Showing posts with label Natural Gas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Natural Gas. Show all posts

Wednesday, 29 May 2024

A potential major lithium source from the Devonian Marcellus Shale of Pennsylvania.

Lithium for use in batteries is a major requirement for a transition to electric vehicles, and as such a potential limiting factor in such a transition. In the US, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act requires that all of the materials used in the production of batteries for electric vehicles be sourced within the country by 2030, making the identification of viable sources of lithium a priority for the industry. Recent research has shown that the saline fluids produced as a biproduct of gas and petroleum extraction are often rich in lithium, presenting a potential solution to this problem. 

This appears to be particularly true for Palaeozoic groundwaters from the Appalachian region. One such promising source is the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale Formation. The Marcellus Shale is currently worked as an 'unconventional' natural gas field, in which methane is extracted from the shale by means of hydraulic fracturing (fracking), a process by which water, sand and chemicals are forced into buried sediments in order to shock them into releasing trapped hydrocarbons, which can then be extracted for commercial use.

This process has also resulted in the extraction of large amounts of hypersaline groundwater being brought to the surface, for which there is little current use, with the effect that 95% of this is pumped back into the ground in further fracking operations. The total dissolved solids present in the Marcellus Shale groundwater exceed 100 000 mg/L, leading to a requirement for it to be treated before re-injection of the water into the ground can be carried out. A significant proportion of this dissolved material is lithium, derived from layers of volcanic ash within the shale. This high proportion of lithium makes the Marcellus Shale groundwater a potential target for lithium extraction. 

Current extraction infrastructure targeting the Marcellus Shale is concentrated around two hotspots for methane production, one in the northeast of Pennsylvania and one in the southwest of the state. The Marcellus Shale is known to vary in composition over its extent, leading to quite different groundwater chemistry in the two areas. Several previous studies have highlighted the possibility of extracting lithium from Palaeozoic brines, but to date none have considered geochemical variation within these sources, which could have a significant impact on the viability of such projects.

In a paper published in the journal Scientific Reports on 16 April 2024, Justin Mackey of the National Energy Technology Laboratory and the University of PittsburghDaniel Bain, also of the University of Pittsburgh, and Greg Lackey, James Gardiner, Djuna Gulliver, and Barbara Kutchko, also of the National Energy Technology Laboratory, present the results of a study which used chemical and production compliance data reported to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to predict the potential yields of lithium from Marcellus Shale groundwaters in the two areas of Pennsylvania where the Shale is currently accessed.

Map of study area showing the Marcellus shale extent, well locations using in decline curve analysis, Water samples used in this study, and previous USGS sample locations. Lithium concentration data was calculated using new data from the study and existing data from the USGS National Produced Waters Database. Mackey et al. (2024).

The proportions of lithium and magnesium in groundwater vary between locations within the Marcellus Shale, leading to differences in the maximum likely estimation of lithium yields in different areas. The proportion of lithium in the water is more variable at wells in the northeastern sector of the Shale, varying between 139 and 267 mg/L. In the southwestern area the proportion of lithium is more constant, varying between 112 and 140 mg/L. Although the lithium is more concentrated in the northeast, more water is produced in the southwest, leading to a higher overall lithium yield. Mackay et al. estimate that a well in the southwest portion of the field could produce between 2.80 and 2,99 tonnes of lithium over ten years, while in the same time a well in the northeast could produce between 1.86 and 2.07 tonnes.

Histogram plot of Monte Carlo simulation results (25 000 simulations) of estimated ultimate lithium mass yield from a single Marcellus Shale gas well over 10-years of assumed continuous production. Regional estimates on lithium yields from a southwest Pennsylvania (SW) well is marginally more (approximately 33%) than its northeast Pennsylvania (NE) counterpart. Mackey et al. (2024).

The proportion of magnesium in the water is far higher in the southwest, averaging 2300 mg/L, compared to an average of 1000 mg/L in the northeast. Thus wells in the southwest will produce between 14.3 and 20.7 times as much magnesium as they do lithium, while wells in the northeast will produce between 2.66 and 7.26 times as much magnesium as lithium. 

Lithium extracted from pore waters from the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania could go a significant way towards meeting the US's need for the metal, although the extraction of the lithium would presumably have an impact on the way the industry works (currently salt rich water is pumped back into wells to produce more methane, with more water produced as a biproduct, which is then re-injected). 

The US currently uses about 3000 metric tonnes of lithium per year, and the Marcellus Shale Pore Waters could potentially provide 38-40% of this need, if all the dissolved lithium in the extracted water was recovered. However, about 95% of the water currently extracted from wells targeting the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania is reinjected, so if the pore water was diverted for lithium extraction, water from a different source would need to be used for this purpose. This would also involve considerable reorganization of the infrastructure surrounding the wells, and reconsideration of the associated the associated environmental and social impacts. Pore water is currently shipped from wells via a pipeline, then redistributed to other wells for re-injection with minimal treatment. Adding lithium-extraction to this process would require a substantial increase in the infrastructure needed, and subsequently the environmental footprint of the operation, although the value of the lithium would probably more than offset the financial cost of this.

The regional variation in the proportion of lithium in the water in the different areas is likely to have an impact on both the method used to extract lithium from the water, and the ultimate lithium yield. The southwestern portion of the Shale appears likely to produce more lithium overall, as well as having a slower decline in productivity. However, this difference is not huge, with southwestern wells probably producing only 26-38% more lithium than northeastern wells over their lifetime. Mackey et al. also note that it is less efficient and more expensive to extract lithium from water with higher magnesium contents, as is the case in southwestern Pennsylvania. The pore water extracted in the northeast of Pennsylvania has a magnesium/lithium ratio similar to that found in the salar Atacama brines of Chile, from which lithium is currently extracted via a combination of evaporation and distillation, demonstrating the economic viability of the process. Extracting lithium from pore water obtained from the southwestern part of the Marcellus Shale may prove to be a more expensive process, due to the need for additional treatment.

The rate at which lithium production from the Marcellus Shale will decline also needs to be taken into consideration. A typical well in the are suffers an 80% decline in water production over two years. This means that to achieve sustainable production of lithium, new wells would have to be brought into production more-or-less continuously, to replace wells where production had fallen below the point of viability. It is possible that improvements in technology will lead to the lives of wells being extended if the main target of the operation becomes lithium rather than shale gas; Mackey et al.'s production estimates are based entirely upon current extraction methods.

Mackey et al.'s study demonstrates that the Marcellus Shale has the potential to make a significant contribution towards the US's lithium needs, based upon a reasonably conservative set of assumptions. Even allowing for significant over-estimation of potential yields, it is likely that the Shale could produce 30% of curent US lithium demands. Current estimates suggest that the Marcellus Shale hosts about 2.7 billion cubic metres of undiscovered methane gas, suggesting that well-drilling activity here is likely to persist for several decades, and expand into other parts of the deposits, such as north-central Pennsylvania. Thus, even if lithium remains a biproduct of shale gas production, there is a potential for this to continue for decades to come.

See also...

Tuesday, 20 December 2022

Three killed by explosion on natural gas pipeline in Russia.

Three workers carrying out maintenance work on a gas pipeline in the Russian Republic of Chuvashia have been killed in an explosion that took place on Tuesday 20 December 2022. A fourth person, described as their driver, is being treated for shock. The explosion produced a fire described as two stories high, but this was quickly extinguished by cutting the gas supply to the pipeline.

Fire caused by an explosion on a gas pipeline in the Russian Republic of Chuvashia, seen from the village of Yambakhtino. Moscow Times.

The explosion occurred on a section of the Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhhorod Pipeline, which is operated by the Russian state-controlled natural gas company Gazprom, and which supplies gas from the Yamburg Gas Field in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, within the West Siberian Arctic Circle, to the Uzhhorod Pumping Station in Western Ukraine, and then on to Central and Western Europe. The explosion interrupted the supply of gas temporarily, but this was quickly restored by switching to a parallel section of pipeline.

The aftermath of an explosion on the Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhhorod Pipeline in the Russian Republic of Chuvashia on 20 December 2022. Ministry of Emergency Situations/AP.

The Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhhorod Pipeline is currently the only pipeline supplying natural gas to Western Europe from Russia; the Nordstream 1 pipeline which ran beneath the Baltic Sea to Germany was shut off by Russian authorities in August, citing equipment problems, although this has widely been interpreted as a response to Germany providing weapons, equipment and training to Ukraine following the Russian invasion of that country in February this year. A second Baltic pipeline, Nordstream 2, was never brought into service, after Germany withdrew support for the project in protest at the invasion of Ukraine. A section of both pipelines beneath the Baltic was destroyed by an explosion in September, with Swedish investigators subsequently finding traces of explosives at the site, although who blew it up, and why, remains unclear.

See also...

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.


Monday, 5 July 2021

Ruptured gas pipeline leads to fountain of fire in the Gulf of Mexico.

A fire broke out on the sea surface in the Gulf of Mexico, after a natural gas pipeline ruptured on Friday 2 July 2021. The pipeline, which connected the KU-C satellite platform on the Ku Maloob Zaap Oil Field, ruptured some time before 5.15 am local time, when the leaking gas ignited, with the fire being brought completely under control by 10.30 am. Although dramatic, nobody was hurt during the incident. It is unclear at this time how the pipeline was damaged, or how the leaking gas was subsequently ignited.

 
A fire on the surface of the Gulf of Mexico on 2 July 2021, caused by a ruptured natural gas pipeline. Manuel López San Martín/Twitter.

The Ku Maloob Zaap oil field is worked by the Mexican state-owned Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex), in the Bay of Campeche, off the coast of Tabasco State, on the Yucatan Peninsula. The oil field is actually made up of three separate reserves, the Ku reserve, located in Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) deposits, the Maloob, which is in Late Cretaceous-Palaeocene strata, and the Eocene Zaap reserve. The field is worked by seventeen drilling platforms connected by 166 km of pipeline. The field has been worked since the early 1980s, with peak production reached in 2009, when the field was producing more than 130 million litres of oil and over three billion litres of natural gas per day, with production having declined steadily since that time.

See also...














Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Follow Sciency Thoughts on Twitter.

 

Sunday, 24 December 2017

Explosion injures worker at Collorado oil and gas well.

A worker has been injured in an explosion at a oil and gas drilling site in Weld County, Colorado, on Friday 22 December 2017. The incident happened slightly before 9.00 pm at the Extraction Oil & Gas operated plant, which is on the outskirts of the city of Windsor, triggering multiple fires which were not all extinguished until 1.00 pm the next day. The cause of the incident is still being investigated.

Fires burning at an oil drilling facility outside Windsor, Colorado, on 22 December 2017. Fox 31 Denver.

Firefighters from Windsor Severance Fire Rescue who attended the site initially had trouble controlling the fire, due to an absence of fire hydrants at the facility, which required them to divert water from a main providing domestic supplies. The fire was eventually brought under control with the aid of firefighters from several neighbouring services, using a foam extinguishing agent that covers burning material, excluding oxygen from the sites of the fire. About 7275 litres of this substance were used, which since it is diluted with water before use, would indicate the use of about 150  000 litres of water.

Column of smoke and fire over an oil drilling facility outside Windsor, Colorado, on 22 December 2017. Hyrum Griffin/The Coloradoan.

See also...

http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/sinkhole-swallows-car-in-denver-colorado.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/police-vehicle-swallowed-by-sinkhole-in.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/three-feared-dead-after-colorado.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/oil-spill-near-la-salle-colorado.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/two-workers-killed-by-gas-at-colorado.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/five-killed-by-colorado-rockfall.html
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Wednesday, 13 December 2017

Explosion kills one at Austrian gas distribution centre.

One person has died and at least 21 more have been injured following an explosion at a gas-processing plant at Baumgarten in Austria on Tuesday 12 December 2017. The incident happened at about 8.45 am local time, and triggered a fire which swept through the plant, which is operated by Austrian gas company Gas Connect, and caries natural gas supplied by Russia's Gazprom to Austria and countries to the south. The cause of the blast has not yet been established.

Column of fire over the Baumgarten Gas-hub following an explosion on 12 December 2017. Tomáš Hulik/Reuters.

The explosion has caused immediate concerns about gas supplies to southern Europe, with Italy declaring a state of emergency after retail gas prices rose 97% in twenty four hours, and supplies to Croatia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia are also threatened. The incident has effected even parts of Europe not directly supplied through the Baumgarten plant, with gas prices up 35% in the UK, Europe's largest consumer of natural gas, though this partly due to technical problems interrupting supplies from both the British and Norwegian North Sea Oilfields.

See also...

http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/seven-dead-as-north-sea-storm-herwart.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/understanding-deposition-of-suevites-in.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/gaseous-emissions-kill-three-family.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/earthquake-kills-two-in-italian-island.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/eight-missing-after-landslide-in.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/eight-injured-following-phraetic.html
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Saturday, 19 August 2017

Explosion kills one and injures five as theft from gas pipeline goes wrong in Veracruz State, Mexico.

At least one person has died and another five have been injured following an explosion on a natural gas pipeline near Ixtaczoquitlán in Veracruz State, Mexico, apparently caused by thieves drilling into the pipeline on the morning of Saturday 19 August 2017. No details about the dead person have been released at this time, but the injured have been identified as men aged 20, 25, 36 and 65, plus a pregnant 15-year-old girl, all of whom suffered extensive burns; it is not clear whether any of the known casualties were involved in the theft, or were Innocent victims of the incident. 

Burning pipeline in Veracruz State, Mexico, following in explosion on Saturday 19 August 2017. Quadratin Edomex.

The fire has been brought under control by emergency services after the pipeline operators, Pemex, stopped the flow of gas through the pipeline, depriving the fire of fuel. It is likely that the incident was caused by thieves attempting to steal oil, rather than gas, from the pipeline. Thefts of oil from pipelines in Mexico have risen almost ninefold in the last decade, driven by growing economic inequality and rising fuel prices.

See also...

http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/sinkhole-swallows-bus-in-veracruz-mexico.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/landslides-kill-at-least-40-as-tropical.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/landslide-kills-twelve-bus-passengers.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/13-killed-by-landslide-in-veracruz.html
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Sunday, 12 February 2017

Worker feared dead following explosion at Louisiana pipeline station.

A worker is feared to be dead following an explosion and fire at a pipeline station at Paradis in St Charles Parish, Louisiana. Josh Helms, of Thibodaux, Louisiana, described as an experienced pipeline worker, was one of six workers at the Phillips 66 operated station when the explosion occurred at about 7.00 pm on Thursday 9 February 2017; he has not been seen following the event, and it is now thought unlikely that he will be found alive. Two other workers were injured in the incident, one of who is still being treated in , though he is expected to make a full recovery. About 60 homes were evacuated following the event and a section of a local highway closed off. The fire was largely brought under control the following day, and people allowed to return to their homes, though it is still burning and part of the highway is still closed off.

Fire burning at a pipline station in Paradis, Louisiana, on 9 February 2017. Brett Duke/The Times-Picayune.

The workers are understood to have been undertaking routine cleaning work at the time of the explosion, the cause of which is still unknown. The pipeline is understood to have been carrying y-grade natural gas liquids (a light fraction obtained from crude oil which can be stored and transported as a liquid under pressure, but is likely to return to a gaseous state when released, comprising a mixture of propane, isobutane, pentane, hexane and other light hydrocarbons) from Venice in Plaquemines Parish, where hydrocarbons are pumped onshore from drilling stations in the Gulf of Mexico. The supply was shut off immediately after the explosion occurred, but due to the nature of the material it will be impossible to extinguish the fire completely until all the fuel in the pipeline has burned off.

See also...

http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/chevron-worker-killed-in-explosion-off.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/burning-gas-rig-off-coast-of-louisiana.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/explosion-at-oil-facility-in-louisiana.htmlhttp://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/two-feared-dead-after-explosion-on-oil.html
http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/massive-sinkhole-opens-up-in-assumption.html
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.