500, joining the Great Auk, Pinguinus impennis, last reported in 1844, and the Canarian Oystercatcher, Haematopus meadewaldoi, last observed in 1913. 

A preserved museum specimen of a juvenile male Slender-billed Curlew, Numenius tenuirostris. Naturalis Biodiversity Center/Wikimedia Commons.

It is difficult to directly assess the cause of the extinction of the Slender-billed Curlew, since it is likely that the species finally died out around the time that an action plan for its survival was first drawn up. When that plan was produced, it identified that the species was threatened by habitat loss across its range, and potentially being hunted in some areas as well. 

The only records of breeding by the Slender-billed Curlew are those made by Valentin Ushakov in southern Russia in the early twentieth century. It is possibly that the main breeding area for the species was further south, on the steppes of northern Kazakhstan, which were extensively converted to croplands by the Russian Empire and Soviet Union in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, in the process destroying extensive wetlands, which might have served as breeding grounds for Slender-billed Curlews, however, without further evidence, this is purely speculative. 

See also...