Showing posts with label Giraffes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Giraffes. Show all posts

Monday, 5 March 2018

Giraffe tracks from the Late Pleistocene of Western Cape Province, South Africa.

Giraffes, Giraffa camelopardalis, are iconic African Mammals associated with rich savanna grasslands. Because of their highly distinctive morphology and specific environmental requirements, these animals have the potential to serve as good environmental indicators in the fossil record. Unfortunately, dead animals exposed in the open in savanna environments are unlikely to enter the fossil record, as skeletons are rapidly destroyed by a combination of scavenging and weathering, with almost all fossils found in these environments coming from rock shelters, enclosed spaces where Humans, Hyenas or other predators took prey animals to prevent them being stolen. However the large size of Giraffes means that few predators will attempt to tackle them, generally only Human populations with advanced hunting technologies, and that even when killed these animals are almost impossible to transport to a rock shelter for safe consumption.

In a paper published in the South African Journal of Science on 30 January 2018, Charles Helm of the Peace Region Palaeontology Research Centre and the Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience at Nelson Mandela University, Hayley Cawthra, also of the Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience at Nelson Mandela University, and of Geophysics Competency at the Council for Geoscience, Richard Cowling and Jan De Vynck, again of the Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience at Nelson Mandela University, Curtis Marean, once again of the Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience at Nelson Mandela University, and of the Institute of Human Origins at the Arizona State University Richard McCrea also of the Peace Region Palaeontology Research Centre, and Renee Rust of the Evolutionary Studies Institute at the University of the Witwatersrand, describe a series of preserved Giraffe footprints from a coastal cliff east of Still Bay, in Western Cape Province.

The footprints are preserved in a detached block of aeolian sandstone (i.e. sands that were laid down by the action of the wind rather than water) roughly 3.9 by 7.9 m, which is estimated to be between 133 100 and 114 500 years old, and probably between 126 000 and 121 000 years old. A total of twelve tracks are preserved, with the best preserved tracks being found at the southern end of the block. The block is located in the uppermost part of the tidal zone, making it vulnerable to erosion both by wave action, and by Nodilittorina africana knysnaensis, a coastal Gastropod found in the area which burrows into soft rocks. The slab is believed to have become exposed at some time since 2011, when the area was last surveyed, and is in danger of sliding further into the sea, or being damaged irreparably by the action of the sea and Gastropods. However it is two large to be removed from the location where it is currently perched, making long term preservation impossible. Helm et al.  suggest that instead it may be possible to make moulds of the tracks.

Giraffe tracks on rock surface perched above the Indian Ocean. Helm et al. (2018).

The large size and distinctive nature of the tracks makes it almost certain that the track-maker was a Giraffe, though Helm et al. did consider the possibility of other track-makers. Southern Africa is home to a number of Bovid species, which are often hard to identify from their tracks, so that such markings are generally referred to simply as 'large Bovid', 'medium Bovid' or 'small Bovid', however even the tracks of even the largest of these animals are difficult to mistake for those of the much larger Giraffe. 

One possible extinct track maker is the Sivathere, or Short-necked Giraffe, Sivatherium maurusium, a large animal closely related to the Giraffe, and therefore presumably capable of making similar sized tracks (no tracks directly attributed to a Sivathere have ever been found). However Helm et al. reject the idea of a Sivathere as the track-maker for a number of reasons. Firstly, while the exact date of extinction of the Sivathere is unclear, the youngest known fossils of the species date to about 400 000 years ago, making it likely that they had vanished by the time the Still Bay tracks were laid down. Secondly, all known Sivathere remains are found much further to the north, with the most southerly specimens known coming from around Bloemfontein, making it unlikely that one made tracks at Still Bay (although Giraffes are not known from much further south). Finally, while similar in general proportion to Giraffes, Sivatheres were much more robust, had had a wider gait, which means that their tracks were unlikely to have closely resembled those of Giraffes.

Detail of four Giraffe tracks. The best preserved adult track is left of centre, and the best preserved purported juvenile track appears below it, above the top right corner of the 10 cm scale bar. Helm et al. (2018).

Giraffes are known in Western Cape Province, but are not usually found south of the Orange River, with the most southerly recorded sighting being made at Spoeg River in Namaqualand, by Danish explorer Pieter Van Meerhoff in 1663; this is about 700 km to the north of Still Bay, and in a completely different climatic zone, dominated by Vachellia karroo woodlands (thornscrub) on deep sandy soils. 

Representations of Giraffes have been found in rock art paintings in the Hex River Valley, about 250 km to the northwest of Still Bay, which indicates that the animals were familiar to the people there about 2000-1600 years ago when these images were made. However the rock art makers are believed to have been nomadic in nature, ranging over a wide area of the Western Cape in response to the changing seasons, and there is no reason to believe that they actually observed Giraffes in the Hex River Valley. 

There are also some fossil Giraffe remains in the South African Museum in Cape Town which were originally identified as having come from Darling’, about 350 km to the northwest of Still Bay and 450 km south of Namaqualand, but precise details of how and where these specimens were obtained is lacking, and they are now thought unlikely to have come originally from Darling'.

Tracings of giraffe rock art from Buffelshoekkloof, Kanetvlei, Hex River Valley. Helm et al. (2018).

The Still Bay area today has a wet temperate climate and coastal fynboss vegetation dominated by Proteas and Wild Olives, quite unsuitable for Giraffes. However this climate is known to have varied considerably during the Pleistocene, as has the position of the coastline in the area, which would have retreated away from the area during periods of glacial maximum, including the period when the tracks were laid down. 

Glacial periods are generally associated with cooler, drier climates, even in areas unaffected directly by glaciation. However the Late Pleistocene fauna of the Palaeo-Agulhas Plain, as represented by fossil assemblages from Nelson Bay Cave and Klasies River, includes many species found further north in the Cape today, such as Grysbok, Raphicerus melanotis, Grey Duiker, Sylvicapra grimmia, and Bushbuck, Tragelaphus sylvaticus (these assemblages contain predominantly small animals as they are primarily Human hunting remains), suggestive of a warmer climate, possibly with a seasonal climate with large grazers visiting the area during a local wet season, presumably driven more by the loss of a maritime influence on the climate than by global cooling. 

The presence of Giraffes in this environment adds further support to the idea of a subtropical grassland biome extending southwards into an area with a temperate climate today during periods of glacial cooling, as these animals are found exclusively in subtropical grasslands in Southern Africa today.

(a) Locality of the study area in the context of the south coast of South Africa. The continental shelf which borders this coastline reaches the broadest extent in South Africa, and the 120 m isobath lies up to 100 km offshore. The relatively shallow and low-gradient Agulhas Bank sweeps from Cape Agulhas in the southwest to Robberg in the east. (b) The dominant geological units at the study site, which are formations of the Bredasdorp Group and were deposited in the Neogene and Pleistocene. Helm et al. (2018).

See also...

http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/calculating-role-of-pleistocene-refugia.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/understanding-ancestry-of-european-bison.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/ammotragus-lervia-diet-of-barbary-sheep.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/mapping-distribution-of-southern-pudu.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/capreolus-constantini-roe-deer-from.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/the-genetic-diversity-and-distribution.html
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Wednesday, 4 February 2015

The genetic diversity and distribution of modern Giraffes.


Giraffes, Giraffa camelopardalis, have traditionally been split into nine subspecies based upon their coat patterns, details of the skeleton and geographic distribution. Unlike many other large Mammals they have not been the subject of extensive genetic studies. The limited studies that have previously been undertaken have suggested that the Angolan Giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis, South African Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa, West African Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis peralta, Reticulated Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata, Rothschild’s Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis rothschildi, and Masai Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi, may in fact be separate species, while Thornicroft’s Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti may in fact represent a population of the Masai Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi. The Kordofan Giraffe of Central Africa, Giraffa camelopardalis antiquorum is closely related to the West African Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis peralta, and the Nubian Giraffe,Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis, has never been genetically sampled at all. This lack of understanding of the genetics of Giraffes has the potential to hamper conservation efforts, as Giraffes are currently frequently relocated by Humans, more often with the intention of providing visible Giraffes for the tourism industry than of moving the animals to promote their survival.

In a paper published in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology on 23 October 2014, Friederike Bock of the Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre at the Senckenberg Gesellschaftfür Naturforschung, Julian Fennessy of the Giraffe Conservation Foundation and the School of Biological Earth and EnvironmentalStudies at the University of New South Wales, Tobias Bidon, also of the Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre at the Senckenberg Gesellschaftfür Naturforschung, Andy Tutchings and Andri Marais, also of the Giraffe Conservation Foundation, Francois Deacon of the Giraffe Conservation Foundation and of the Department Animal,Wildlife & Grassland Science at the University of Free State and Axel Janke of the Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre at the Senckenberg Gesellschaftfür Naturforschung and of the Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity at Goethe University Frankfurt, describe the results of a population genetic study covering seven of the nine currently recognised Giraffe subspecies, primarily from regions of southern Africa where Giraffes have not previously been sampled.

A West African Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis peralta, near Koure in Niger. Wikipedia.

Bock et al. used a molecular clock method to estimate the divergence times of the Giraffe subspecies sampled (i.e. work out when the most recent common ancestor of each pairing of Giraffes lived). From this they estimate that the Giraffe subspecies divided into two distinct groups, the Angolan Giraffe, South African Giraffe, and Masai Giraffe to the south and the West African Giraffe, Reticulated Giraffe, Rothschild’s Giraffe and Kordofan Giraffe to the north, about 2.02 million years ago.

Within the southern group the Angolan Giraffe split from the other two species about 1.45 million years ago, and the South African Giraffe and Masai Giraffe split about 610 000 years ago.

In the southern group the Kordofan Giraffe split from the other three species about 780 000 years ago and the Reticulated Giraffe split from the West African Giraffeand Rothschild’s Giraffe about 650 000 years ago. The Reticulated Giraffe was recovered as the closest relative of the West African Giraffe, with the two subspecies having split about 510 000 years ago.

Maximum clade credibility tree of the major Giraffe populations as reconstructed by Bayesian analysis conductedin BEAST. Blue bars indicate 95% highest posterior density intervalsfor node ages, asterisks denote posterior probability >0.95. Scale onthe bottom represents divergence time (million years ago). Bock et al. (2014).

This strongly supports the idea that some Giraffe subspecies should in fact be considered to be species. In other Mammal groups species which diverged over a million years ago, and many which are much more recent are seldom questioned, for example the Chimpanzee and Bonobo are considered to have diverged about 420 000 years ago. Interestingly this also hints that some unrecognised diversity may exist within current subspecies populations, with some Kordofan Giraffes having shared a most recent common ancestor around 430 000 years ago and some Masai Giraffes around 410 000 years ago.

The cause of divergence between African animal populations during the Pleistocene is notoriously hard to unravel. The continent did not suffer extensive glaciations during the period, but did undergo major climatic changes, with cooler drier periods leading to expansions of grasslands and deserts and warmer wetter periods leading to expansions of forests and lakes. In each instance this led to the shrinking and fragmentation of some habitats at as other expanded, driving speciation among African animals.

One surprising pattern that emerged among the Giraffe populations studied was the separation of subspecies in Botswana and Namibia. It has generally been accepted that the Giraffes of Botswana and Namibia are Angolan Giraffes, while the South African Giraffe is found further to the south and east in Zimbabwe and South Africa. However Bock et al. found that only the Giraffes of the Central Kalahari Game Reserve in Botswana and Etosha National Park in Namibia grouped with Angolan Giraffes, while the Giraffes of the Chobe National Park, Moremi Game Reserve, Nxai Pans Park, and Vumbura Concession in northern Botswana and the Bwabwata National Park population in northeastern Namibia are all grouped with South African Giraffes.

(A) Distribution range of Giraffe (yellow patches) and sampling locations. Colours show genetically identified subspecies. (B) Depiction of southern African Giraffe populations and location of geographic boundaries. O-K-Z: Owambo-Kalahari-Zimbabwe epigeiric axis, O-B: Okavango-Bangweulu axis. Bock et al. (2014).


These are populations of particular concern, as the population of Giraffes in northern Botswana is thought to have declined from over 10 000 individuals to under 4000 individuals during the past 10 years, and the Giraffes of the Bwabwata National Park were almost wiped out by poachers in the 1970s and 1980s, with the population having recovered somewhat but still only standing at slightly over 150 individuals.

These populations are separated by less than 500 km in places, distances which should in theory present little obstacle to Giraffe movements, but these populations have apparently remained isolated for over a million years. While there is no good explanation for this line of separation, it has previously been recorded in other animal populations, with separate species of African Elephants (Loxodonta spp.) and subspecies of Damara Dikdik (Madoquada marensis) and Impala (Aepyceros petersi) on either side of the boundary.

See also…

http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/crop-raiding-behaviour-by-chimpanzees.htmlCrop raiding behaviour by Chimpanzees in southwest Uganda.                                            Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, like all the Great Apes, face increasing conflict with Humans throughout their range, driven by logging...
Lions (Panthera leo) are large, charismatic predators currently found in Africa and India, with a fossil record that includes areas of northern Eurasia and North America. Lions outside their current range persisted in North Africa (Barbary Lions) and the Middle East...
All South American Rodents are classified as members of a single monophyletic group, the Caviomorpha. This appears to be most closely related to Rodents with African and Asian distributions; a single fossil from the Early Oligocene of Egypt has been described as a possible Caviomorph. This suggests the Caviomorphs colonized...
 
 
 
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.