Showing posts with label Silesaurids. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Silesaurids. Show all posts

Sunday, 12 January 2025

Ahvaytum bahndooiveche: A Sauropodomorph Dinosaur from the mid-late Carnian of Wyoming.

The Carnian (237 to 227 million years ago) is the first epoch of the Middle Triasssic, and is noted for the appearance and spread of the Dinosaurs and their close relatives, while other groups, such as the Rhynchosaurs, Dicynodonts, and Stereospondyl Amphibians, which had dominated Early and Middle Triassic assemblages, began to decline significantly. However, all known Carnian Dinosaurs to date come from the Southern Hemisphere, with the oldest known Dinosaur from the Northern Hemisphere, the Theropod Lepidus praecisio from the Otis Chalk of Texas, being at most 221 million years old.

Carnian-aged Dinosaurs are known from a number of Southern Hemisphere locations, including Brazil, Argentina, Zimbabwe, and India (today in the Northern Hemisphere, but during the Triassic in the Southern Hemisphere). All of these are from high latitude locations (i.e. they were from a long way from the equator), which has been suggested to indicate that a hostile climate probably stopped them from spreading into other areas, at least until the Carnian Pluvial episode, between 234 and 232 million years ago, during which the global climate shifted, becoming significantly more humid.

This has led palaeontologists to conclude that the first Dinosaurs appeared during the early Carnian (or possibly a little earlier) in the Southern Hemisphere. However, this hypothesis is based upon the absence of Dinosaur fossils from other areas, something which could equally be caused by poor sampling of early Carnian rocks from the Northern Hemisphere. This alternative merits serious consideration, as Carnian deposits are rare in the Northern Hemisphere, and often poorly dated. Furthermore, a number of rock formations in the Northern Hemisphere which have been dated to the early Carnian have produced trace fossils which are attributed to Dinosaurs, strongly indicating their presence in areas where body fossils have not been found.

In a paper published in the Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society on 8 January 2024, David Lovelace and Aaron Kufner of the Department of Geoscience and Geology Museum at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Adam Fitch, also of the Geology Museum at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Kristina Curry Rogers of the Biology and Geology departments at Macalester CollegeMark Schmitz and Darin Schwartz of the Department of Geosciences at Boise State University, Amanda LeClair-Diaz and Lynette St.Clair of Fort Washakie Schools, Joshua Mann of the Eastern Shoshone Tribal Historic Preservation Office, and Reba Teran, a Shoshone Language Consultant  at Wind River Reservation, describe a Sauropodomorph Dinosaur, as  well as an indeterminate Silesaurid, from the mid-late Carnian Popo Agie Formation of Wyoming.

The Popo Agie Formation is a Carnian-aged deposit which outcrops across western Wyoming, western Colorado, and Utah. It was laid down in a series of lakes and rivers which are thought to have covered much of what is now the American Southwest at this time. Vertebrate fossils are rare in the Popo Agie Formation, though it has produced Metoposaurid Temnospondyls, Hyperodapedontine Rhynchosaurs, and Loricatan Archosaurs, and has two notable horizons with mass-death assemblages of Metoposaurid and Latiscopid Stereospondyls.

The fossils described by Lovelace et al. come from a site 1 km south of the confluence of the East Fork of the Wind River and Spear Creek called Garrett’s Surprise, in reference to its discoverer, Garrett Johnson, who found the site while working as an undergraduate field assistant on undergraduate field assistant. The discovery was surprising because the surrounding geology is dominated by the Eocene Wind River Formation, with the much older Popo Agie Formation exposed in an erosional gully. 

The Sauropodomorph Dinosaur is described from a single isolated left astragalus, with the proximal end of a left femur which shows o clear Saurischian affinities also referred to the same species. This femur fragment was found within 5 m of the original specimen, and both specimens are encrusted with a similar micritic carbonate. The new species is named Ahvaytum bahndooiveche, where 'Ahvaytum' means 'long ago' and 'bahndooiveche' means 'handsome young man', 'Salamander', or 'Dinosaur' in the Shoshone language.

Holotype left astragalus of Ahvaytum bahndooiveche. (UWGM 1975). 3D model in (A) medial, (B) lateral, (C) lateral transparent, (D) posterior transparent, (E) distal, (F) proximal, (I) anterior, and ( J) posterior orthographic views. Photographs in (G) proximal and (H) distal views. Abbreviations: amc, anteromedial corner; ap, ascending process of the astragalus; g, groove; f, foramen; ff, fibular facet; ldn, laterodistal notch (= lateroventral depression); mf, medial fossa; nf, non-articular fossa (= dorsal basin, = semi-elliptical fossa); p, platform; plp, posterolateral process; plr, posterolateral ridge; tf, tibial facet. Diagonal lines indicate broken surfaces. Arrows indicate anterior direction. Scale bar is 1 cm. Lovelace et al. (2025).

Lovelace et al. note that Western taxonomy has a history deeply rooted in colonialism, with taxa often given names that reflect geographic features, regions, or waterways named by colonizers who did not recognize or validate pre-existing Indigenous names. In recognition of this, the name 'Ahvaytum bahndooiveche' was chosen by a collaborative project involving the Fort Washakie Schools 7th grade cohort of 2022, along with educators, Eastern Shoshone Tribal Historic Preservation Office, and Tribal Elders.

A reconstruction of Ahvaytum bahndooiveche as a small Sauropodomoph Dinosaur, along with an audio-explanation of the origin of its name. Lovelace et al. (2025).

The specimens assigned to Ahvaytum bahndooiveche were recovered from the surface of the upper part of a sandstone layer within the Popo Agie known as the Purple Unit. Uranium/lead analysis of zircons from this layer have yielded ages of between 227.34 and 229.04 million years before the present, with the layer which produced Ahvaytum bahndooiveche no more than 228 million years old. This places the fossils in the early Carnian, only slightly after the Carnian Pluvial Event.  Zircon is a volcanic mineral that forms as liquid magma slowly cools to form solid rock. As zircon forms it can incorporate a variety of different elements into its crystal matrix, including uranium but not lead. This is useful as over time uranium decays to form lead, so any lead in a zircon mineral must be the result of the decay of uranium. Since the decay of uranium to lead occurs at a steady rate, it is possible to determine the age of zircons by measuring the ratio of uranium to lead within them.

Proximal end of a left femur UWGM 7549 (A)–(E) referred to Ahvaytum bahndooiveche. 3D model in (A) anteromedial, (B) posterolateral, (C) proximal, (D) anterolateral, and (E) posteromedial orthographic views. Abbreviations: alt, anterolateral tuber; amt, anteromedial tuber; ce, concave emargination; dlt, dorsolateral trochanter; ft, fossa trochanterica (= facies articularis antitrochanterica); gt, ‘greater trochanter’; pmt, posteromedial tuber; ve, ventral emargination. Arrows indicate anterior direction. Scale bar is 1 cm. Lovelace et al. (2025).

As well as the specimens assigned to Ahvaytum bahndooiveche, the Purple Unit yielded the distal end of a left humerus (UWGM 7550) and the proximal end of a right femur (UWGM 7407), which Lovelace et al. determined to belong to a Silesaurid Dinosauriform.

Photographs of Sulcimentisaurian Silesaurid elements from the Garrett’s Surprise locality. Distal end of a left humerus UWGM 7550 (A)–(E) in (A) anterior, (B) posterior, (C) medial, (D) lateral, (E) and distal views. Proximal end of a right femur UWGM 7407 (F)–(J) in (F) proximal, (G) anterolateral, (H) posteromedial, (I) posterolateral, and ( J) anteromedial views. Abbreviations: alt, anterolateral tuber; amt, anteromedial tuber; at, anterior trochanter; dlt, dorsolateral trochanter; ect, ectepicondyle; ent, entepicondyle; g, groove; gt, ‘greater trochanter;’ ipmt, incipient posteromedial tuber; n, notch; rc, radial condyle; uc, ulnar condyle. Arrows point in the anterior direction. Scale bar equals 1 cm. Lovelace et al. (2025).

Silosaurids have long been considered the sister group to the Dinosaurs. However, a number of recent phylogenetic analyses, including that of Lovelace et al. have been unable to demonstrate that they are a separate clade, less closely related to Saurischian Dinosaurs than Ornithopod Dinosaurs are. This raises the posibility that Silosaurids are Dinosaurs, either being an early diverging group of Ornithpods, a separate group more closely related to Saurischians, or a polyophyletic group, potentially including both plus some in the original Dinosaur-sister-group position (many Silosaurids are known from highly fragmentary remains, so this would not be surprising). If the Silodaurids are Dinosaurs, then they increase the age of the Dinosaurs as a group, as they are present in the Ladinian Epoch (between 241 and 237 million years ago), whereas the oldest known non-Silosaurid Dinosaur fossils all date from the Carnian. Either way, Silosaurids have previously only been known from Southern Hemisphere sights before the discovery of the Garrett's Surprise specimen.

Finally, Lovelace et al. describe a partial foot print from the upper Jelm Formation at Red Wall in Natrona County, Wyoming. This is small, roughly 8.0 x 5.6 cm, and comprises a partial hindlimb print with digits II–IV, with a very faint associated possibly forelimb trace. The pes digits are relatively straight, long, and slender with small acuminate claw impressions. Pads are observable, but not sharply defined. Lovelace et al. consider that this could be assigned to either of the ichnogenera Atreipus or Grallator. The trace is preserved on a slab which has fallen from the Red Wall (a cliff), but can confidently be sourced to a section 1-2 m thick, about 15 m beneath the top of the Jelm Formation, which stratigraphically underlies the Popo Agie Formation. 

UWGM 7435 (left) is an isolated slab containing a single tridactyl pes and possible manus impression attributed to an AtreipusGrallator plexus tracemaker from the upper Jelm Formation, Natrona County, Wyoming, USA. (A) Digital surface-depth map (right) produced in METASHAPE (v.2.0.3; Agisoft) from surface light-scans demonstrates the depth and toe pad delineations of pes (p) digits II–IV. The manus impression may be present (m?); other than a very slight depression there are no morphological features to confidently identify it as such. Scale bar is in 1-cm increments. Lovelace et al. (2025).

See also...

Friday, 3 November 2023

Amanasaurus nesbitti: A new species of Silesaurid Dinosauromorph from the Late Triassic of Brazil.

Silesaurids were a group of Triassic Archosaurs which typically possessed slender limbs and a beak-like projection from the tip of the lower jaw. They are known from the Middle Triassic of Brazil, Tanzania, and Zambia, supporting a Gondwanan origin, with Late Triassic specimens known from both Gondwana and Laurasia. No Jurassic or later Silesaurid has ever been discovered, implying that they died out in the End Triassic Extinction. The exact phylogenetic position of the Silesaurids is unclear, with suggestions having been made that they are the closest relatives and sister group to the Dinosaurs, or that they are Ornithischian Dinosaurs, ever being a distinct clade which forms a sister group to all other members of the Ornithischia, or as a series of early-branching clades forming a stem-group to the 'core Ornithischians'.

In a paper published in the journal Scientific Reports on 11 April 2023, Rodrigo Müller and Maurício Garcia of the Centro de Apoio à Pesquisa Paleontológica da Quarta Colônia and Programa de Pós‑Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal at the Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, describe a new species of Silesaurid from the Carnian (earliest Late Triassic) of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. 

The new species is named Amanasaurus nesbitti, where 'Amanasaurus' means 'rain-Lizard' in reference to the Carnian Pluvial Episode, a period of climatic change at the onset of the Late Triassic associated with significant species turnover and the emergence of a number of significant groups, during which this species would have lived, and 'nesbitti' honours palaeontologist Sterling Nesbitt, an expert on Triassic Archosaurs, who first described the Silesauridae. It is described on the basis of the proximal portion of a right femur from the lower portion of the Candelária Sequence between the municipalities of Restinga Sêca and São João do Polêsine. A distal portion of a left femur from an individual slightly larger than the holotype and excavated from the same locality is also referred to the species.

Provenance of Amanasaurus nesbitti. (a) Surface distribution of the geologic units in the area depicting the location of the Pivetta site. (b) General view of the Pivetta site. (c) Hypothetical reconstruction of the skeleton of Amanasaurus nesbitti depicting (in orange) the preserved portions. (d) CAPPA/UFSM 0374 (holotype), a proximal portion of a right femur in anterior view. (e) CAPPA/UFSM 0375 (referred specimen), a distal portion of a lef femur in anterior view. Müller & Garcia (2023).

Although this material is extremely fragmentary, The proximal femur portion is well preserved and possesses typical traits of Silesaurs, such as the presence of a notch between the ventral transition from the femoral head to the femoral shaft and a straight medial articular facet of the proximal portion in proximal view, making Müller and Garcia confident in the assignment of the specimen to the Silesauridae, as well as a number of unique features, including the absence of a posteromedial tuber of the femoral head, the ventral margin of the anteromedial tuber exceeding the femoral head margin, the presence of a fossa trochanterica, the absence of a raised anterolateral scar, the ; presence of a semi-circular scar on the posterodorsal surface of the femoral head, and a cleft between the proximal tip of the anterior trochanter and the femoral shaft.

Holotype and referred specimen of Amanasaurus nesbitti from the Candelária Sequence (mid-to-late Carnian) of the Santa Maria Super-sequence, southern Brazil. Holotype (CAPPA/UFSM 0374) in anterior (a), lateral (b), proximal (c), medial (d), and posterior (e) views. Referred specimen (CAPPA/UFSM 0375) in anterior (f), lateral (g), posterior (h), and distal (i) views. Abbreviations: alt, anterolateral tuber; amt, anteromedial tuber; at, anterior trochanter; cl, cleft; ctf, crista tibiofbularis; dlt, dorsolateral trochanter; dltp, posterior portion of the dorsolateral trochanter; fo, foramen; fot, fossa trochanterica; gt, greater trochanter; lc, lateral condyle; lia, linea intermuscularis cranialis; mc, medial condyle; ms, muscle scar; no, notch; pg, proximal groove; pof, popliteal fossa; scs, sub-circular scar. Müller & Garcia (2023).

See also...

Online courses in Palaeontology

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.


Sunday, 21 April 2019

Silesaurus opolensis: Coprolites from the Late Triassic of Poland shed light on the diet of a Dinosauriform Archosaur.

Coprolites, fossil feces, can be highly useful tools to paleontologists, helping them to understand diversity and trophic relationships in ancient ecosystems, and on occasion specific animals. Coprolites can contain a variety of useful items, such as residues, microbiota and parasites, and since they often have high phosphorous levels, can mineralise rapidly after deposition, allowing the preservation of soft tissues within them that might escape preservation elsewhere - as long as those soft tissues have first survived passage through the coprolite-producers digestive system. The size and shape of coprolites can provide clues as to the animal which produced them, while examining the contents is generally accomplished by cutting them into thin sections, a destructive process which may miss some of the contents.

In a paper published in the journal Royal Society Open Science on 13 March 2019, Martin Qvarnström and Joel Vikberg Wernström of the Department of Organismal Biology at Uppsala University, Rafał Piechowski of the Institute of Paleobiology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, and the Department of Palaeobiology and Evolution at the University of Warsaw, Mateusz Tałanda, also of the Department of Palaeobiology and Evolution at the University of Warsaw, and Per Ahlberg and Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki, also of the Department of Organismal Biology at Uppsala University, describe the contents of a selection of coprolites from the Late Triassic of Krasiejów in Upper Silesia, Poland, which were scanned using propagation phase-contrast synchrotron microtomography at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble, France, enabling a three dimensional reconstruction of their contents.

The Late Triassic deposits exposed at Krasiejów are about 30 m in depth, and include two fossiliferous layers, each about 1.0-1.5 m in depth. These appear to represent two separate ecosystems, with the lower one containing freshwater organisms such as Fish, Temnospondyl Amphibians, Crocodile-like Phytosaurs, and aquatic Invertebrates, while the other contains animals such as Lizard-like Sphenodonts, Silesaurid Dinosauriforms, predatort Rauisuchids, and armoured Aetosaurs. Both are thought to be Late Carnian in age (between 230 and 227 million years old).

Stratigraphic column of the Krasiejów, Upper Silesia, Poland, site. (a) Composite lithostratigraphic column compiled from exposures measured in the clay-pit with positions of bone-bearing intervals and layer with coprolites. (b), (c) Photographs of the lower (b) and upper (c) coprolite-bearing intervals. (d ) Three dimensional surface models of the studied coprolite specimens. Qvarnström et al. (2019).

Qvarnström et al. examined six coprolites from Krasiejów, three from the lower, aquatic-fauna horizon, and two from the higher, terrestrial fauna horizon, ranging from 31 to 54.5 mm in length, and 16 to 22 mm in width. These contained a variety of Arthropod fragments, including Beetle elytra, other Beetle fragments, parts of unidentified Insects, and other parts of less clear origins.

Coproliteand identified inclusions. (a) Carabid prosternum. (b) Beetle tibia. (c) Beetle tibia. (d ) Entire coprolite in semi-transparent with the identified inclusions as well as some of the indeterminable Arthropod/Insect remains (green). (e) Beetle elytra. (f ) Beetle elytra. (g) Elytron of a Polyphagan (?) Beetle. (h) Beetle elytra. (i) Fragmented large elytron. ( j) Wedge-shaped elytron. (k,l) Two Beetle pronotums. Qvarnström et al. (2019).

There is a clear correlation between the size of the coprolites and the size of the largest Arthropod fragments, although the largest fragments are far smaller than the coprolites. Qvarnström et al. suggest that this may be evidence that the coprolite-producer had a way of separating out larger fragments before they enter the lower digestive tract, possibly regurgitating them as pellets in the same way as modern Birds.

Coprolites  with inclusions. (a) Concretion (semi-transparent) with internal fragmentary coprolite with inclusions. (b) A selection of six Beetle elytra. (c) A part of an Insect appendage? (d ) Enigmatic curved inclusion with denticles on the concave side. (e) Abdomen of an unknown Arthropod. (f ) Semi-transparent coprolite with highlighted inclusions. (g) Two Beetle elytra. (h) Semitransparent coprolite with highlighted inclusions. (i) Thorax plate of unknown Insect. (j) Abdomen of an unknown Arthropod (same as in e). (k) Two Beetle elytra. (l ) Semi-transparent coprolite with highlighted inclusions. (m) A bilateral structure of unknown affinity. (n) Three beetle elytra. (o) A swirl-shaped inclusion maybe representing some inner Insect structure (cf. digestion). Qvarnström et al. (2019).

All of the coprolites are of similar size and shape, and have similar contents, leading Qvarnström et al. to conclude they were all made by the same type of animal, and the absence of any Fish or Plant fragments suggests that the coprorolite producer was an Insectivore rather than a more general carnivore or herbivore. The coprolites appear to have come from a medium-sized producer, they seem to large to have come from any insectivorous Cynodont, Archosaur, or Lepidosaur likely to have been in the area, while the Phytosaurs and Temnospondyls present all show adaptations for piscavory (a diet of Fish) and the Rauisuchians appear to be to large.

The Bird-like Silesaurid Dinosauriform Silesaurus opolensis, however, would seem to be a good candidate for the coprolite-producer, being about the right size, and showing a number of characteristics that could be interpreted as evidence for an insectivorous diet (though it has been previously interpreted as a herbivore). The teeth of this species are triangular, but blunt, and irregularly distributed on the jaw. These teeth lack any of the microwear generally associated with herbivory, nor do they have the course serrations generally associated with a diet of Plants. The jaws of the species lack the capacity for much movement, something that might be expected in an animal tackling tough plant material, and the front part of the jaw is toothless, apparently having been covered by some sort of slender beak, a structure that might be useful for picking out Insects in a complex environment.

The proposed coprolite producer Silesaurus opolensis and some anatomical characters. (a) Braincase in posterior view (oc, paroccipital process; nc, neural canal). (b) Dentary bone in lateral view (bk, beak). (c) Life reconstruction of head. Drawing by Małgorzata Czaja. Qvarnström et al. (2019).

See also...

https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2019/04/antarctanax-shackletoni-new-species-of.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2018/12/smok-sp-large-predatory-rauisuchian.html
https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2018/03/reconstructing-locomotion-of-triassic.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2018/03/archosauromorph-remains-from-early.html
https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2016/11/ixalerpeton-polesinensis-buriolestes.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2016/03/teyujagua-paradoxa-archosauromorph-from.html
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Sunday, 6 October 2013

Tooth microwear in a Silesaurid Archosaur.

The Silesaurids are considered to be the sister group to the Dinosaurs; that is to say they are the group of animals considered to be the closest relatives of the Dinosaurs, without actually being classed as Dinosaurs. They are known only from the Middle to Late Triassic, about 245 to 203 million years ago. It is generally thought that understanding the Silesaurids can help to understand the origin of the Dinosaurs, however the two groups differed in several important ways, one of which is that, while the earliest Dinosaurs are thought to have been small carnivorous species, the Silesaurids are generally held to have been herbivorous. 

In a forthcoming paper in the journal Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, Tai Kubo of the Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum and Mugino Kubo of The University Museum at The University of Tokyo discuss the results of a study into microwear on the teeth of the Late Triassic Silesaurid Silesaurus opolensis, and the implications of these results.

Kubo & Kubo found microwear on the teeth consistent with that seen in modern Mammals with a browsing diet. This implies a diet of leaves, twigs, fruits and other material from higher woody shrubs, as opposed to a grazing diet, eating grass and herbs close to the ground, though limited omnivorey cannot be ruled out by this method of analysis. Microwear on the teeth of modern herbivorous Mammals is mostly associated with a diet of grasses, which produce silica phytoliths to reduce grazing. Grasses had not evolved in the Triassic, but Horsetails were abundant, and these also produce silica phytoliths.

Non-facet microwear of teeth from the left lower jaw. Mesial (left), middle and distal (right) teeth have 8, 13, and 8 SEM sites, respectively, shown as open rectangles in the figure, in which scratch angles were measured. The rose diagram located in the middle of each SEM site represents scratch orientations in the site. The black arrow represents a mean vector orientation of each rose diagram. The rose diagram at the base of each tooth represents the scratch orientation of the whole tooth. We could not lay each SEM site horizontal for observation to eliminate effects of mold curvature. Nevertheless, it is clear that scratches are basically oriented in the apico-basal direction for all teeth. Kubo & Kubo (2012).


See also The first Dinosaur? A predatory Archosaur from the Late Triassic of southern PolandA Silesaurid Dinosauriform from the Late Triassic of Morocco and Identifying Triassic footprints.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Sunday, 17 June 2012

A Silesaurid Dinosauriform from the Late Triassic of Morocco.

Dinosauriforms are the group of Archosaurs including the Dinosaurs and those species more closely related to them than to the Crocodilians or Pterosaurs. Within this group the Silesaurids are the branch most closely related to to the dinosaurs. They lived in the Middle-to-Late Triassic, but probably did not survive until the end of that period.

In a paper published in the journal Acta Palaeontologica Polonica on 11 July 2011, Christian Kammerer of the Division of Paleontology and Richard Gilder Graduate School at the American Museum of Natural HistorySterling Nesbitt of the Jackson School of Geosciences at the University of Texas at Austin and Neil Shubin of the Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy at the University of Chicago, describe a new species of Silesaurid Dinosauriform from the Late Triassic of the Argana Basin in Morocco.

The new species is named as Diodorus scytobrachion; Diodorus being both a semi-mythical king of the Berbers and a Greek Historian (Diodorus Siculus) who wrote about North Africa, scytobrachion meaning 'leathery arm' in Greek, and being the name of another  Greek scholar (Dionysius Scytobrachion) who studied North Africa. It is described from a partial dentary, three isolated teeth, two humeri, a metatarsal and a femur; not all from the same individual, but which Kammerer et al. believe all come from the same species. 

(A₁) Photograph of right dentary in lateral view. (A₂) Photograph of right dentary in medial view. (A₃) Interpretive drawing of (A₁). (A₄) Interpretive drawing of (A₂). (B) Isolated tooth. Kammerer et al. (2011).

(A₁) Photograph of right humerus in anterior view. (A₂) Photograph of right humerus in proximal view. (A₃) Photograph of right humerus in posterior view. (A₄) Photograph of right humerus in distal view. (B₁) Photograph of isolated metatarsal in anterior view. (B₂) Photograph of isolated metatarsal in distal view. Kammerer et al. (2011).

(A) Photograph of left femur in anterior view. (B) Photograph of left femur in lateral view. (C) Photograph of left femur in medial view; the image is presented as a stereopair, two versions of the same image side by side, which can, with the right equipment, be seen in 3D. (D) Photograph of left femur in Proximal view. (E) Photograph of left femur in distal view. Tags: (1) Distal
condyles of femur divided posteriorly between 1/4 and 1/3 the length of the shaft. (2) Notch ventral to the proximal head of the femur. (3) Posteromedial tuber absent on the proximal portion of the femur. (4) flat medial articular surface of the femur head in dorsal view. Kammerer et al. (2011).


Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.