Showing posts with label Dogfish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dogfish. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 July 2020

Squalus shiraii: A new species of Dogfish from Japan.

Dogfish Sharks of the genus Squalus are commercially-important taxa within the world Fish trade, in which individuals are caught through direct or indirect fisheries and traded for consumption of meat, fins and liver oil as primary products. Although highly exploited, the landing reports, observer and logbooks data and/or fisheries surveys have constantly pointed out that accurate identification of species is scarce. Fisheries management and conservation of Dogfish thus still outstanding as species-specific catch and landing statistics, population threats and trends are not yet acknowledged. Japan is one of the world’s leading Shark fishing countries, whose estimated annual shark landing data for between 1992 and 2000 was 19 600–28 700 tonnes. Over 78 Elasmobranch species currently evaluated as threatened (Vulnerable; Critically Endangered; or Endangered) in the Red List of Threatened Species of the International Union for Conservation of Nature are traded in the Japanese Shark fin markets, highlighting it as a priority country for Elasmobranch conservation, even though Shark catches have decreased drastically. Squalus and other Squalid Sharks have been exploited in Japan as by-catch fisheries of Pacific Salmon gillnets, Tuna longliners and Squid driftnets, but fishery statistics related to Squalus stocks are unreported or deficient and usually inserted into the category of 'other species'.

In a paper published in the journal Zoosystematics and Evolution on 10 June 2020, Sarah Viana of the South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity and the Departamento de Zoologia at the Universidade de São Paulo, and Marcelo de Carvalho, also of the Departamento de Zoologia at the Universidade de São Paulo,describe a new species of Dogfish from the Okinawa Trench, Japan.

Five of 36 valid Squalus species are often recognised in Japan, Squalus blainvillei, Squalus suckleyi, Squalus mitsukurii, Squalus japonicus, and Squalus brevirostris. Two additional nominal species, Squalus acutirostris and Squalus wakiyae, originally described from Japan, are considered junior synonyms of Squalus mitsukurii and Squalus acanthias, respectively. A sixth species, Squalus formosus, a Taiwanese endemic, is likely to inhabit Japanese waters as well, but requires confirmation. These species are found on lower continental shelves, upper continental slopes and, more rarely, on insular slopes and seamounts of the North Pacific and Eastern Indian Oceans between Russia, Japan, China, South Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines. These species are all now classified as Data Deficient nder the terms of the  International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s Red List of  Threatened Species, except for Squalus suckleyi which is of Least Concern. A key criterion to be inserted into the first category is unreliability of species identification and, thus, species-specific data are inaccurate or doubtful and may not be incorporated into the assessments.

Systematic approaches of the last decade support that Squalus mitsukurii comprises a species complex that also includes Squalus blainvillei, a species originally described from the Mediterranean Sea. Two additional species, previously misidentified with Squalus mitsukurii, were also more recently recognised in the North Pacific Ocean, Squalus hawaiiensis and Squalus boretzi. Records of Squalus japonicus and Squalus brevirostris are exclusive to the Indo-Pacific region, with uncertainties regarding their occurrences in Northern Australia and Indonesia due to morphological similarities with Squalus megalops and Squalus nasutus.

Taxonomic confusions within this Linnaean group are ordinary because of fair original descriptions, indistinct indistinct morphological diagnostic characters and exaggerated availability of synonyms. Species delimitation using DNA barcoding of mitochondrial genes alone has shown to be ineffective on the genus when non-designation of species identifications in the DNA reference libraries persists as collection-based data are not incorporated within the taxonomic investigations. Comparative examination of over 150 specimens of Squalus from the North Pacific Ocean, particularly from Japan, support the recognition of a novel species that has not been included in the latest molecular genetic and morphological taxonomic analyses of the genus. Viana and de Carvalho's study describes a new species of Squalus, based on morphological characters.

The new species is named Squalus shiraii, in honour of Shigeru Shirai, an ichthyologist at the Tokyo University of Agriculture, for his valuable contributions to the systematics of Squaliformes. The species is described from sixteen specimens collected from depths of between 310 and 390 in the shallow waters of the upper continental slope off Southern Japan between 1978 and 1997.

Map of the North-western Pacific Ocean, showing the known geographical distribution of Squalus shiraii. Viana & de Carvalho (2020).

The body of Squalus shiraii is elongate (590–770 mm maximum length in adults), fusiform and robust, arched dorsally from anterior margin of the eye to insertion of first dorsal fin, turning straight from abdomen to caudal fin, it is equally deep from head to abdomen with head height. The body is at its greatest width at head, with the head width being  1.0–1.2 times the trunk width and 1.2–1.5 times the abdomen width. The head is flattened anterior-dorsally, arched posterior-dorsally and elongate, its length, forming 24.1% of the total body length. The snout is conspicuously obtuse at tip and large, with the preorbital length forming 7.4%–8.1% of the total body length. The anterior margin of the nostrils is strongly broad and bi-lobed, its distance to snout tip is1.1–1.3 times its distance to upper labial furrow; the prenarial length is 0.5–0.6 times the preoral length; the internarial space is 0.8–1.1 times the eye length. The eyes are oval and enlarged, the eye length is 1.9–3.4 times the eye height; the anterior margin of the eyes is convex, and the posterior margin slightly notched. The prespiracular length is 1.7–1.7 times the preorbital length and 0.6–0.6 times the prepectoral length. The spiracles are crescent-shaped and large, with a length of 1.0%–1.3% the total length, located laterally behind the eyes. The gill slits are tall and somewhat vertical, placed anteriorly to the pectoral-fin origin; the fifth gill slit height ia 1.1–1.7 times the first gill slit height.

Squalus shiraii: lateral (A)–(C) and ventral (D), (E) views; first (F) and second (G) dorsal fins; pectoral (H) and caudal (I) fins. HUMZ 149389 (holotype), adult male, 590 mm total length (A), (D), (F)–(I); HUMZ 80329 (paratype), adult female, 770 mm total length (B); HUMZ 80330 (paratype), juvenile male, 365 mm total length (C), (E). Scale bars: 50 mm (A)–(E); 20 mm (F)–(I). Viana & de Carvalho (2020).

The preoral length is 1.3–1.5 times the mouth width and 0.4–0.5 times the head length. The upper labial furrow is short, its length is 0.4–0.5 being times eye length, with a thick and small fold; the lower labial furrow is elongate with an inconspicuous fold. The mouth arched and broad, its width is 1.3–1.4 times the prenarial length and 1.5–1.7 times the internarial space. The teeth are similar in both jaws; the upper teeth are smaller than the lower teeth; with oblique cusps, which are thick and small; the mesial cutting edge is slightly convex; the distal heel is rounded; the mesial heel notched; the apron short and heavy. There are two and two to three series of functional teeth in the upper and lower jaws, respectively, 13–14 tooth rows on the upper jaw and 11–12 tooth rows on lower jaw.

Upper (A) and lower (B) teeth of Squalus shiraii. Scale bar is 1 mm. Viana & de Carvalho (2020).

The origin of the first dorsal fin is over a vertical line traced at pectoral-fin insertion. First dorsal fin elongate, its length is 1.4–1.7 times the height of the first dorsal fin; the first dorsal fin is conspicuously tall, its height is 1.5–1.8 times the first dorsal-fin inner margin length; the first dorsal-fin anterior margin is convex, the posterior margin is straight in the upper half and conspicuously concave in the lower half; the first dorsal-fin is apex rounded and evidently slender at the fin web; the first dorsal-fin free rear tip is triangular and the first dorsal-fin inner margin is short, its length 0.5–0.7 times the first dorsal-fin base length. The first dorsal-fin spine is thick with base width of 0.9–0.9% of the total body length and elongate (the first dorsal-fin spine length is 0.4–0.5 times the height of the first dorsal fin), although never reaching first dorsal-fin apex. The interdorsal space is 1.0–1.2 times the prepectoral length and 2.2–2.8 times the dorsal-caudal space. The pre-second dorsal length is 2.0–2.1 times the pre-first dorsal length. The second dorsal fin is elongate, its length is 0.7–0.9 times the length of the first dorsal fin; the second dorsal fin is tall, its height is 1.4–1.8 times the second dorsal-fin inner margin length; the second dorsal-fin anterior margin is convex; the second dorsal-fin posterior margin is strongly concave and falcate; the second dorsal-fin apex is rounded and lobe-like; the second dorsal-fin inner margin is small, its length is 0.5–0.6 times the second dorsal-fin base length. The second dorsal-fin spine is thick with a base width 0.7%–0.8% of the total body length; the second dorsal-fin spine is elongate, its length is 0.7–0.9 times the height of the second dorsal fin and 1.2–1.6 times the length of the first dorsal-fin spine, although not reaching the second dorsal-fin apex.

The prepectoral length is 2.8–2.9 times the preorbital length. Pectoral fins have anterior and inner margins which are conspicuously convex; tje pectoral-fin posterior margin is markedly concave; the pectoral-fin apex and free rear tips are rounded and lobe-like; the pectoral-fin apex conspicuously transcends the horizontal line traced at pectoral-fin free rear tip; the pectoral fins are markedly falcate and broad with pectoral-fin posterior margins 0.4–1.0 times the trunk height; the pectoral-fin anterior margin is 1.7–2.0 times the pectoral-fin inner margin length and 1.4–3.2 times the pectoral-fin posterior margin length. The prepelvic length is 2.0–2.2 times the prepectoral length. The pelvic fins are located slightly nearer to the first dorsal fin than the second dorsal fin. The pelvic fins have margins which are straight and an apex which is rounded; the pelvic-fin free rear tips are rounded to slightly pointed, thin and lobe-like. Adult males have claspers which somewhat transcend the pelvic fin; the clasper inner length is 0.3–1.2 times the pelvic-fin inner margin length; the clasper groove is medial-dorsally and vertical, profound and elongate; the apopyle is broad, located anteriorly in the clasper groove; the hypopyle is broad, and located anterior to the rhipidion; the rhipidion is blade-like, thin and small, placed at the medial-distal end of the clasper.

The pelvic-caudal space is 1.1–1.6 times the pectoral-pelvic space. The caudal keel is evident laterally in the caudal peduncle from the second dorsal fin free rear tip to the caudal-fin origin. The caudal fin has conspicuously thin upper and lower caudal lobes; the caudal fork is concave with its width corresponding to 5.7%–6.4% of the total body length; the dorsal caudal margin is straight and markedly elongate, its length is 0.9–1.0 times the head length and 1.9–2.1 times the length of the preventral caudal margin; the upper postventral margin is straight on its upper half and slightly convex on its lower half; the lower postventral margin is convex; the preventral caudal margin is convex and short, its length is 2.1–2.3 times the length of the pelvic-fin inner margin; the dorsal caudal tip is rounded; the ventral caudal tip is markedly pointed.

The dermal denticles are lanceolate and imbricate, and broad at the crown base (conspicuously broad in females); the length of the dermal denticles is larger than their width (although it is about equal to their width in females); the denticles have a median cusp which is slightly pointed, the lateral cusps are inconspicuous; the median and lateral ridges are thick; the median and lateral ridge is bifurcated anteriorly; the anterior furrow is conspicuously profound and oval.

Scanning electron microscopy of the dermal denticles of Squalus shiraii, HUMZ 149389 (holotype), adult male, 590 mm total length. Scale bars: 200 μm (A), 50μm (B).

The body is brown dorsally, light brown laterally, although whitish latero-ventrally from the pelvic fin to the caudal fin and pale ventrally. The dorsal fins are brownish, somewhat light brown at dorsal fin base; the first dorsal-fin inner margin is white; the second dorsal-fin posterior margin is fairly white at its lower half; the second dorsal-fin apex us somewhat dark brown. The dorsal-fin spines brownish anterior-laterally and white at the tip. The pectoral fins are dark brown, whitish ventrally at pectoral-fin base; the pectoral-fin posterior margin is fairly white (not uniform); the pectoral-fin apex is broadly white. The pelvic fins are brown and whitish at the pelvic-fin base; the pelvic-fin anterior and posterior margins are slightly white. The caudal fin is dark brown at the upper and lower caudal lobes, whitish over  the vertebral column; the postventral caudal margins is white, except at the caudal fork where it is dark brown; the dorsal and ventral caudal tips are broadly white; the preventral caudal margin is white; a dark caudal stripe and bar inconspicuous; a black upper caudal blotch is somewhat evident in adults. Juveniles have a body which is light brown dorsally, pale lateral and ventrally; the first and second dorsal-fin posterior margins are slightly white at the lower half; the dorsal-fin apex is blackish to dark brown at the tip; the pectoral fins are light brown to reddish-brown with the pectoral-fin posterior margins and apex broadly white; the pelvic fins are light brown to reddish-brown; caudal fin dark brown with the postventral caudal margins broadly white, except at the caudal fork; dorsal and ventral caudal tips are broadly white; a conspicuous upper black caudal blotch is present in the midline of the dorsal caudal margin; lower caudal lobe has an oblique black marking at the origin of the lower caudal lobe; and a small black caudal bar at the caudal fork.

See also...

https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2020/07/sharks-from-early-silurian-of-tarim.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2020/05/californian-surfer-dies-after-being.html
https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2020/04/australian-park-ranger-killed-by-shark.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2019/12/human-remains-found-inside-shark-caught.html
https://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2019/11/two-english-tourists-injured-in-shark.htmlhttps://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2019/10/tourist-badly-imjured-in-shark-attack.html
Follow Sciency Thoughts on Facebook.

Thursday, 16 January 2014

Deepwater Sharks from the Early Miocene of Slovakia.

Sharks appear in the fossil record between 450 and 420 million years ago (all possible specimens older than 420 million years old are fragmentary and disputed), and have been important marine (and in the Carboniferous and Permian, freshwater) predators ever since. They form an important part of the marine fossil record in many areas, and are occasionally used for stratigraphy (dating rocks), though often they are usually only represented by their teeth, which are mineralized and grown and shed throughout their lives, rather than their skeletons, which are comprised entirely of cartilage, and consequently have poor preservational potential.

In a paper published in the journal Acta Palaeontologica Polonica on 12 January 2012, Charles  Underwood of the Department of Earth and Planetary Science at Birkbeck College and Jan Schlogl of the Department of Geology and Paleontology at Comenius University describe a collection of deepwater Shark's teeth from the Cerová−Lieskové locality in the Malé Karpaty Mountains in Slovakia.  This is a claypit noted for a broad range of vertebrate and invertebrate fossils from the Early Miocene of the Central Paratethys Sea. These fossils are thought to be important, as while Shark teeth are well represented in the fossil record, deepwater Sharks are relatively poorly known.

Ten incomplete specimens are referred to the genus Galeus (Sawtooth Catsharks), though not assigned to any species. These are small specimens, the largest being about 0.7 mm. The genus Galeus first appears in the fossil record in the Early Miocene of France, and is widespread in the Atlantic and Pacific today.

Teeth assigned to the genus Galeus from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. (A) Anterolateral tooth in labial (A₁) and lingual (A₂) views. (B) Anterolateral tooth in labial view. (C) Posterior tooth in labial view. (D) Anterior tooth in labial view. (E) Anterolateral tooth in labial view. (F) Anterolateral tooth in labial view. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

A single, 2.2 mm, broken tooth is assigned to the genus Squatina (Angel Sharks). Modern Angel Sharks are found globally in tropical and temperate seas; most species are restricted to shallow waters, though one species, the Sand Devil (Squatina dumeril) is known to migrate seasonally into deep water. Angle Sharks are flattened Sharks resembling Skates and Rays (to which they are not closely related) and living on the sea bottom. Angel Sharks are considered to belong to a separate order (Squaliformes) which first appears in the fossil record in the Late Jurassic, with members of the modern genus (Squatina) known from the Middle Cretaceous.

Partial tooth assigned to the genus Squatina from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

Three oral and one incomplete rostral teeth (rostral teeth are projections on the side of the snout of a Sawshark or Sawfish) are referred to the genus Pristiophorus (Five-gilled Sawsharks), and assigned to a new species, Pristiophorus striatus. Sawsharks resemble Sawfish (which are also Sharks), but are found in deepwater, while the Sawfish are shallow-water dwellers. The two groups are not closely related, Sawfish being related to Skates and Rays (Batoidea).  The oldest Sawsharks appear in the Lart Cretaceous of the Lebanon, about 85 million years ago, modern Sawsharks are found in the Indian and Pacific Oceans as well as the Caribbean, though their fossil record suggests they were more widely distributed for much of the Tertiary. 

Teeth assigned to the species Pristiophorus striatus from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. (H) Lateral tooth in labial (H₁), occlusal (H₂), and basal (H₃) views. (I) Partial rostral tooth in lateral view. (J) Anterior tooth in labial (J₁), occlusal (J₂), and basal (J₃) views. (K) Lateral tooth in labial (K₁) and basal (K₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

A large number (236) of teeth are assigned to the genus Squaliolus (Pygmy Sharks or Deep-sea Dogfish), and tentatively to the species Squaliolus schaubi, a species previously described from the Miocene of France. Modern Pygmy Sharks are small deepwater species with specialized organs that house bioluminescent bacteria. They are a form of Kitefin Shark (Dalatiidae), a group that first appear in the fossil record in the Early Cretaceous of Germany.


Teeth tentatively assigned to the species Squaliolus schaubi from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. (A) Lower tooth in labial (A₁) and lingual (A₂) views. (B) Lower tooth in labial (B₁) and lingual (B₂) views. (C) Lower posterior tooth in labial (C₁) and lingual (C₂) views. (D) Male lower tooth in labial view. (E) Lower symphyseal tooth in labial (E₁) and lingual (E₂) views. (F) Lower tooth in labial (F₁) and lingual (F₂) views. Upper tooth in labial (G₁) and lingual (G₂) views. (H) Upper tooth in labial (H₁) and lingual (H₂) views. (I) Upper tooth in labial (I₁) and lingual (I₂) views. (J) Upper tooth in labial view. (K) Upper tooth in labial (K₁) and lingual (K₂) views. (L) Upper posterior tooth in labial (L₁) and lingual (L₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

Fourteen partial and complete teeth are referred to the genus Eosqualiolus, a genus of Kitefin Shark which previously contained only a single fossil species from the Eocene of France, and assigned to a new species, Eosqualiolus skrovinai, which is named after Michal Škrovina, described as the first person to encourage Jan Schlogl in to pursue an interest in palaeontology.

Teeth assigned to the species Eosqualiolus skrovinai from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. (A) Lower tooth in labial (A₁) and lingual (A₂) views. (B) Lower tooth in labial (B₁) and lingual (B₂) views. (C) Lower tooth in labial (C₁) and lingual (C₂) views. (D) Lower tooth in labial (D₁) and lingual (D₂) views. (E) Upper tooth in labial (E₁) and lingual (E₂) views. (F) Upper tooth in labial (F₁) and lingual (F₂) views. (G) Upper tooth in labial (G₁) and lingual (G₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

One, damaged, tooth is assigned to a third Kitefin Shark genus, Squaliodalatias, though not assigned to a species due to its poor condition. Fossils assigned to this genus have previously been found from the Late Cretaceous of Lithuania and the Eocene of France.

Tooth assigned to the genus Squaliodalatias from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. In labial (H₁) and lingual (H₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

Eight partial and complete teeth are assigned to the genus Etmopterus (Lantern Sharks in the family Etmopteridae), small, deepwater Sharks with light producing organs, found more-or-less globally today. The earliest known Lantern Sharks are from the Eocene of France.

Teeth assigned to the genus Etmopterus from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. (A) Lower tooth in labial (A₁) and lingual (A₂) views. (B) Lower tooth in labial (B₁) and lingual (B₂) views. (C) Lower posterior tooth in labial (C₁) and lingual (C₂) views. (D) Lower tooth in labial (A₁) and lingual (A₂) views. (E) Lower tooth in labial (E₁) and lingual (E₂) views. (F) Lower tooth in labial view. (G) Upper tooth in labial (G₁) and lingual (G₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

Ten partial and complete teeth are tentatively assigned to the genus Miroscyllium (Rasptooth Dogfish), a second type of Lantern Shark. The genus is previously known from a single modern species from the Pacific and some teeth from the Eocene of France.

Teeth tentatively assigned to the genus Miroscyllium from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. (H) Lower symphyseal tooth in labial (H₁) and lingual (H₂) views. (I) Lower tooth in labial (I₁) and lingual (I₂) views. (J) Lower lateral tooth in labial (J₁) and lingual (J₂) views. (K) Lower tooth in labial (K₁) and lingual (K₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

Fifty three partial and complete teeth are assigned to the genus Paraetmopterus, an extinct Lantern Shark previously only known from teeth from the Eocene of France, and placed in a new species, Paraetmopterus horvathi, named in honour of Juraj and Tereza Horvath and their children.

Teeth assigned to the species Paraetmopterus horvathi from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. (A) Lower tooth in labial (A₁) and lingual (A₂) views. (B) Lower tooth in labial (B₁)
and lingual (B₂) views. (C) Lower tooth in labial (C₁) and lingual (C₂) views. (D) Lower tooth in labial (D₁) and lingual (D₂) views. (E) Lower tooth in labial (E₁) and lingual (E₂) views. (F) Lower tooth in labial (F₁) and lingual (F₂) views. (G) Upper anterior tooth in labial (G₁) and lingual (G₂) views. (H) Upper tooth in labial (H₁) and lingual (H₂) views. (I) Upper tooth in labial (I₁) and lingual (I₂) views. (J) Upper tooth in labial (J₁) and lingual (J₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

A single tooth is assigned to the family Somniosidae (Sleeper Sharks), a widespread group of Sharks that first appear in the fossil record in the Late Cretaceous of Germany.

Tooth assigned to the family Somniosidae from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. In labial (K₁) and lingual (K₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

A single imperfect tooth is referred to the genus Gymnura (Butterfly Rays). Modern Butterfly Rays are typically shallow water species, often found in brackish estuarine waters. The genus has a sparse fossil record, but is known from the Palaeocene of India, spreading around Europe, the Middle East and Africa in the Eocene and reaching the Americas in the Oligocene.

Tooth assigned to the genus Gymnura from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. In occlusal (I₁) and basal (I₂) views. Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

Twenty eight complete and partial teeth are assigned to a new species, Nanocetorhinus tuberculatus, of uncertain affinities, but considered to probably be a Neoselachian (the group that includes all extant Sharks, Skates and Rays). The genus name Nanocetorhinus refers to the similarity of the teeth to those of the planktivorous Shark Cetorhinus (the Basking Shark), though these teeth are much smaller, and the specific name, tuberculatus refers to the ornamentation on the teeth.

Teeth assigned to the species Nanocetorhinus tuberculatus from the Early Miocene Cerová−Lieskové locality. (A) Tooth in labial (A₁) and lingual (A₂) views. (B) Tooth in labial (B₁) and lingual (B₂) views. (C) Tooth in labial (C₁) and lingual (C₂) views. (D) Tooth in labial (D₁) and lingual (D₂) views. (E) Tooth in labial (E₁) and lingual (E₂) views. (F) Tooth in labial (F₁) and lateral (F₂) views. (G) Tooth in labial (G₁) and lingual (G₂) views. (H) Tooth in labial (H₁) and lingual (H₂) views, detail (H₃). Underwood & Schlogl (2012).

While the majority of these Sharks belong either to extant genera or extant families, the assemblage is on the whole closer to the deepwater Sharks of the Eocene than to modern Shark assemblages, suggesting that there has been more turnover in deepwater Shark populations since the Miocene than between the Eocene and the Miocene. One remarkable feature of this assemblage is the small size of all the Sharks present; based upon the available material Underwood & Shlogl estimate that none of the Sharks were more than 40 cm in length, though they do not offer any hypothesis as to why this was the case.

Saturday, 10 March 2012

New species of Catshark from the Galapaagos.

Catsharks, or Dogfish, are small bottom dwelling sharks found in oceans throughout the world.

In a paper published in the journal Zootaxa on 5 March 2012, John McCosker, of the Department of Aquatic Biology at the California Academy of Sciences, Douglas Long, of the Department of Aquatic Biology at the California Academy of Sciences and the Department of Natural Sciences at the Oakland Museum of California, and Carole Baldwin of the Division of Fishes at the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution, report the discovery of a new species of Catshark from the Galapagos Islands, named as Bythaelurus giddingsi, the Galapagos Catshark, or Giddings' Catshark, in honor of underwater filmaker Al Giddings.

The Galapagos, or Giddings', Catshark (Bythaelurus giddingsi). From McCosker, Long & Baldwin (2012).

The Galapagos Catshark grows to slightly over 400 mm in length. Unlike other Catsharks of the genus Bythaelurus, which tend to be plain in colour, or tend to have a single line of spots, Bythaelurus giddingsi is spotted all over, and, unlike most sharks of any type, these spots are not symmetrical but are placed in different positions on different parts of the body.

The sharks were discovered at a depths of between 450 and 600 m between the islands of Darwin and Marchena using the Johnson Sea-Link submersible. They are thought to be indigenous to the Galapagos.